[02/11] gdb/gdbsupport/gdbserver: Require c++17

Message ID 20231013144418.3180617-3-lancelot.six@amd.com
State New
Headers
Series GDB: Require C++17 |

Checks

Context Check Description
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_build--master-arm fail Patch failed to apply
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_build--master-aarch64 fail Patch failed to apply
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64 fail Patch failed to apply

Commit Message

Lancelot SIX Oct. 13, 2023, 2:44 p.m. UTC
  This patch proposes to require a C++17 compiler to build gdb /
gdbsupport / gdbserver.  Before this patch, GDB required a C++11
compiler.

The general policy regarding bumping C++ language requirement in GDB (as
stated in [1]) is:

    Our general policy is to wait until the oldest compiler that
    supports C++NN is at least 3 years old.

    Rationale: We want to ensure reasonably widespread compiler
    availability, to lower barrier of entry to GDB contributions, and to
    make it easy for users to easily build new GDB on currently
    supported stable distributions themselves. 3 years should be
    sufficient for latest stable releases of distributions to include a
    compiler for the standard, and/or for new compilers to appear as
    easily installable optional packages. Requiring everyone to build a
    compiler first before building GDB, which would happen if we
    required a too-new compiler, would cause too much inconvenience.

    See the policy proposal and discussion
    [here](https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-10/msg00616.html).

The first GCC release which with full C++17 support is GCC-9[2],
released in 2019[3], which is over 4 years ago.  Clang has had C++17
support since Clang-5[4] released in 2018[5].

A discussions with many distros showed that a C++17-able compiler is
always available, meaning that this no hard requirement preventing us to
require it going forward.

[1] https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20GDB-C-Coding-Standards#When_is_GDB_going_to_start_requiring_C.2B-.2B-NN_.3F
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx17
[3] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/
[4] https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html
[5] https://releases.llvm.org/

Change-Id: Id596f5db17ea346e8a978668825787b3a9a443fd
---
 gdb/NEWS                |    3 +
 gdb/config.in           |    4 +-
 gdb/configure           | 1970 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 gdb/configure.ac        |    4 +-
 gdbserver/config.in     |    4 +-
 gdbserver/configure     | 1970 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 gdbserver/configure.ac  |    4 +-
 gdbsupport/Makefile.in  |    2 +-
 gdbsupport/config.in    |    4 +-
 gdbsupport/configure    | 1970 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 gdbsupport/configure.ac |    4 +-
 11 files changed, 5212 insertions(+), 727 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Eli Zaretskii Oct. 13, 2023, 3:21 p.m. UTC | #1
> From: Lancelot Six <lancelot.six@amd.com>
> CC: Lancelot Six <lancelot.six@amd.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:44:09 +0000
> 
> This patch proposes to require a C++17 compiler to build gdb /
> gdbsupport / gdbserver.  Before this patch, GDB required a C++11
> compiler.
> 
> The general policy regarding bumping C++ language requirement in GDB (as
> stated in [1]) is:
> 
>     Our general policy is to wait until the oldest compiler that
>     supports C++NN is at least 3 years old.
> 
>     Rationale: We want to ensure reasonably widespread compiler
>     availability, to lower barrier of entry to GDB contributions, and to
>     make it easy for users to easily build new GDB on currently
>     supported stable distributions themselves. 3 years should be
>     sufficient for latest stable releases of distributions to include a
>     compiler for the standard, and/or for new compilers to appear as
>     easily installable optional packages. Requiring everyone to build a
>     compiler first before building GDB, which would happen if we
>     required a too-new compiler, would cause too much inconvenience.
> 
>     See the policy proposal and discussion
>     [here](https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-10/msg00616.html).
> 
> The first GCC release which with full C++17 support is GCC-9[2],
> released in 2019[3], which is over 4 years ago.  Clang has had C++17
> support since Clang-5[4] released in 2018[5].
> 
> A discussions with many distros showed that a C++17-able compiler is
> always available, meaning that this no hard requirement preventing us to
> require it going forward.
> 
> [1] https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20GDB-C-Coding-Standards#When_is_GDB_going_to_start_requiring_C.2B-.2B-NN_.3F
> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx17
> [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/
> [4] https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html
> [5] https://releases.llvm.org/
> 
> Change-Id: Id596f5db17ea346e8a978668825787b3a9a443fd
> ---
>  gdb/NEWS                |    3 +
>  gdb/config.in           |    4 +-
>  gdb/configure           | 1970 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  gdb/configure.ac        |    4 +-
>  gdbserver/config.in     |    4 +-
>  gdbserver/configure     | 1970 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  gdbserver/configure.ac  |    4 +-
>  gdbsupport/Makefile.in  |    2 +-
>  gdbsupport/config.in    |    4 +-
>  gdbsupport/configure    | 1970 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  gdbsupport/configure.ac |    4 +-
>  11 files changed, 5212 insertions(+), 727 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
> index 81264c0cfb3..8ab2e4c593a 100644
> --- a/gdb/NEWS
> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
>  
>  *** Changes since GDB 14
>  
> +* Building GDB and GDBserver now requires a C++17 compiler.
> +  For example, GCC 9 or later.
> +
>  * GDB index now contains information about the main function. This speeds up
>    startup when it is being used for some large binaries.

The NEWS part is okay, thanks.

Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
  
Pedro Alves Oct. 16, 2023, 9:50 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2023-10-13 15:44, Lancelot Six wrote:

> ---
>  gdb/NEWS                |    3 +
>  gdb/config.in           |    4 +-
>  gdb/configure           | 1970 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  gdb/configure.ac        |    4 +-
>  gdbserver/config.in     |    4 +-
>  gdbserver/configure     | 1970 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  gdbserver/configure.ac  |    4 +-
>  gdbsupport/Makefile.in  |    2 +-
>  gdbsupport/config.in    |    4 +-
>  gdbsupport/configure    | 1970 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  gdbsupport/configure.ac |    4 +-


There's another spot that needs C++11 -> C++17 -- gdb/README:

 ...
    GDB requires a C++11 compiler.  If you do not have a
 C++11 compiler for your system, you may be able to download and install
 ...
  

