[RFA] Remove a VEC from record-full.c

Message ID 87o9gi7hyp.fsf@tromey.com
State New, archived
Headers

Commit Message

Tom Tromey June 10, 2018, 3:57 p.m. UTC
  >>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> writes:

Simon> You can use one of the overloads of unordered_remove in
Simon> common/gdb_vecs.h to try to preserve the exact same behavior as with
Simon> the VEC.

Thanks, I didn't know about these.

How's this?

Tom

commit d95a705d09f189b29acf6aa06826bb660ae10903
Author: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 7 17:22:49 2018 -0600

    Remove a VEC from record-full.c
    
    This replaces a VEC in record-full.c with a std::vector.
    
    Tested by the buildbot.
    
    gdb/ChangeLog
    2018-06-07  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>
    
            * record-full.c (record_full_breakpoint_p): Remove typedef.  Don't
            declare VEC.
            (record_full_breakpoints): Now a std::vector, static.
            (record_full_sync_record_breakpoints)
            (record_full_init_record_breakpoints)
            (record_full_target::insert_breakpoint)
            (record_full_target::remove_breakpoint): Update.
  

Comments

Simon Marchi June 10, 2018, 9:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2018-06-10 11:57, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> writes:
> 
> Simon> You can use one of the overloads of unordered_remove in
> Simon> common/gdb_vecs.h to try to preserve the exact same behavior as 
> with
> Simon> the VEC.
> 
> Thanks, I didn't know about these.
> 
> How's this?

Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like the 
record_full_breakpoint objects are never freed.  That's not related to 
your patch though, so your patch LGTM.

Simon
  
Tom Tromey June 10, 2018, 10:33 p.m. UTC | #2
>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> writes:

Simon> Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like the
Simon> record_full_breakpoint objects are never freed.  That's not related to
Simon> your patch though, so your patch LGTM.

Thanks for noticing this.  I think this is a good opportunity to fix the
problem, so I'll take a look at that.

Tom
  

Patch

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 37fd0f9e127..2f7b1c883ea 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ 
+2018-06-07  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>
+
+	* record-full.c (record_full_breakpoint_p): Remove typedef.  Don't
+	declare VEC.
+	(record_full_breakpoints): Now a std::vector, static.
+	(record_full_sync_record_breakpoints)
+	(record_full_init_record_breakpoints)
+	(record_full_target::insert_breakpoint)
+	(record_full_target::remove_breakpoint): Update.
+
 2018-06-10  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>
 
 	* tracefile.c (struct trace_file_writer_deleter): New.
diff --git a/gdb/record-full.c b/gdb/record-full.c
index 87c77e06ea9..ab1e265e579 100644
--- a/gdb/record-full.c
+++ b/gdb/record-full.c
@@ -1710,12 +1710,9 @@  struct record_full_breakpoint
   int in_target_beneath;
 };
 
-typedef struct record_full_breakpoint *record_full_breakpoint_p;
-DEF_VEC_P(record_full_breakpoint_p);
-
 /* The list of breakpoints inserted while the record target is
    active.  */
-VEC(record_full_breakpoint_p) *record_full_breakpoints = NULL;
+static std::vector<record_full_breakpoint *> record_full_breakpoints;
 
 static void
 record_full_sync_record_breakpoints (struct bp_location *loc, void *data)
@@ -1732,7 +1729,7 @@  record_full_sync_record_breakpoints (struct bp_location *loc, void *data)
 
       bp->in_target_beneath = 1;
 
-      VEC_safe_push (record_full_breakpoint_p, record_full_breakpoints, bp);
+      record_full_breakpoints.push_back (bp);
     }
 }
 
@@ -1741,7 +1738,7 @@  record_full_sync_record_breakpoints (struct bp_location *loc, void *data)
 static void
 record_full_init_record_breakpoints (void)
 {
-  VEC_free (record_full_breakpoint_p, record_full_breakpoints);
+  record_full_breakpoints.clear ();
 
   iterate_over_bp_locations (record_full_sync_record_breakpoints);
 }
@@ -1754,9 +1751,7 @@  int
 record_full_target::insert_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
 				       struct bp_target_info *bp_tgt)
 {
-  struct record_full_breakpoint *bp;
   int in_target_beneath = 0;
-  int ix;
 
   if (!RECORD_FULL_IS_REPLAY)
     {
@@ -1779,10 +1774,7 @@  record_full_target::insert_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
   /* Use the existing entries if found in order to avoid duplication
      in record_full_breakpoints.  */
 
-  for (ix = 0;
-       VEC_iterate (record_full_breakpoint_p,
-		    record_full_breakpoints, ix, bp);
-       ++ix)
+  for (struct record_full_breakpoint *bp : record_full_breakpoints)
     {
       if (bp->addr == bp_tgt->placed_address
 	  && bp->address_space == bp_tgt->placed_address_space)
@@ -1792,11 +1784,11 @@  record_full_target::insert_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
 	}
     }
 
-  bp = XNEW (struct record_full_breakpoint);
+  struct record_full_breakpoint *bp = XNEW (struct record_full_breakpoint);
   bp->addr = bp_tgt->placed_address;
   bp->address_space = bp_tgt->placed_address_space;
   bp->in_target_beneath = in_target_beneath;
-  VEC_safe_push (record_full_breakpoint_p, record_full_breakpoints, bp);
+  record_full_breakpoints.push_back (bp);
   return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1807,14 +1799,12 @@  record_full_target::remove_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
 				       struct bp_target_info *bp_tgt,
 				       enum remove_bp_reason reason)
 {
-  struct record_full_breakpoint *bp;
-  int ix;
-
-  for (ix = 0;
-       VEC_iterate (record_full_breakpoint_p,
-		    record_full_breakpoints, ix, bp);
-       ++ix)
+  for (auto iter = record_full_breakpoints.begin ();
+       iter != record_full_breakpoints.end ();
+       ++iter)
     {
+      struct record_full_breakpoint *bp = *iter;
+
       if (bp->addr == bp_tgt->placed_address
 	  && bp->address_space == bp_tgt->placed_address_space)
 	{
@@ -1830,10 +1820,7 @@  record_full_target::remove_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
 	    }
 
 	  if (reason == REMOVE_BREAKPOINT)
-	    {
-	      VEC_unordered_remove (record_full_breakpoint_p,
-				    record_full_breakpoints, ix);
-	    }
+	    unordered_remove (record_full_breakpoints, iter);
 	  return 0;
 	}
     }