[x86] PR target/31985: Improve memory operand use with doubleword add.

Message ID 037101d998cb$6aa8f120$3ffad360$@nextmovesoftware.com
State New
Headers
Series [x86] PR target/31985: Improve memory operand use with doubleword add. |

Checks

Context Check Description
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm success Testing passed
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64 success Testing passed

Commit Message

Roger Sayle June 6, 2023, 11:05 p.m. UTC
  This patch addresses the last remaining issue with PR target/31985, that
GCC could make better use of memory addressing modes when implementing
double word addition.  This is achieved by adding a define_insn_and_split
that combines an *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a *concat<mode><dwi>3, so
that the components of the concat can be used directly, without first
being loaded into a double word register.

For test_c in the bugzilla PR:

Before:
        pushl   %ebx
        subl    $16, %esp
        movl    28(%esp), %eax
        movl    36(%esp), %ecx
        movl    32(%esp), %ebx
        movl    24(%esp), %edx
        addl    %ecx, %eax
        adcl    %ebx, %edx
        movl    %eax, 8(%esp)
        movl    %edx, 12(%esp)
        addl    $16, %esp
        popl    %ebx
        ret

After:
test_c:
        subl    $20, %esp
        movl    36(%esp), %eax
        movl    32(%esp), %edx
        addl    28(%esp), %eax
        adcl    24(%esp), %edx
        movl    %eax, 8(%esp)
        movl    %edx, 12(%esp)
        addl    $20, %esp
        ret


If this approach is considered acceptable, similar splitters can be
used for other doubleword operations.

This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32}
with no new failures.  Ok for mainline?

2023-06-07  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>

gcc/ChangeLog
        PR target/31985
        * config/i386/i386.md (*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat): New
        define_insn_and_split combine *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a
        *concat<mode><dwi>3 for more efficient lowering after reload.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
        PR target/31985
        * gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c: New test case.


Roger
--
  

Comments

Uros Bizjak June 7, 2023, 6:32 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 1:05 AM Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com> wrote:
>
>
> This patch addresses the last remaining issue with PR target/31985, that
> GCC could make better use of memory addressing modes when implementing
> double word addition.  This is achieved by adding a define_insn_and_split
> that combines an *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a *concat<mode><dwi>3, so
> that the components of the concat can be used directly, without first
> being loaded into a double word register.
>
> For test_c in the bugzilla PR:
>
> Before:
>         pushl   %ebx
>         subl    $16, %esp
>         movl    28(%esp), %eax
>         movl    36(%esp), %ecx
>         movl    32(%esp), %ebx
>         movl    24(%esp), %edx
>         addl    %ecx, %eax
>         adcl    %ebx, %edx
>         movl    %eax, 8(%esp)
>         movl    %edx, 12(%esp)
>         addl    $16, %esp
>         popl    %ebx
>         ret
>
> After:
> test_c:
>         subl    $20, %esp
>         movl    36(%esp), %eax
>         movl    32(%esp), %edx
>         addl    28(%esp), %eax
>         adcl    24(%esp), %edx
>         movl    %eax, 8(%esp)
>         movl    %edx, 12(%esp)
>         addl    $20, %esp
>         ret
>
>
> If this approach is considered acceptable, similar splitters can be
> used for other doubleword operations.

Yes, the approach looks good to me. But please take care not to
interfere with STV transformations.

> This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
> and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32}
> with no new failures.  Ok for mainline?
>
> 2023-06-07  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
>         PR target/31985
>         * config/i386/i386.md (*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat): New
>         define_insn_and_split combine *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a
>         *concat<mode><dwi>3 for more efficient lowering after reload.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>         PR target/31985
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c: New test case.

OK.

Thanks,
Uros.

>
>
> Roger
> --
>
  
Uros Bizjak June 7, 2023, 7:07 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 8:32 AM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 1:05 AM Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This patch addresses the last remaining issue with PR target/31985, that
> > GCC could make better use of memory addressing modes when implementing
> > double word addition.  This is achieved by adding a define_insn_and_split
> > that combines an *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a *concat<mode><dwi>3, so
> > that the components of the concat can be used directly, without first
> > being loaded into a double word register.
> >
> > For test_c in the bugzilla PR:
> >
> > Before:
> >         pushl   %ebx
> >         subl    $16, %esp
> >         movl    28(%esp), %eax
> >         movl    36(%esp), %ecx
> >         movl    32(%esp), %ebx
> >         movl    24(%esp), %edx
> >         addl    %ecx, %eax
> >         adcl    %ebx, %edx
> >         movl    %eax, 8(%esp)
> >         movl    %edx, 12(%esp)
> >         addl    $16, %esp
> >         popl    %ebx
> >         ret
> >
> > After:
> > test_c:
> >         subl    $20, %esp
> >         movl    36(%esp), %eax
> >         movl    32(%esp), %edx
> >         addl    28(%esp), %eax
> >         adcl    24(%esp), %edx
> >         movl    %eax, 8(%esp)
> >         movl    %edx, 12(%esp)
> >         addl    $20, %esp
> >         ret
> >
> >
> > If this approach is considered acceptable, similar splitters can be
> > used for other doubleword operations.
>
> Yes, the approach looks good to me. But please take care not to
> interfere with STV transformations.