Patch

diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
index 81264c0cfb3..8ab2e4c593a 100644
--- a/gdb/NEWS
+++ b/gdb/NEWS
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ 
 
 *** Changes since GDB 14
 
+* Building GDB and GDBserver now requires a C++17 compiler.
+  For example, GCC 9 or later.
+
 * GDB index now contains information about the main function. This speeds up
   startup when it is being used for some large binaries.
 
diff --git a/gdb/config.in b/gdb/config.in
index e17245156d8..f8926fe4404 100644
--- a/gdb/config.in
+++ b/gdb/config.in
@@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ 
 /* Define to 1 if you have the <curses.h> header file. */
 #undef HAVE_CURSES_H
 
-/* define if the compiler supports basic C++11 syntax */
-#undef HAVE_CXX11
+/* define if the compiler supports basic C++17 syntax */
+#undef HAVE_CXX17
 
 /* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE', and to 0 if
    you don't. */
diff --git a/gdb/configure b/gdb/configure
index 408d8a50423..0878481e354 100755
--- a/gdb/configure
+++ b/gdb/configure
@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@  CCDEPMODE
 DEPDIR
 am__leading_dot
 CXX_DIALECT
-HAVE_CXX11
+HAVE_CXX17
 CXXCPP
 OTOOL64
 OTOOL
@@ -16491,9 +16491,9 @@  exec 5>>config.log
 $lt_cl_success || as_fn_exit 1
 
 
-# We require a C++11 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
+# We require a C++17 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
 # necessary, set CXX_DIALECT to some -std=xxx switch.
-  ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="11 0x"    ax_cxx_compile_cxx11_required=true
+  ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="17 1z"    ax_cxx_compile_cxx17_required=true
   ac_ext=cpp
 ac_cpp='$CXXCPP $CPPFLAGS'
 ac_compile='$CXX -c $CXXFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
@@ -16502,9 +16502,9 @@  ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_cxx_compiler_gnu
   CXX_DIALECT=""
   ac_success=no
 
-      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features by default" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features by default... " >&6; }
-if ${ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11+:} false; then :
+      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features by default" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features by default... " >&6; }
+if ${ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17+:} false; then :
   $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
 else
   cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
@@ -16801,32 +16801,1362 @@  namespace cxx11
 
 
 
