Message ID | 20221219010838.3878675-3-christoph.muellner@vrull.eu |
---|---|
State | Committed |
Headers |
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B028A3A604C7 for <patchwork@sourceware.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 01:10:18 +0000 (GMT) X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ADAD39578D0 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 01:08:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5ADAD39578D0 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=vrull.eu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=vrull.eu Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id i9so10915845edj.4 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 17:08:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vrull.eu; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=lh+zxEIWJBqquCtSwUtBl6+u5FWf/VWLRsOsKrXCteY=; b=SAgA5tOHfVyIqkWAMvGv9AdlZJCVsEX+bM+3d14b81iMjPKlJ7kckkTsU86yoA9kqt /y8jXuN6aS7L4Fpp0nKwXXfsYUpEd1qpjBW3On8FaC7G/OUqoNtrrt4xEqsYsCSjtxiF fVz9ZiT9g9+iAXYqf1syUEZeGlIwOC9XsnkQjNtlCohwsdWybv2Tl+QKTmbGD8WWLc+l fLD/rpiZlR6Z4Q+jJfdjVnxqhJmyHCrIAMTRne2z2eaanM/oFmLhbf/FsClf2KPS+4Xs d1QjkSAgHr/5it/MPFHgFodb9Hptj3fYbWKeQSNapv4de1lZrmgdGoX0oH4osuAZvOJA nW/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lh+zxEIWJBqquCtSwUtBl6+u5FWf/VWLRsOsKrXCteY=; b=dlrFSCyIwEHYqFIi8Jp2siJjxohLWLVJIJlbmAPtTHDUNKqT6eHmkT9WsfqugCl0BT HX/gO48dwr7MwV54eTTa3I5ZhizNmCPn2mMrB6UG+HZNTWWVM7S3Ozav76A9/Dy9puak mHuofImpDDHB455izXFbqndcqKJEvCg1yDp8kNiImA63ijN2WJSTBqocCx1YOKr+1oSw 92hF2386yu8njbzjTrbsMFk+kibG4dEY2MOA96dajcbjb4SHxhwAd9yiuBYkvXjXnGpy IrfZocKPtXyJ2vOWD1P3XYQ6u5TFNj1neL+ZoB8Y35obgEXjPppFPfhgBKlta0JqtqgR /Cng== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pljSH4BIfp0HRKLwG6rNm+50KamZ1Iw0eE0OZhqf5HINqFKT09h gKyPQtVSZOdM7GUToAtaRHtYU9YrwaupcdGR X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7Nhci954TejtNdhtrJ2ilWTKuOAN1pRthG+pOvzIMmUpFkuEuXIi5q1B/l0cVEmCDdYubGig== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dc14:0:b0:46d:e3f8:4ed1 with SMTP id b20-20020aa7dc14000000b0046de3f84ed1mr42678794edu.35.1671412124722; Sun, 18 Dec 2022 17:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from beast.fritz.box (62-178-148-172.cable.dynamic.surfer.at. [62.178.148.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id eg53-20020a05640228b500b0044dbecdcd29sm3744648edb.12.2022.12.18.17.08.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 18 Dec 2022 17:08:44 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>, Jim Wilson <jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>, Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>, Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>, Cooper Qu <cooper.qu@linux.alibaba.com>, Lifang Xia <lifang_xia@linux.alibaba.com>, Yunhai Shang <yunhai@linux.alibaba.com>, Zhiwei Liu <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: =?utf-8?q?Christoph_M=C3=BCllner?= <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> Subject: [PATCH v2 02/11] riscv: Restructure callee-saved register save/restore code Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 02:08:29 +0100 Message-Id: <20221219010838.3878675-3-christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: <20221219010838.3878675-1-christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> References: <20221219010838.3878675-1-christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_MANYTO, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" <gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org> |
Series |
RISC-V: Add XThead* extension support
|
|
Commit Message
Christoph Müllner
Dec. 19, 2022, 1:08 a.m. UTC
From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> This patch restructures the loop over the GP registers which saves/restores then as part of the prologue/epilogue. No functional change is intended by this patch, but it offers the possibility to use load-pair/store-pair instructions. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_next_saved_reg): New function. (riscv_is_eh_return_data_register): New function. (riscv_for_each_saved_reg): Restructure loop. Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> --- gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Comments
just one more nit: Use INVALID_REGNUM as sentinel value for riscv_next_saved_reg, otherwise LGTM, and feel free to commit that separately :) On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:08 AM Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> wrote: > > From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> > > This patch restructures the loop over the GP registers > which saves/restores then as part of the prologue/epilogue. > No functional change is intended by this patch, but it > offers the possibility to use load-pair/store-pair instructions. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_next_saved_reg): New function. > (riscv_is_eh_return_data_register): New function. > (riscv_for_each_saved_reg): Restructure loop. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> > --- > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > index 6dd2ab2d11e..a8d5e1dac7f 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > @@ -4835,6 +4835,49 @@ riscv_save_restore_reg (machine_mode mode, int regno, > fn (gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno), mem); > } > > +/* Return the next register up from REGNO up to LIMIT for the callee > + to save or restore. OFFSET will be adjusted accordingly. > + If INC is set, then REGNO will be incremented first. */ > + > +static unsigned int > +riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, > + HOST_WIDE_INT *offset, bool inc = true) > +{ > + if (inc) > + regno++; > + > + while (regno <= limit) > + { > + if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > + { > + *offset = *offset - UNITS_PER_WORD; > + break; > + } > + > + regno++; > + } > + return regno; > +} > + > +/* Return TRUE if provided REGNO is eh return data register. */ > + > +static bool > +riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (unsigned int regno) > +{ > + unsigned int i, regnum; > + > + if (!crtl->calls_eh_return) > + return false; > + > + for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != INVALID_REGNUM; i++) > + if (regno == regnum) > + { > + return true; > + } > + > + return false; > +} > + > /* Call FN for each register that is saved by the current function. > SP_OFFSET is the offset of the current stack pointer from the start > of the frame. */ > @@ -4844,36 +4887,31 @@ riscv_for_each_saved_reg (poly_int64 sp_offset, riscv_save_restore_fn fn, > bool epilogue, bool maybe_eh_return) > { > HOST_WIDE_INT offset; > + unsigned int regno; > + unsigned int start = GP_REG_FIRST; > + unsigned int limit = GP_REG_LAST; > > /* Save the link register and s-registers. */ > - offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant (); > - for (unsigned int regno = GP_REG_FIRST; regno <= GP_REG_LAST; regno++) > - if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > - { > - bool handle_reg = !cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]; > - > - /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the eh_return > - builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as that > - would clobber the return value. But we do still need to save them > - in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so we > - need special handling here. */ > - if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return && crtl->calls_eh_return) > - { > - unsigned int i, regnum; > - > - for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != INVALID_REGNUM; > - i++) > - if (regno == regnum) > - { > - handle_reg = FALSE; > - break; > - } > - } > - > - if (handle_reg) > - riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); > - offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD; > - } > + offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant () > + + UNITS_PER_WORD; > + for (regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (start, limit, &offset, false); > + regno <= limit; > + regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (regno, limit, &offset)) > + { > + if (cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]) > + continue; > + > + /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the eh_return > + builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as that > + would clobber the return value. But we do still need to save them > + in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so we > + need special handling here. */ > + if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return > + && riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (regno)) > + continue; > + > + riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); > + } > > /* This loop must iterate over the same space as its companion in > riscv_compute_frame_info. */ > -- > 2.38.1 >
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 7:30 AM Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com> wrote: > just one more nit: Use INVALID_REGNUM as sentinel value for > riscv_next_saved_reg, otherwise LGTM, and feel free to commit that > separately :) > Would this change below be ok? @@ -5540,7 +5540,7 @@ riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, if (inc) regno++; - while (regno <= limit) + while (regno <= limit && regno != INVALID_REGNUM) { if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) { Thanks, Christoph > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:08 AM Christoph Muellner > <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> wrote: > > > > From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> > > > > This patch restructures the loop over the GP registers > > which saves/restores then as part of the prologue/epilogue. > > No functional change is intended by this patch, but it > > offers the possibility to use load-pair/store-pair instructions. > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_next_saved_reg): New function. > > (riscv_is_eh_return_data_register): New function. > > (riscv_for_each_saved_reg): Restructure loop. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> > > --- > > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > > index 6dd2ab2d11e..a8d5e1dac7f 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > > @@ -4835,6 +4835,49 @@ riscv_save_restore_reg (machine_mode mode, int > regno, > > fn (gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno), mem); > > } > > > > +/* Return the next register up from REGNO up to LIMIT for the callee > > + to save or restore. OFFSET will be adjusted accordingly. > > + If INC is set, then REGNO will be incremented first. */ > > + > > +static unsigned int > > +riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, > > + HOST_WIDE_INT *offset, bool inc = true) > > +{ > > + if (inc) > > + regno++; > > + > > + while (regno <= limit) > > + { > > + if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > > + { > > + *offset = *offset - UNITS_PER_WORD; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + regno++; > > + } > > + return regno; > > +} > > + > > +/* Return TRUE if provided REGNO is eh return data register. */ > > + > > +static bool > > +riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (unsigned int regno) > > +{ > > + unsigned int i, regnum; > > + > > + if (!crtl->calls_eh_return) > > + return false; > > + > > + for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != INVALID_REGNUM; > i++) > > + if (regno == regnum) > > + { > > + return true; > > + } > > + > > + return false; > > +} > > + > > /* Call FN for each register that is saved by the current function. > > SP_OFFSET is the offset of the current stack pointer from the start > > of the frame. */ > > @@ -4844,36 +4887,31 @@ riscv_for_each_saved_reg (poly_int64 sp_offset, > riscv_save_restore_fn fn, > > bool epilogue, bool maybe_eh_return) > > { > > HOST_WIDE_INT offset; > > + unsigned int regno; > > + unsigned int start = GP_REG_FIRST; > > + unsigned int limit = GP_REG_LAST; > > > > /* Save the link register and s-registers. */ > > - offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant > (); > > - for (unsigned int regno = GP_REG_FIRST; regno <= GP_REG_LAST; regno++) > > - if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > > - { > > - bool handle_reg = > !cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]; > > - > > - /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the > eh_return > > - builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as > that > > - would clobber the return value. But we do still need to save > them > > - in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so > we > > - need special handling here. */ > > - if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return && crtl->calls_eh_return) > > - { > > - unsigned int i, regnum; > > - > > - for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != > INVALID_REGNUM; > > - i++) > > - if (regno == regnum) > > - { > > - handle_reg = FALSE; > > - break; > > - } > > - } > > - > > - if (handle_reg) > > - riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); > > - offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD; > > - } > > + offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant > () > > + + UNITS_PER_WORD; > > + for (regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (start, limit, &offset, false); > > + regno <= limit; > > + regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (regno, limit, &offset)) > > + { > > + if (cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]) > > + continue; > > + > > + /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the > eh_return > > + builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as > that > > + would clobber the return value. But we do still need to save > them > > + in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so we > > + need special handling here. */ > > + if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return > > + && riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (regno)) > > + continue; > > + > > + riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); > > + } > > > > /* This loop must iterate over the same space as its companion in > > riscv_compute_frame_info. */ > > -- > > 2.38.1 > > >
Something like this: static unsigned int riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, HOST_WIDE_INT *offset, bool inc = true) { if (inc) regno++; while (regno <= limit) { if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) { *offset = *offset - UNITS_PER_WORD; break; } regno++; } if (regno >= limit) return INVALID_REGNUM; else return regno; } ... for (regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (start, limit, &offset, false); regno != INVALID_REGNUM; regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (regno, limit, &offset)) { ... On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 5:21 PM Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 7:30 AM Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com> wrote: >> >> just one more nit: Use INVALID_REGNUM as sentinel value for >> riscv_next_saved_reg, otherwise LGTM, and feel free to commit that >> separately :) > > > Would this change below be ok? > > @@ -5540,7 +5540,7 @@ riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, > if (inc) > regno++; > > - while (regno <= limit) > + while (regno <= limit && regno != INVALID_REGNUM) > { > if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > { > > Thanks, > Christoph > > >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:08 AM Christoph Muellner >> <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> wrote: >> > >> > From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> >> > >> > This patch restructures the loop over the GP registers >> > which saves/restores then as part of the prologue/epilogue. >> > No functional change is intended by this patch, but it >> > offers the possibility to use load-pair/store-pair instructions. >> > >> > gcc/ChangeLog: >> > >> > * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_next_saved_reg): New function. >> > (riscv_is_eh_return_data_register): New function. >> > (riscv_for_each_saved_reg): Restructure loop. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> >> > --- >> > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >> > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc >> > index 6dd2ab2d11e..a8d5e1dac7f 100644 >> > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc >> > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc >> > @@ -4835,6 +4835,49 @@ riscv_save_restore_reg (machine_mode mode, int regno, >> > fn (gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno), mem); >> > } >> > >> > +/* Return the next register up from REGNO up to LIMIT for the callee >> > + to save or restore. OFFSET will be adjusted accordingly. >> > + If INC is set, then REGNO will be incremented first. */ >> > + >> > +static unsigned int >> > +riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, >> > + HOST_WIDE_INT *offset, bool inc = true) >> > +{ >> > + if (inc) >> > + regno++; >> > + >> > + while (regno <= limit) >> > + { >> > + if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) >> > + { >> > + *offset = *offset - UNITS_PER_WORD; >> > + break; >> > + } >> > + >> > + regno++; >> > + } >> > + return regno; >> > +} >> > + >> > +/* Return TRUE if provided REGNO is eh return data register. */ >> > + >> > +static bool >> > +riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (unsigned int regno) >> > +{ >> > + unsigned int i, regnum; >> > + >> > + if (!crtl->calls_eh_return) >> > + return false; >> > + >> > + for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != INVALID_REGNUM; i++) >> > + if (regno == regnum) >> > + { >> > + return true; >> > + } >> > + >> > + return false; >> > +} >> > + >> > /* Call FN for each register that is saved by the current function. >> > SP_OFFSET is the offset of the current stack pointer from the start >> > of the frame. */ >> > @@ -4844,36 +4887,31 @@ riscv_for_each_saved_reg (poly_int64 sp_offset, riscv_save_restore_fn fn, >> > bool epilogue, bool maybe_eh_return) >> > { >> > HOST_WIDE_INT offset; >> > + unsigned int regno; >> > + unsigned int start = GP_REG_FIRST; >> > + unsigned int limit = GP_REG_LAST; >> > >> > /* Save the link register and s-registers. */ >> > - offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant (); >> > - for (unsigned int regno = GP_REG_FIRST; regno <= GP_REG_LAST; regno++) >> > - if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) >> > - { >> > - bool handle_reg = !cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]; >> > - >> > - /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the eh_return >> > - builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as that >> > - would clobber the return value. But we do still need to save them >> > - in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so we >> > - need special handling here. */ >> > - if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return && crtl->calls_eh_return) >> > - { >> > - unsigned int i, regnum; >> > - >> > - for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != INVALID_REGNUM; >> > - i++) >> > - if (regno == regnum) >> > - { >> > - handle_reg = FALSE; >> > - break; >> > - } >> > - } >> > - >> > - if (handle_reg) >> > - riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); >> > - offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD; >> > - } >> > + offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant () >> > + + UNITS_PER_WORD; >> > + for (regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (start, limit, &offset, false); >> > + regno <= limit; >> > + regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (regno, limit, &offset)) >> > + { >> > + if (cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]) >> > + continue; >> > + >> > + /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the eh_return >> > + builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as that >> > + would clobber the return value. But we do still need to save them >> > + in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so we >> > + need special handling here. */ >> > + if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return >> > + && riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (regno)) >> > + continue; >> > + >> > + riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); >> > + } >> > >> > /* This loop must iterate over the same space as its companion in >> > riscv_compute_frame_info. */ >> > -- >> > 2.38.1 >> >
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 10:26 AM Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com> wrote: > Something like this: > > static unsigned int > riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, > HOST_WIDE_INT *offset, bool inc = true) > { > if (inc) > regno++; > > while (regno <= limit) > { > if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > { > *offset = *offset - UNITS_PER_WORD; > break; > } > > regno++; > } > if (regno >= limit) > return INVALID_REGNUM; > else > return regno; > } > ... > > for (regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (start, limit, &offset, false); > regno != INVALID_REGNUM; > regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (regno, limit, &offset)) > { > ... > > Ok, I see. I changed it as follows (it will be retested before committing): @@ -5531,7 +5531,8 @@ riscv_save_restore_reg (machine_mode mode, int regno, /* Return the next register up from REGNO up to LIMIT for the callee to save or restore. OFFSET will be adjusted accordingly. - If INC is set, then REGNO will be incremented first. */ + If INC is set, then REGNO will be incremented first. + Returns INVALID_REGNUM if there is no such next register. */ static unsigned int riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, @@ -5545,12 +5546,12 @@ riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) { *offset = *offset - UNITS_PER_WORD; - break; + return regno; } regno++; } - return regno; + return INVALID_REGNUM; } /* Return TRUE if provided REGNO is eh return data register. */ @@ -5589,7 +5590,7 @@ riscv_for_each_saved_reg (poly_int64 sp_offset, riscv_save_restore_fn fn, offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant () + UNITS_PER_WORD; for (regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (start, limit, &offset, false); - regno <= limit; + regno != INVALID_REGNUM; Thanks! > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 5:21 PM Christoph Müllner > <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 7:30 AM Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com> > wrote: > >> > >> just one more nit: Use INVALID_REGNUM as sentinel value for > >> riscv_next_saved_reg, otherwise LGTM, and feel free to commit that > >> separately :) > > > > > > Would this change below be ok? > > > > @@ -5540,7 +5540,7 @@ riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned > int limit, > > if (inc) > > regno++; > > > > - while (regno <= limit) > > + while (regno <= limit && regno != INVALID_REGNUM) > > { > > if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > > { > > > > Thanks, > > Christoph > > > > > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:08 AM Christoph Muellner > >> <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> wrote: > >> > > >> > From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> > >> > > >> > This patch restructures the loop over the GP registers > >> > which saves/restores then as part of the prologue/epilogue. > >> > No functional change is intended by this patch, but it > >> > offers the possibility to use load-pair/store-pair instructions. > >> > > >> > gcc/ChangeLog: > >> > > >> > * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_next_saved_reg): New function. > >> > (riscv_is_eh_return_data_register): New function. > >> > (riscv_for_each_saved_reg): Restructure loop. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> > >> > --- > >> > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 94 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > >> > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > >> > index 6dd2ab2d11e..a8d5e1dac7f 100644 > >> > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > >> > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > >> > @@ -4835,6 +4835,49 @@ riscv_save_restore_reg (machine_mode mode, int > regno, > >> > fn (gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno), mem); > >> > } > >> > > >> > +/* Return the next register up from REGNO up to LIMIT for the callee > >> > + to save or restore. OFFSET will be adjusted accordingly. > >> > + If INC is set, then REGNO will be incremented first. */ > >> > + > >> > +static unsigned int > >> > +riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, > >> > + HOST_WIDE_INT *offset, bool inc = true) > >> > +{ > >> > + if (inc) > >> > + regno++; > >> > + > >> > + while (regno <= limit) > >> > + { > >> > + if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > >> > + { > >> > + *offset = *offset - UNITS_PER_WORD; > >> > + break; > >> > + } > >> > + > >> > + regno++; > >> > + } > >> > + return regno; > >> > +} > >> > + > >> > +/* Return TRUE if provided REGNO is eh return data register. */ > >> > + > >> > +static bool > >> > +riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (unsigned int regno) > >> > +{ > >> > + unsigned int i, regnum; > >> > + > >> > + if (!crtl->calls_eh_return) > >> > + return false; > >> > + > >> > + for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != INVALID_REGNUM; > i++) > >> > + if (regno == regnum) > >> > + { > >> > + return true; > >> > + } > >> > + > >> > + return false; > >> > +} > >> > + > >> > /* Call FN for each register that is saved by the current function. > >> > SP_OFFSET is the offset of the current stack pointer from the > start > >> > of the frame. */ > >> > @@ -4844,36 +4887,31 @@ riscv_for_each_saved_reg (poly_int64 > sp_offset, riscv_save_restore_fn fn, > >> > bool epilogue, bool maybe_eh_return) > >> > { > >> > HOST_WIDE_INT offset; > >> > + unsigned int regno; > >> > + unsigned int start = GP_REG_FIRST; > >> > + unsigned int limit = GP_REG_LAST; > >> > > >> > /* Save the link register and s-registers. */ > >> > - offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - > sp_offset).to_constant (); > >> > - for (unsigned int regno = GP_REG_FIRST; regno <= GP_REG_LAST; > regno++) > >> > - if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > >> > - { > >> > - bool handle_reg = > !cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]; > >> > - > >> > - /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the > eh_return > >> > - builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers > as that > >> > - would clobber the return value. But we do still need to > save them > >> > - in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, > so we > >> > - need special handling here. */ > >> > - if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return && crtl->calls_eh_return) > >> > - { > >> > - unsigned int i, regnum; > >> > - > >> > - for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != > INVALID_REGNUM; > >> > - i++) > >> > - if (regno == regnum) > >> > - { > >> > - handle_reg = FALSE; > >> > - break; > >> > - } > >> > - } > >> > - > >> > - if (handle_reg) > >> > - riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); > >> > - offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD; > >> > - } > >> > + offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - > sp_offset).to_constant () > >> > + + UNITS_PER_WORD; > >> > + for (regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (start, limit, &offset, false); > >> > + regno <= limit; > >> > + regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (regno, limit, &offset)) > >> > + { > >> > + if (cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]) > >> > + continue; > >> > + > >> > + /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the > eh_return > >> > + builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as > that > >> > + would clobber the return value. But we do still need to > save them > >> > + in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, > so we > >> > + need special handling here. */ > >> > + if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return > >> > + && riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (regno)) > >> > + continue; > >> > + > >> > + riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); > >> > + } > >> > > >> > /* This loop must iterate over the same space as its companion in > >> > riscv_compute_frame_info. */ > >> > -- > >> > 2.38.1 > >> > >
Applied to master (with the change from the reviews), thanks! Philipp. On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 07:30, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com> wrote: > just one more nit: Use INVALID_REGNUM as sentinel value for > riscv_next_saved_reg, otherwise LGTM, and feel free to commit that > separately :) > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:08 AM Christoph Muellner > <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> wrote: > > > > From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> > > > > This patch restructures the loop over the GP registers > > which saves/restores then as part of the prologue/epilogue. > > No functional change is intended by this patch, but it > > offers the possibility to use load-pair/store-pair instructions. > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_next_saved_reg): New function. > > (riscv_is_eh_return_data_register): New function. > > (riscv_for_each_saved_reg): Restructure loop. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> > > --- > > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > > index 6dd2ab2d11e..a8d5e1dac7f 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc > > @@ -4835,6 +4835,49 @@ riscv_save_restore_reg (machine_mode mode, int > regno, > > fn (gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno), mem); > > } > > > > +/* Return the next register up from REGNO up to LIMIT for the callee > > + to save or restore. OFFSET will be adjusted accordingly. > > + If INC is set, then REGNO will be incremented first. */ > > + > > +static unsigned int > > +riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, > > + HOST_WIDE_INT *offset, bool inc = true) > > +{ > > + if (inc) > > + regno++; > > + > > + while (regno <= limit) > > + { > > + if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > > + { > > + *offset = *offset - UNITS_PER_WORD; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + regno++; > > + } > > + return regno; > > +} > > + > > +/* Return TRUE if provided REGNO is eh return data register. */ > > + > > +static bool > > +riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (unsigned int regno) > > +{ > > + unsigned int i, regnum; > > + > > + if (!crtl->calls_eh_return) > > + return false; > > + > > + for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != INVALID_REGNUM; > i++) > > + if (regno == regnum) > > + { > > + return true; > > + } > > + > > + return false; > > +} > > + > > /* Call FN for each register that is saved by the current function. > > SP_OFFSET is the offset of the current stack pointer from the start > > of the frame. */ > > @@ -4844,36 +4887,31 @@ riscv_for_each_saved_reg (poly_int64 sp_offset, > riscv_save_restore_fn fn, > > bool epilogue, bool maybe_eh_return) > > { > > HOST_WIDE_INT offset; > > + unsigned int regno; > > + unsigned int start = GP_REG_FIRST; > > + unsigned int limit = GP_REG_LAST; > > > > /* Save the link register and s-registers. */ > > - offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant > (); > > - for (unsigned int regno = GP_REG_FIRST; regno <= GP_REG_LAST; regno++) > > - if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) > > - { > > - bool handle_reg = > !cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]; > > - > > - /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the > eh_return > > - builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as > that > > - would clobber the return value. But we do still need to save > them > > - in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so > we > > - need special handling here. */ > > - if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return && crtl->calls_eh_return) > > - { > > - unsigned int i, regnum; > > - > > - for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != > INVALID_REGNUM; > > - i++) > > - if (regno == regnum) > > - { > > - handle_reg = FALSE; > > - break; > > - } > > - } > > - > > - if (handle_reg) > > - riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); > > - offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD; > > - } > > + offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant > () > > + + UNITS_PER_WORD; > > + for (regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (start, limit, &offset, false); > > + regno <= limit; > > + regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (regno, limit, &offset)) > > + { > > + if (cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]) > > + continue; > > + > > + /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the > eh_return > > + builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as > that > > + would clobber the return value. But we do still need to save > them > > + in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so we > > + need special handling here. */ > > + if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return > > + && riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (regno)) > > + continue; > > + > > + riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); > > + } > > > > /* This loop must iterate over the same space as its companion in > > riscv_compute_frame_info. */ > > -- > > 2.38.1 > > >
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc index 6dd2ab2d11e..a8d5e1dac7f 100644 --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc @@ -4835,6 +4835,49 @@ riscv_save_restore_reg (machine_mode mode, int regno, fn (gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno), mem); } +/* Return the next register up from REGNO up to LIMIT for the callee + to save or restore. OFFSET will be adjusted accordingly. + If INC is set, then REGNO will be incremented first. */ + +static unsigned int +riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit, + HOST_WIDE_INT *offset, bool inc = true) +{ + if (inc) + regno++; + + while (regno <= limit) + { + if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) + { + *offset = *offset - UNITS_PER_WORD; + break; + } + + regno++; + } + return regno; +} + +/* Return TRUE if provided REGNO is eh return data register. */ + +static bool +riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (unsigned int regno) +{ + unsigned int i, regnum; + + if (!crtl->calls_eh_return) + return false; + + for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != INVALID_REGNUM; i++) + if (regno == regnum) + { + return true; + } + + return false; +} + /* Call FN for each register that is saved by the current function. SP_OFFSET is the offset of the current stack pointer from the start of the frame. */ @@ -4844,36 +4887,31 @@ riscv_for_each_saved_reg (poly_int64 sp_offset, riscv_save_restore_fn fn, bool epilogue, bool maybe_eh_return) { HOST_WIDE_INT offset; + unsigned int regno; + unsigned int start = GP_REG_FIRST; + unsigned int limit = GP_REG_LAST; /* Save the link register and s-registers. */ - offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant (); - for (unsigned int regno = GP_REG_FIRST; regno <= GP_REG_LAST; regno++) - if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST)) - { - bool handle_reg = !cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]; - - /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the eh_return - builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as that - would clobber the return value. But we do still need to save them - in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so we - need special handling here. */ - if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return && crtl->calls_eh_return) - { - unsigned int i, regnum; - - for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != INVALID_REGNUM; - i++) - if (regno == regnum) - { - handle_reg = FALSE; - break; - } - } - - if (handle_reg) - riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); - offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD; - } + offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant () + + UNITS_PER_WORD; + for (regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (start, limit, &offset, false); + regno <= limit; + regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (regno, limit, &offset)) + { + if (cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno]) + continue; + + /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the eh_return + builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as that + would clobber the return value. But we do still need to save them + in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so we + need special handling here. */ + if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return + && riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (regno)) + continue; + + riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn); + } /* This loop must iterate over the same space as its companion in riscv_compute_frame_info. */