Hm, I have one second thought:

+(define_insn_and_split "*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat"
+  [(set (match_operand:<DWI> 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+ (plus:<DWI>
+  (any_or_plus:<DWI>
+    (ashift:<DWI>
+      (zero_extend:<DWI>
+ (match_operand:DWIH 2 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm"))
+      (match_operand:<DWI> 3 "const_int_operand"))
+    (zero_extend:<DWI>
+      (match_operand:DWIH 4 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm")))
+  (match_operand:<DWI> 1 "register_operand" "0")))
+   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
+  "INTVAL (operands[3]) == <MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT"
+  "#"
+  "&& reload_completed"
+  [(parallel [(set (reg:CCC FLAGS_REG)
+   (compare:CCC
+     (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4))
+     (match_dup 1)))
+      (set (match_dup 0)
+   (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4)))])
+   (parallel [(set (match_dup 5)
+   (plus:DWIH
+     (plus:DWIH
+       (ltu:DWIH (reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0))
+       (match_dup 6))
+     (match_dup 2)))
+      (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
+ "split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[5]);")

The register allocator considers the instruction-to-be-split as one
instruction, so it can allocate output register to match an input
register (or a register that forms an input address), So, you have to
either add an early clobber to the output, or somehow prevent output
to clobber registers in the second pattern.

Uros.

>
> > This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
> > and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32}
> > with no new failures.  Ok for mainline?
> >
> > 2023-06-07  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog
> >         PR target/31985
> >         * config/i386/i386.md (*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat): New
> >         define_insn_and_split combine *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a
> >         *concat<mode><dwi>3 for more efficient lowering after reload.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> >         PR target/31985
> >         * gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c: New test case.
>
> OK.
>
> Thanks,
> Uros.
>
> >
> >
> > Roger
> > --
> >
  
Roger Sayle June 15, 2023, 10:04 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Uros,

> On the 7th June 2023, Uros Bizkak wrote:
> The register allocator considers the instruction-to-be-split as one instruction, so it
> can allocate output register to match an input register (or a register that forms an
> input address), So, you have to either add an early clobber to the output, or
> somehow prevent output to clobber registers in the second pattern.

This implements your suggestion of adding an early clobber to the output, a
one character ('&') change from the previous version of this patch.  Retested
with make bootstrap and make -k check, with and without -m32, to confirm
there are no issues, and this still fixes the pr31985.c test case.

As you've suggested, I'm also working on improving STV in this area.

Ok for mainline?


2023-06-15  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
            Uros Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>

gcc/ChangeLog
        PR target/31985
        * config/i386/i386.md (*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat): New
        define_insn_and_split combine *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a
        *concat<mode><dwi>3 for more efficient lowering after reload.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
        PR target/31985
        * gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c: New test case.

Roger
--
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index e6ebc46..42c302d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -6124,6 +6124,36 @@
 	      (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
  "split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[3]);")
 
+(define_insn_and_split "*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat"
+  [(set (match_operand:<DWI> 0 "register_operand" "=&r")
+	(plus:<DWI>
+	  (any_or_plus:<DWI>
+	    (ashift:<DWI>
+	      (zero_extend:<DWI>
+		(match_operand:DWIH 2 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm"))
+	      (match_operand:<DWI> 3 "const_int_operand"))
+	    (zero_extend:<DWI>
+	      (match_operand:DWIH 4 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm")))
+	  (match_operand:<DWI> 1 "register_operand" "0")))
+   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
+  "INTVAL (operands[3]) == <MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT"
+  "#"
+  "&& reload_completed"
+  [(parallel [(set (reg:CCC FLAGS_REG)
+		   (compare:CCC
+		     (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4))
+		     (match_dup 1)))
+	      (set (match_dup 0)
+		   (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4)))])
+   (parallel [(set (match_dup 5)
+		   (plus:DWIH
+		     (plus:DWIH
+		       (ltu:DWIH (reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0))
+		       (match_dup 6))
+		     (match_dup 2)))
+	      (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
+ "split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[5]);")
+
 (define_insn "*add<mode>_1"
   [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=rm,r,r,r")
 	(plus:SWI48
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6de1b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+void test_c (unsigned int a, unsigned int b, unsigned int c, unsigned int d)
+{
+  volatile unsigned int x, y;
+  unsigned long long __a = b | ((unsigned long long)a << 32);
+  unsigned long long __b = d | ((unsigned long long)c << 32);
+  unsigned long long __c = __a + __b;
+  x = (unsigned int)(__c & 0xffffffff);
+  y = (unsigned int)(__c >> 32);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "movl" 4 } } */
  