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx14
+{
+
+  namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
+        const auto istiny = [](auto x){
+          return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
+        };
+        const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
+        return aretiny[0];
+      };
+      return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_binary_literals
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
+    static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_generalized_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    constexpr unsigned long
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      auto length = 0UL;
+      for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
+        ++length;
+      return length;
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_init_capture
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
+      const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
+      return lambda2();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_digit_separators
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
+    static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_return_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    auto f(int& x) { return x; }
+    decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = true;
+    };
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
+      return x;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx14
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
+{
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
+  {
+
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
+  {
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
+  {
+
+    static_assert (true);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
+
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
+  }
+
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
+  {
+
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
+    {
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct base1
+    {
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
+    };
+
+    struct base2
+    {
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
+    };
+
+    struct derived : base1, base2
+    {
+        int d;
+    };
+
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
+  {
+
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
+
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
+
+    struct sentinel
+    {
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
+    }
+
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return !(i == s);
+    }
+
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
+  {
+
+    struct t
+    {
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
+  {
+
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
+    {
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
+  {
+
+    int f()
+    {
+      return 13;
+    }
+
+    int f2()
+    {
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
+  {
+
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
+    {
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
+
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
+  {
+
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
+
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
+  {
+
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
+    {
+      return arr;
+    }
+
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
+    {
+      return pr;
+    }
+
+    struct S
+    {
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
+    };
+
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
+    }
+
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
+  {
+
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
+
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
+
+    template<typename T>
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
+
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
+
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_inline_variables
+  {
+
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
+
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
+
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
+
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx17
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+
+
+_ACEOF
+if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"; then :
+  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17=yes
+else
+  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17=no
+fi
+rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
+fi
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17" >&5
+$as_echo "$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17" >&6; }
+    if test x$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17 = xyes; then
+      ac_success=yes
+    fi
+
+    if test x$ac_success = xno; then
+    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
+      switch="-std=gnu++${alternative}"
+      cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
+      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch... " >&6; }
+if eval \${$cachevar+:} false; then :
+  $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
+else
+  ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
+         CXX="$CXX $switch"
+         cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
+/* end confdefs.h.  */
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++11, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+// MSVC always sets __cplusplus to 199711L in older versions; newer versions
+// only set it correctly if /Zc:__cplusplus is specified as well as a
+// /std:c++NN switch:
+// https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/
+#elif __cplusplus < 201103L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++11 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx11
+{
+
+  namespace test_static_assert
+  {
+
+    template <typename T>
+    struct check
+    {
+      static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough");
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_final_override
+  {
+
+    struct Base
+    {
+      virtual ~Base() {}
+      virtual void f() {}
+    };
+
+    struct Derived : public Base
+    {
+      virtual ~Derived() override {}
+      virtual void f() override {}
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_double_right_angle_brackets
+  {
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct check {};
+
+    typedef check<void> single_type;
+    typedef check<check<void>> double_type;
+    typedef check<check<check<void>>> triple_type;
+    typedef check<check<check<check<void>>>> quadruple_type;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_decltype
+  {
+
+    int
+    f()
+    {
+      int a = 1;
+      decltype(a) b = 2;
+      return a + b;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static const bool value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static const bool value = true;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    auto
+    add(T1 a1, T2 a2) -> decltype(a1 + a2)
+    {
+      return a1 + a2;
+    }
+
+    int
+    test(const int c, volatile int v)
+    {
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(0)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(c)>::value == false, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(v)>::value == false, "");
+      auto ac = c;
+      auto av = v;
+      auto sumi = ac + av + 'x';
+      auto sumf = ac + av + 1.0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(ac)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(av)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumi)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumf)>::value == false, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(add(c, v))>::value == true, "");
+      return (sumf > 0.0) ? sumi : add(c, v);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_noexcept
+  {
+
+    int f() { return 0; }
+    int g() noexcept { return 0; }
+
+    static_assert(noexcept(f()) == false, "");
+    static_assert(noexcept(g()) == true, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    unsigned long constexpr
+    strlen_c_r(const CharT *const s, const unsigned long acc) noexcept
+    {
+      return *s ? strlen_c_r(s + 1, acc + 1) : acc;
+    }
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    unsigned long constexpr
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      return strlen_c_r(s, 0UL);
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("1") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("example") == 7UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0example") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_rvalue_references
+  {
+
+    template < int N >
+    struct answer
+    {
+      static constexpr int value = N;
+    };
+
+    answer<1> f(int&)       { return answer<1>(); }
+    answer<2> f(const int&) { return answer<2>(); }
+    answer<3> f(int&&)      { return answer<3>(); }
+
+    void
+    test()
+    {
+      int i = 0;
+      const int c = 0;
+      static_assert(decltype(f(i))::value == 1, "");
+      static_assert(decltype(f(c))::value == 2, "");
+      static_assert(decltype(f(0))::value == 3, "");
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_uniform_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct test
+    {
+      static const int zero {};
+      static const int one {1};
+    };
+
+    static_assert(test::zero == 0, "");
+    static_assert(test::one == 1, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambdas
+  {
+
+    void
+    test1()
+    {
+      auto lambda1 = [](){};
+      auto lambda2 = lambda1;
+      lambda1();
+      lambda2();
+    }
+
+    int
+    test2()
+    {
+      auto a = [](int i, int j){ return i + j; }(1, 2);
+      auto b = []() -> int { return '0'; }();
+      auto c = [=](){ return a + b; }();
+      auto d = [&](){ return c; }();
+      auto e = [a, &b](int x) mutable {
+        const auto identity = [](int y){ return y; };
+        for (auto i = 0; i < a; ++i)
+          a += b--;
+        return x + identity(a + b);
+      }(0);
+      return a + b + c + d + e;
+    }
+
+    int
+    test3()
+    {
+      const auto nullary = [](){ return 0; };
+      const auto unary = [](int x){ return x; };
+      using nullary_t = decltype(nullary);
+      using unary_t = decltype(unary);
+      const auto higher1st = [](nullary_t f){ return f(); };
+      const auto higher2nd = [unary](nullary_t f1){
+        return [unary, f1](unary_t f2){ return f2(unary(f1())); };
+      };
+      return higher1st(nullary) + higher2nd(nullary)(unary);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_variadic_templates
+  {
+
+    template <int...>
+    struct sum;
+
+    template <int N0, int... N1toN>
+    struct sum<N0, N1toN...>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = N0 + sum<N1toN...>::value;
+    };
+
+    template <>
+    struct sum<>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = 0;
+    };
+
+    static_assert(sum<>::value == 0, "");
+    static_assert(sum<1>::value == 1, "");
+    static_assert(sum<23>::value == 23, "");
+    static_assert(sum<1, 2>::value == 3, "");
+    static_assert(sum<5, 5, 11>::value == 21, "");
+    static_assert(sum<2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13>::value == 41, "");
+
+  }
+
+  // http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13728184/template-aliases-and-sfinae
+  // Clang 3.1 fails with headers of libstd++ 4.8.3 when using std::function
+  // because of this.
+  namespace test_template_alias_sfinae
+  {
+
+    struct foo {};
+
+    template<typename T>
+    using member = typename T::member_type;
+
+    template<typename T>
+    void func(...) {}
+
+    template<typename T>
+    void func(member<T>*) {}
+
+    void test();
+
+    void test() { func<foo>(0); }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx11
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201103L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx14
+{
+
+  namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
+        const auto istiny = [](auto x){
+          return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
+        };
+        const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
+        return aretiny[0];
+      };
+      return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_binary_literals
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
+    static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_generalized_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    constexpr unsigned long
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      auto length = 0UL;
+      for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
+        ++length;
+      return length;
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_init_capture
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
+      const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
+      return lambda2();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_digit_separators
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
+    static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_return_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    auto f(int& x) { return x; }
+    decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = true;
+    };
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
+      return x;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx14
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
+{
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
+  {
+
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
+  {
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
+  {
+
+    static_assert (true);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
+
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
+  }
+
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
+  {
+
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
+    {
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct base1
+    {
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
+    };
+
+    struct base2
+    {
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
+    };
+
+    struct derived : base1, base2
+    {
+        int d;
+    };
+
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
+  {
+
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
+
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
+
+    struct sentinel
+    {
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
+    }
+
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return !(i == s);
+    }
+
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
+  {
+
+    struct t
+    {
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
+  {
+
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
+    {
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
+  {
+
+    int f()
+    {
+      return 13;
+    }
+
+    int f2()
+    {
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
+  {
+
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
+    {
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
+
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
+  {
+
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
+
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
+  {
+
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
+    {
+      return arr;
+    }
+
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
+    {
+      return pr;
+    }
+
+    struct S
+    {
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
+    };
+
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
+    }
+
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
+  {
+
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
+
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
+
+    template<typename T>
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
+
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
+
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_inline_variables
+  {
+
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
+
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
+
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
+
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx17
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+
+
 _ACEOF
 if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"; then :
-  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11=yes
+  eval $cachevar=yes
 else
-  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11=no
+  eval $cachevar=no
 fi
 rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
+         CXX="$ac_save_CXX"
 fi
-{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11" >&5
-$as_echo "$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11" >&6; }
-    if test x$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11 = xyes; then
-      ac_success=yes
-    fi
+eval ac_res=\$$cachevar
+	       { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ac_res" >&5
+$as_echo "$ac_res" >&6; }
+      if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then
+        CXX_DIALECT="$switch"
+        CXX="$CXX $switch"
+        if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then
+          CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch"
+        fi
+        ac_success=yes
+        break
+      fi
+    done
+  fi
 
     if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
-      switch="-std=gnu++${alternative}"
-      cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
-      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch... " >&6; }
+                    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
+      for switch in -std=c++${alternative} +std=c++${alternative} "-h std=c++${alternative}" MSVC; do
+        if test x"$switch" = xMSVC; then
+                                        switch=-std:c++${alternative}
+          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17_${switch}_MSVC" | $as_tr_sh`
+        else
+          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
+        fi
+        { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch... " >&6; }
 if eval \${$cachevar+:} false; then :
   $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
 else
   ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
-         CXX="$CXX $switch"
-         cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
+           CXX="$CXX $switch"
+           cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
 /* end confdefs.h.  */
 
 
@@ -17120,337 +18450,501 @@  namespace cxx11
 
 
 
-_ACEOF
-if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"; then :
-  eval $cachevar=yes
-else
-  eval $cachevar=no
-fi
-rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
-         CXX="$ac_save_CXX"
-fi
-eval ac_res=\$$cachevar
-	       { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ac_res" >&5
-$as_echo "$ac_res" >&6; }
-      if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then
-        CXX_DIALECT="$switch"
-        CXX="$CXX $switch"
-        if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then
-          CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch"
-        fi
-        ac_success=yes
-        break
-      fi
-    done
-  fi
 
-    if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-                    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
-      for switch in -std=c++${alternative} +std=c++${alternative} "-h std=c++${alternative}" MSVC; do
-        if test x"$switch" = xMSVC; then
-                                        switch=-std:c++${alternative}
-          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11_${switch}_MSVC" | $as_tr_sh`
-        else
-          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
-        fi
-        { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch... " >&6; }
-if eval \${$cachevar+:} false; then :
-  $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
-else
-  ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
-           CXX="$CXX $switch"
-           cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
-/* end confdefs.h.  */
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx14
+{
+
+  namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
+        const auto istiny = [](auto x){
+          return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
+        };
+        const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
+        return aretiny[0];
+      };
+      return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_binary_literals
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
+    static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_generalized_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    constexpr unsigned long
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      auto length = 0UL;
+      for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
+        ++length;
+      return length;
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_init_capture
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
+      const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
+      return lambda2();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_digit_separators
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
+    static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_return_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    auto f(int& x) { return x; }
+    decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = true;
+    };
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
+      return x;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx14
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
+
+
 
 
-// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++11, why torture it?
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
 // Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
 
 #ifndef __cplusplus
 
 #error "This is not a C++ compiler"
 
-// MSVC always sets __cplusplus to 199711L in older versions; newer versions
-// only set it correctly if /Zc:__cplusplus is specified as well as a
-// /std:c++NN switch:
-// https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/
-#elif __cplusplus < 201103L && !defined _MSC_VER
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
 
-#error "This is not a C++11 compiler"
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
 
 #else
 
-namespace cxx11
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
 {
 
-  namespace test_static_assert
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
   {
 
-    template <typename T>
-    struct check
-    {
-      static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough");
-    };
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_final_override
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
   {
 
-    struct Base
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
     {
-      virtual ~Base() {}
-      virtual void f() {}
-    };
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
 
-    struct Derived : public Base
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
     {
-      virtual ~Derived() override {}
-      virtual void f() override {}
-    };
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_double_right_angle_brackets
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
   {
 
-    template < typename T >
-    struct check {};
+    static_assert (true);
 
-    typedef check<void> single_type;
-    typedef check<check<void>> double_type;
-    typedef check<check<check<void>>> triple_type;
-    typedef check<check<check<check<void>>>> quadruple_type;
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
 
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
   }
 
-  namespace test_decltype
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
   {
 
-    int
-    f()
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
     {
-      int a = 1;
-      decltype(a) b = 2;
-      return a + b;
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
     }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_type_deduction
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
   {
 
-    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
-    struct is_same
+    struct base1
     {
-      static const bool value = false;
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
     };
 
-    template < typename T >
-    struct is_same<T, T>
+    struct base2
     {
-      static const bool value = true;
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
     };
 
-    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
-    auto
-    add(T1 a1, T2 a2) -> decltype(a1 + a2)
+    struct derived : base1, base2
     {
-      return a1 + a2;
-    }
+        int d;
+    };
 
-    int
-    test(const int c, volatile int v)
-    {
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(0)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(c)>::value == false, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(v)>::value == false, "");
-      auto ac = c;
-      auto av = v;
-      auto sumi = ac + av + 'x';
-      auto sumf = ac + av + 1.0;
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(ac)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(av)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumi)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumf)>::value == false, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(add(c, v))>::value == true, "");
-      return (sumf > 0.0) ? sumi : add(c, v);
-    }
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_noexcept
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
   {
 
-    int f() { return 0; }
-    int g() noexcept { return 0; }
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
 
-    static_assert(noexcept(f()) == false, "");
-    static_assert(noexcept(g()) == true, "");
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
 
-  }
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
 
-  namespace test_constexpr
-  {
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
 
-    template < typename CharT >
-    unsigned long constexpr
-    strlen_c_r(const CharT *const s, const unsigned long acc) noexcept
+    struct sentinel
     {
-      return *s ? strlen_c_r(s + 1, acc + 1) : acc;
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
     }
 
-    template < typename CharT >
-    unsigned long constexpr
-    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
     {
-      return strlen_c_r(s, 0UL);
+      return !(i == s);
     }
 
-    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("1") == 1UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("example") == 7UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0example") == 7UL, "");
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
+    }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_rvalue_references
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
   {
 
-    template < int N >
-    struct answer
+    struct t
     {
-      static constexpr int value = N;
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
     };
 
-    answer<1> f(int&)       { return answer<1>(); }
-    answer<2> f(const int&) { return answer<2>(); }
-    answer<3> f(int&&)      { return answer<3>(); }
+  }
 
-    void
-    test()
-    {
-      int i = 0;
-      const int c = 0;
-      static_assert(decltype(f(i))::value == 1, "");
-      static_assert(decltype(f(c))::value == 2, "");
-      static_assert(decltype(f(0))::value == 3, "");
-    }
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_uniform_initialization
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
   {
 
-    struct test
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
     {
-      static const int zero {};
-      static const int one {1};
-    };
-
-    static_assert(test::zero == 0, "");
-    static_assert(test::one == 1, "");
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
+    }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_lambdas
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
   {
 
-    void
-    test1()
+    int f()
     {
-      auto lambda1 = [](){};
-      auto lambda2 = lambda1;
-      lambda1();
-      lambda2();
+      return 13;
     }
 
-    int
-    test2()
+    int f2()
     {
-      auto a = [](int i, int j){ return i + j; }(1, 2);
-      auto b = []() -> int { return '0'; }();
-      auto c = [=](){ return a + b; }();
-      auto d = [&](){ return c; }();
-      auto e = [a, &b](int x) mutable {
-        const auto identity = [](int y){ return y; };
-        for (auto i = 0; i < a; ++i)
-          a += b--;
-        return x + identity(a + b);
-      }(0);
-      return a + b + c + d + e;
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
     }
 