Uros Bizjak June 16, 2023, 7:13 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:04 AM Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Uros,
>
> > On the 7th June 2023, Uros Bizkak wrote:
> > The register allocator considers the instruction-to-be-split as one instruction, so it
> > can allocate output register to match an input register (or a register that forms an
> > input address), So, you have to either add an early clobber to the output, or
> > somehow prevent output to clobber registers in the second pattern.
>
> This implements your suggestion of adding an early clobber to the output, a
> one character ('&') change from the previous version of this patch.  Retested
> with make bootstrap and make -k check, with and without -m32, to confirm
> there are no issues, and this still fixes the pr31985.c test case.
>
> As you've suggested, I'm also working on improving STV in this area.
>
> Ok for mainline?
>
>
> 2023-06-15  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
>             Uros Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
>         PR target/31985
>         * config/i386/i386.md (*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat): New
>         define_insn_and_split combine *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a
>         *concat<mode><dwi>3 for more efficient lowering after reload.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>         PR target/31985
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c: New test case.

OK with a small change below.

Thanks,
Uros.

+(define_insn_and_split "*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat"
+  [(set (match_operand:<DWI> 0 "register_operand" "=&r")
+ (plus:<DWI>
+  (any_or_plus:<DWI>
+    (ashift:<DWI>
+      (zero_extend:<DWI>
+ (match_operand:DWIH 2 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm"))
+      (match_operand:<DWI> 3 "const_int_operand"))

The above mode should be QImode, all shifts have QImode on x86.

+    (zero_extend:<DWI>
+      (match_operand:DWIH 4 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm")))
+  (match_operand:<DWI> 1 "register_operand" "0")))
+   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
+  "INTVAL (operands[3]) == <MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT"
+  "#"
+  "&& reload_completed"
+  [(parallel [(set (reg:CCC FLAGS_REG)
+   (compare:CCC
+     (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4))
+     (match_dup 1)))
+      (set (match_dup 0)
+   (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4)))])
+   (parallel [(set (match_dup 5)
+   (plus:DWIH
+     (plus:DWIH
+       (ltu:DWIH (reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0))
+       (match_dup 6))
+     (match_dup 2)))
+      (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
+ "split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[5]);")
+

> Roger
> --
>
  

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index e6ebc46..3592249 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -6124,6 +6124,36 @@ 
 	      (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
  "split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[3]);")
 
+(define_insn_and_split "*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat"
+  [(set (match_operand:<DWI> 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+	(plus:<DWI>
+	  (any_or_plus:<DWI>
+	    (ashift:<DWI>
+	      (zero_extend:<DWI>
+		(match_operand:DWIH 2 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm"))
+	      (match_operand:<DWI> 3 "const_int_operand"))
+	    (zero_extend:<DWI>
+	      (match_operand:DWIH 4 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm")))
+	  (match_operand:<DWI> 1 "register_operand" "0")))
+   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
+  "INTVAL (operands[3]) == <MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT"
+  "#"
+  "&& reload_completed"
+  [(parallel [(set (reg:CCC FLAGS_REG)
+		   (compare:CCC
+		     (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4))
+		     (match_dup 1)))
+	      (set (match_dup 0)
+		   (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4)))])
+   (parallel [(set (match_dup 5)
+		   (plus:DWIH
+		     (plus:DWIH
+		       (ltu:DWIH (reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0))
+		       (match_dup 6))
+		     (match_dup 2)))
+	      (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
+ "split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[5]);")
+
 (define_insn "*add<mode>_1"
   [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=rm,r,r,r")
 	(plus:SWI48
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6de1b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ 
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+void test_c (unsigned int a, unsigned int b, unsigned int c, unsigned int d)
+{
+  volatile unsigned int x, y;
+  unsigned long long __a = b | ((unsigned long long)a << 32);
+  unsigned long long __b = d | ((unsigned long long)c << 32);
+  unsigned long long __c = __a + __b;
+  x = (unsigned int)(__c & 0xffffffff);
+  y = (unsigned int)(__c >> 32);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "movl" 4 } } */