-    int
-    test3()
+  }
+
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
+  {
+
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
     {
-      const auto nullary = [](){ return 0; };
-      const auto unary = [](int x){ return x; };
-      using nullary_t = decltype(nullary);
-      using unary_t = decltype(unary);
-      const auto higher1st = [](nullary_t f){ return f(); };
-      const auto higher2nd = [unary](nullary_t f1){
-        return [unary, f1](unary_t f2){ return f2(unary(f1())); };
-      };
-      return higher1st(nullary) + higher2nd(nullary)(unary);
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
+
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
     }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_variadic_templates
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
   {
 
-    template <int...>
-    struct sum;
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
 
-    template <int N0, int... N1toN>
-    struct sum<N0, N1toN...>
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
+  {
+
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
     {
-      static constexpr auto value = N0 + sum<N1toN...>::value;
-    };
+      return arr;
+    }
 
-    template <>
-    struct sum<>
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
     {
-      static constexpr auto value = 0;
+      return pr;
+    }
+
+    struct S
+    {
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
     };
 
-    static_assert(sum<>::value == 0, "");
-    static_assert(sum<1>::value == 1, "");
-    static_assert(sum<23>::value == 23, "");
-    static_assert(sum<1, 2>::value == 3, "");
-    static_assert(sum<5, 5, 11>::value == 21, "");
-    static_assert(sum<2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13>::value == 41, "");
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
+    }
+
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
 
   }
 
-  // http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13728184/template-aliases-and-sfinae
-  // Clang 3.1 fails with headers of libstd++ 4.8.3 when using std::function
-  // because of this.
-  namespace test_template_alias_sfinae
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
   {
 
-    struct foo {};
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
 
-    template<typename T>
-    using member = typename T::member_type;
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
 
     template<typename T>
-    void func(...) {}
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
 
-    template<typename T>
-    void func(member<T>*) {}
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
 
-    void test();
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
 
-    void test() { func<foo>(0); }
+  }
+
+  namespace test_inline_variables
+  {
+
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
+
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
+
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
+
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
 
   }
 
-}  // namespace cxx11
+}  // namespace cxx17
 
-#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201103L
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
 
 
 
@@ -17487,19 +18981,19 @@  ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
 ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5'
 ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu
 
-  if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx11_required = xtrue; then
+  if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx17_required = xtrue; then
     if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-      as_fn_error $? "*** A compiler with support for C++11 language features is required." "$LINENO" 5
+      as_fn_error $? "*** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required." "$LINENO" 5
     fi
   fi
   if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-    HAVE_CXX11=0
-    { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: No compiler with C++11 support was found" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: No compiler with C++11 support was found" >&6;}
+    HAVE_CXX17=0
+    { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: No compiler with C++17 support was found" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: No compiler with C++17 support was found" >&6;}
   else
-    HAVE_CXX11=1
+    HAVE_CXX17=1
 
-$as_echo "#define HAVE_CXX11 1" >>confdefs.h
+$as_echo "#define HAVE_CXX17 1" >>confdefs.h
 
   fi
 
diff --git a/gdb/configure.ac b/gdb/configure.ac
index 3912b77b27f..43e5067e6ff 100644
--- a/gdb/configure.ac
+++ b/gdb/configure.ac
@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@  LT_INIT
 # link tests in the configure script.
 LT_OUTPUT
 
-# We require a C++11 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
+# We require a C++17 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
 # necessary, set CXX_DIALECT to some -std=xxx switch.
-AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(11, , mandatory)
+AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(17, , mandatory)
 
 # Dependency checking.
 ZW_CREATE_DEPDIR
diff --git a/gdbserver/config.in b/gdbserver/config.in
index 63876afcf85..ab507aa6f6a 100644
--- a/gdbserver/config.in
+++ b/gdbserver/config.in
@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ 
 /* Define to 1 if you have the <arpa/inet.h> header file. */
 #undef HAVE_ARPA_INET_H
 
-/* define if the compiler supports basic C++11 syntax */
-#undef HAVE_CXX11
+/* define if the compiler supports basic C++17 syntax */
+#undef HAVE_CXX17
 
 /* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE', and to 0 if
    you don't. */
diff --git a/gdbserver/configure b/gdbserver/configure
index a49598fb682..c6b8d7803c4 100755
--- a/gdbserver/configure
+++ b/gdbserver/configure
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@  ax_pthread_config
 SED
 ALLOCA
 CXX_DIALECT
-HAVE_CXX11
+HAVE_CXX17
 RANLIB
 AR
 INSTALL_DATA
@@ -5007,10 +5007,10 @@  ac_script='s/[\\$]/&&/g;s/;s,x,x,$//'
 program_transform_name=`$as_echo "$program_transform_name" | sed "$ac_script"`
 
 
-# We require a C++11 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
+# We require a C++17 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
 # necessary, set CXX_DIALECT to some -std=xxx switch.
 
-  ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="11 0x"    ax_cxx_compile_cxx11_required=true
+  ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="17 1z"    ax_cxx_compile_cxx17_required=true
   ac_ext=cpp
 ac_cpp='$CXXCPP $CPPFLAGS'
 ac_compile='$CXX -c $CXXFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
@@ -5019,9 +5019,9 @@  ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_cxx_compiler_gnu
   CXX_DIALECT=""
   ac_success=no
 
-      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features by default" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features by default... " >&6; }
-if ${ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11+:} false; then :
+      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features by default" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features by default... " >&6; }
+if ${ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17+:} false; then :
   $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
 else
   cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
@@ -5318,32 +5318,1362 @@  namespace cxx11
 
 
 
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx14
+{
+
+  namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
+        const auto istiny = [](auto x){
+          return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
+        };
+        const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
+        return aretiny[0];
+      };
+      return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_binary_literals
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
+    static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_generalized_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    constexpr unsigned long
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      auto length = 0UL;
+      for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
+        ++length;
+      return length;
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_init_capture
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
+      const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
+      return lambda2();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_digit_separators
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
+    static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_return_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    auto f(int& x) { return x; }
+    decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = true;
+    };
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
+      return x;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx14
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
+{
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
+  {
+
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
+  {
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
+  {
+
+    static_assert (true);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
+
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
+  }
+
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
+  {
+
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
+    {
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct base1
+    {
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
+    };
+
+    struct base2
+    {
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
+    };
+
+    struct derived : base1, base2
+    {
+        int d;
+    };
+
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
+  {
+
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
+
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
+
+    struct sentinel
+    {
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
+    }
+
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return !(i == s);
+    }
+
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
+  {
+
+    struct t
+    {
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
+  {
+
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
+    {
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
+  {
+
+    int f()
+    {
+      return 13;
+    }
+
+    int f2()
+    {
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
+  {
+
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
+    {
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
+
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
+  {
+
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
+
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
+  {
+
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
+    {
+      return arr;
+    }
+
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
+    {
+      return pr;
+    }
+
+    struct S
+    {
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
+    };
+
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
+    }
+
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
+  {
+
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
+
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
+
+    template<typename T>
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
+
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
+
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_inline_variables
+  {
+
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
+
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
+
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
+
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx17
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+
+
+_ACEOF
+if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"; then :
+  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17=yes
+else
+  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17=no
+fi
+rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
+fi
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17" >&5
+$as_echo "$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17" >&6; }
+    if test x$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17 = xyes; then
+      ac_success=yes
+    fi
+
+    if test x$ac_success = xno; then
+    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
+      switch="-std=gnu++${alternative}"
+      cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
+      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch... " >&6; }
+if eval \${$cachevar+:} false; then :
+  $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
+else
+  ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
+         CXX="$CXX $switch"
+         cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
+/* end confdefs.h.  */
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++11, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+// MSVC always sets __cplusplus to 199711L in older versions; newer versions
+// only set it correctly if /Zc:__cplusplus is specified as well as a
+// /std:c++NN switch:
+// https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/
+#elif __cplusplus < 201103L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++11 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx11
+{
+
+  namespace test_static_assert
+  {
+
+    template <typename T>
+    struct check
+    {
+      static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough");
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_final_override
+  {
+
+    struct Base
+    {
+      virtual ~Base() {}
+      virtual void f() {}
+    };
+
+    struct Derived : public Base
+    {
+      virtual ~Derived() override {}
+      virtual void f() override {}
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_double_right_angle_brackets
+  {
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct check {};
+
+    typedef check<void> single_type;
+    typedef check<check<void>> double_type;
+    typedef check<check<check<void>>> triple_type;
+    typedef check<check<check<check<void>>>> quadruple_type;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_decltype
+  {
+
+    int
+    f()
+    {
+      int a = 1;
+      decltype(a) b = 2;
+      return a + b;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static const bool value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static const bool value = true;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    auto
+    add(T1 a1, T2 a2) -> decltype(a1 + a2)
+    {
+      return a1 + a2;
+    }
+
+    int
+    test(const int c, volatile int v)
+    {
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(0)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(c)>::value == false, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(v)>::value == false, "");
+      auto ac = c;
+      auto av = v;
+      auto sumi = ac + av + 'x';
+      auto sumf = ac + av + 1.0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(ac)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(av)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumi)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumf)>::value == false, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(add(c, v))>::value == true, "");
+      return (sumf > 0.0) ? sumi : add(c, v);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_noexcept
+  {
+
+    int f() { return 0; }
+    int g() noexcept { return 0; }
+
+    static_assert(noexcept(f()) == false, "");
+    static_assert(noexcept(g()) == true, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    unsigned long constexpr
+    strlen_c_r(const CharT *const s, const unsigned long acc) noexcept
+    {
+      return *s ? strlen_c_r(s + 1, acc + 1) : acc;
+    }
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    unsigned long constexpr
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      return strlen_c_r(s, 0UL);
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("1") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("example") == 7UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0example") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_rvalue_references
+  {
+
+    template < int N >
+    struct answer
+    {
+      static constexpr int value = N;
+    };
+
+    answer<1> f(int&)       { return answer<1>(); }
+    answer<2> f(const int&) { return answer<2>(); }
+    answer<3> f(int&&)      { return answer<3>(); }
+
+    void
+    test()
+    {
+      int i = 0;
+      const int c = 0;
+      static_assert(decltype(f(i))::value == 1, "");
+      static_assert(decltype(f(c))::value == 2, "");
+      static_assert(decltype(f(0))::value == 3, "");
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_uniform_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct test
+    {
+      static const int zero {};
+      static const int one {1};
+    };
+
+    static_assert(test::zero == 0, "");
+    static_assert(test::one == 1, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambdas
+  {
+
+    void
+    test1()
+    {
+      auto lambda1 = [](){};
+      auto lambda2 = lambda1;
+      lambda1();
+      lambda2();
+    }
+
+    int
+    test2()
+    {
+      auto a = [](int i, int j){ return i + j; }(1, 2);
+      auto b = []() -> int { return '0'; }();
+      auto c = [=](){ return a + b; }();
+      auto d = [&](){ return c; }();
+      auto e = [a, &b](int x) mutable {
+        const auto identity = [](int y){ return y; };
+        for (auto i = 0; i < a; ++i)
+          a += b--;
+        return x + identity(a + b);
+      }(0);
+      return a + b + c + d + e;
+    }
+
+    int
+    test3()
+    {
+      const auto nullary = [](){ return 0; };
+      const auto unary = [](int x){ return x; };
+      using nullary_t = decltype(nullary);
+      using unary_t = decltype(unary);
+      const auto higher1st = [](nullary_t f){ return f(); };
+      const auto higher2nd = [unary](nullary_t f1){
+        return [unary, f1](unary_t f2){ return f2(unary(f1())); };
+      };
+      return higher1st(nullary) + higher2nd(nullary)(unary);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_variadic_templates
+  {
+
+    template <int...>
+    struct sum;
+
+    template <int N0, int... N1toN>
+    struct sum<N0, N1toN...>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = N0 + sum<N1toN...>::value;
+    };
+
+    template <>
+    struct sum<>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = 0;
+    };
+
+    static_assert(sum<>::value == 0, "");
+    static_assert(sum<1>::value == 1, "");
+    static_assert(sum<23>::value == 23, "");
+    static_assert(sum<1, 2>::value == 3, "");
+    static_assert(sum<5, 5, 11>::value == 21, "");
+    static_assert(sum<2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13>::value == 41, "");
+
+  }
+
+  // http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13728184/template-aliases-and-sfinae
+  // Clang 3.1 fails with headers of libstd++ 4.8.3 when using std::function
+  // because of this.
+  namespace test_template_alias_sfinae
+  {
+
+    struct foo {};
+
+    template<typename T>
+    using member = typename T::member_type;
+
+    template<typename T>
+    void func(...) {}
+
+    template<typename T>
+    void func(member<T>*) {}
+
+    void test();
+
+    void test() { func<foo>(0); }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx11
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201103L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx14
+{
+
+  namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
+        const auto istiny = [](auto x){
+          return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
+        };
+        const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
+        return aretiny[0];
+      };
+      return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_binary_literals
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
+    static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_generalized_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    constexpr unsigned long
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      auto length = 0UL;
+      for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
+        ++length;
+      return length;
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_init_capture
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
+      const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
+      return lambda2();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_digit_separators
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
+    static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_return_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    auto f(int& x) { return x; }
+    decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = true;
+    };
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
+      return x;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx14
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
+{
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
+  {
+
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
+  {
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
+  {
+
+    static_assert (true);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
+
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
+  }
+
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
+  {
+
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
+    {
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct base1
+    {
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
+    };
+
+    struct base2
+    {
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
+    };
+
+    struct derived : base1, base2
+    {
+        int d;
+    };
+
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
+  {
+
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
+
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
+
+    struct sentinel
+    {
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
+    }
+
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return !(i == s);
+    }
+
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
+  {
+
+    struct t
+    {
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
+  {
+
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
+    {
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
+  {
+
+    int f()
+    {
+      return 13;
+    }
+
+    int f2()
+    {
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
+  {
+
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
+    {
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
+
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
+  {
+
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
+
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
+  {
+
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
+    {
+      return arr;
+    }
+
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
+    {
+      return pr;
+    }
+
+    struct S
+    {
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
+    };
+
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
+    }
+
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
+  {
+
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
+
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
+
+    template<typename T>
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
+
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
+
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_inline_variables
+  {
+
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
+
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
+
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
+
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx17
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+
+
 _ACEOF
 if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"; then :
-  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11=yes
+  eval $cachevar=yes
 else
-  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11=no
+  eval $cachevar=no
 fi
 rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
+         CXX="$ac_save_CXX"
 fi
-{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11" >&5
-$as_echo "$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11" >&6; }
-    if test x$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11 = xyes; then
-      ac_success=yes
-    fi
+eval ac_res=\$$cachevar
+	       { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ac_res" >&5
+$as_echo "$ac_res" >&6; }
+      if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then
+        CXX_DIALECT="$switch"
+        CXX="$CXX $switch"
+        if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then
+          CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch"
+        fi
+        ac_success=yes
+        break
+      fi
+    done
+  fi
 
     if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
-      switch="-std=gnu++${alternative}"
-      cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
-      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch... " >&6; }
+                    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
+      for switch in -std=c++${alternative} +std=c++${alternative} "-h std=c++${alternative}" MSVC; do
+        if test x"$switch" = xMSVC; then
+                                        switch=-std:c++${alternative}
+          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17_${switch}_MSVC" | $as_tr_sh`
+        else
+          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
+        fi
+        { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch... " >&6; }
 if eval \${$cachevar+:} false; then :
   $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
 else
   ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
-         CXX="$CXX $switch"
-         cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
+           CXX="$CXX $switch"
+           cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
 /* end confdefs.h.  */
 
 
@@ -5637,337 +6967,501 @@  namespace cxx11
 
 
 
-_ACEOF
-if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"; then :
-  eval $cachevar=yes
-else
-  eval $cachevar=no
-fi
-rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
-         CXX="$ac_save_CXX"
-fi
-eval ac_res=\$$cachevar
-	       { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ac_res" >&5
-$as_echo "$ac_res" >&6; }
-      if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then
-        CXX_DIALECT="$switch"
-        CXX="$CXX $switch"
-        if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then
-          CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch"
-        fi
-        ac_success=yes
-        break
-      fi
-    done
-  fi
 
-    if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-                    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
-      for switch in -std=c++${alternative} +std=c++${alternative} "-h std=c++${alternative}" MSVC; do
-        if test x"$switch" = xMSVC; then
-                                        switch=-std:c++${alternative}
-          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11_${switch}_MSVC" | $as_tr_sh`
-        else
-          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
-        fi
-        { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch... " >&6; }
-if eval \${$cachevar+:} false; then :
-  $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
-else
-  ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
-           CXX="$CXX $switch"
-           cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
-/* end confdefs.h.  */
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx14
+{
+
+  namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
+        const auto istiny = [](auto x){
+          return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
+        };
+        const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
+        return aretiny[0];
+      };
+      return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_binary_literals
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
+    static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_generalized_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    constexpr unsigned long
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      auto length = 0UL;
+      for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
+        ++length;
+      return length;
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_init_capture
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
+      const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
+      return lambda2();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_digit_separators
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
+    static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_return_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    auto f(int& x) { return x; }
+    decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = true;
+    };
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
+      return x;
+    }
+
+  }
 
+}  // namespace cxx14
 
-// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++11, why torture it?
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
 // Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
 
 #ifndef __cplusplus
 
 #error "This is not a C++ compiler"
 
-// MSVC always sets __cplusplus to 199711L in older versions; newer versions
-// only set it correctly if /Zc:__cplusplus is specified as well as a
-// /std:c++NN switch:
-// https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/
-#elif __cplusplus < 201103L && !defined _MSC_VER
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
 
-#error "This is not a C++11 compiler"
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
 
 #else
 
-namespace cxx11
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
 {
 
-  namespace test_static_assert
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
   {
 
-    template <typename T>
-    struct check
-    {
-      static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough");
-    };
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_final_override
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
   {
 
-    struct Base
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
     {
-      virtual ~Base() {}
-      virtual void f() {}
-    };
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
 
-    struct Derived : public Base
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
     {
-      virtual ~Derived() override {}
-      virtual void f() override {}
-    };
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_double_right_angle_brackets
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
   {
 
-    template < typename T >
-    struct check {};
+    static_assert (true);
 
-    typedef check<void> single_type;
-    typedef check<check<void>> double_type;
-    typedef check<check<check<void>>> triple_type;
-    typedef check<check<check<check<void>>>> quadruple_type;
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
 
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
   }
 
-  namespace test_decltype
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
   {
 
-    int
-    f()
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
     {
-      int a = 1;
-      decltype(a) b = 2;
-      return a + b;
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
     }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_type_deduction
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
   {
 
-    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
-    struct is_same
+    struct base1
     {
-      static const bool value = false;
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
     };
 
-    template < typename T >
-    struct is_same<T, T>
+    struct base2
     {
-      static const bool value = true;
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
     };
 
-    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
-    auto
-    add(T1 a1, T2 a2) -> decltype(a1 + a2)
+    struct derived : base1, base2
     {
-      return a1 + a2;
+        int d;
+    };
+
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
+  {
+
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
+
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
+
+    struct sentinel
+    {
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
     }
 
-    int
-    test(const int c, volatile int v)
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
     {
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(0)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(c)>::value == false, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(v)>::value == false, "");
-      auto ac = c;
-      auto av = v;
-      auto sumi = ac + av + 'x';
-      auto sumf = ac + av + 1.0;
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(ac)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(av)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumi)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumf)>::value == false, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(add(c, v))>::value == true, "");
-      return (sumf > 0.0) ? sumi : add(c, v);
+      return !(i == s);
+    }
+
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
     }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_noexcept
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
   {
 
-    int f() { return 0; }
-    int g() noexcept { return 0; }
+    struct t
+    {
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
+    };
 
-    static_assert(noexcept(f()) == false, "");
-    static_assert(noexcept(g()) == true, "");
+  }
+
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_constexpr
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
   {
 
-    template < typename CharT >
-    unsigned long constexpr
-    strlen_c_r(const CharT *const s, const unsigned long acc) noexcept
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
     {
-      return *s ? strlen_c_r(s + 1, acc + 1) : acc;
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
     }
 
-    template < typename CharT >
-    unsigned long constexpr
-    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+  }
+
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
+  {
+
+    int f()
     {
-      return strlen_c_r(s, 0UL);
+      return 13;
     }
 
-    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("1") == 1UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("example") == 7UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0example") == 7UL, "");
+    int f2()
+    {
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
+    }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_rvalue_references
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
   {
 
-    template < int N >
-    struct answer
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
     {
-      static constexpr int value = N;
-    };
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
 
-    answer<1> f(int&)       { return answer<1>(); }
-    answer<2> f(const int&) { return answer<2>(); }
-    answer<3> f(int&&)      { return answer<3>(); }
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
 
-    void
-    test()
+    void f()
     {
-      int i = 0;
-      const int c = 0;
-      static_assert(decltype(f(i))::value == 1, "");
-      static_assert(decltype(f(c))::value == 2, "");
-      static_assert(decltype(f(0))::value == 3, "");
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
     }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_uniform_initialization
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
   {
 
-    struct test
-    {
-      static const int zero {};
-      static const int one {1};
-    };
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
 
-    static_assert(test::zero == 0, "");
-    static_assert(test::one == 1, "");
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_lambdas
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
   {
 
-    void
-    test1()
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
     {
-      auto lambda1 = [](){};
-      auto lambda2 = lambda1;
-      lambda1();
-      lambda2();
+      return arr;
     }
 
-    int
-    test2()
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
     {
-      auto a = [](int i, int j){ return i + j; }(1, 2);
-      auto b = []() -> int { return '0'; }();
-      auto c = [=](){ return a + b; }();
-      auto d = [&](){ return c; }();
-      auto e = [a, &b](int x) mutable {
-        const auto identity = [](int y){ return y; };
-        for (auto i = 0; i < a; ++i)
-          a += b--;
-        return x + identity(a + b);
-      }(0);
-      return a + b + c + d + e;
+      return pr;
     }
 
-    int
-    test3()
+    struct S
     {
-      const auto nullary = [](){ return 0; };
-      const auto unary = [](int x){ return x; };
-      using nullary_t = decltype(nullary);
-      using unary_t = decltype(unary);
-      const auto higher1st = [](nullary_t f){ return f(); };
-      const auto higher2nd = [unary](nullary_t f1){
-        return [unary, f1](unary_t f2){ return f2(unary(f1())); };
-      };
-      return higher1st(nullary) + higher2nd(nullary)(unary);
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
+    };
+
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
     }
 
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
+
   }
 
-  namespace test_variadic_templates
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
   {
 
-    template <int...>
-    struct sum;
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
 
-    template <int N0, int... N1toN>
-    struct sum<N0, N1toN...>
-    {
-      static constexpr auto value = N0 + sum<N1toN...>::value;
-    };
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
 
-    template <>
-    struct sum<>
-    {
-      static constexpr auto value = 0;
-    };
+    template<typename T>
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
 
-    static_assert(sum<>::value == 0, "");
-    static_assert(sum<1>::value == 1, "");
-    static_assert(sum<23>::value == 23, "");
-    static_assert(sum<1, 2>::value == 3, "");
-    static_assert(sum<5, 5, 11>::value == 21, "");
-    static_assert(sum<2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13>::value == 41, "");
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
+
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
 
   }
 
-  // http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13728184/template-aliases-and-sfinae
-  // Clang 3.1 fails with headers of libstd++ 4.8.3 when using std::function
-  // because of this.
-  namespace test_template_alias_sfinae
+  namespace test_inline_variables
   {
 
-    struct foo {};
-
-    template<typename T>
-    using member = typename T::member_type;
-
-    template<typename T>
-    void func(...) {}
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
 
-    template<typename T>
-    void func(member<T>*) {}
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
 
-    void test();
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
 
-    void test() { func<foo>(0); }
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
 
   }
 
-}  // namespace cxx11
+}  // namespace cxx17
 
-#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201103L
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
 
 
 
@@ -6004,19 +7498,19 @@  ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
 ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5'
 ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu
 
-  if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx11_required = xtrue; then
+  if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx17_required = xtrue; then
     if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-      as_fn_error $? "*** A compiler with support for C++11 language features is required." "$LINENO" 5
+      as_fn_error $? "*** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required." "$LINENO" 5
     fi
   fi
   if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-    HAVE_CXX11=0
-    { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: No compiler with C++11 support was found" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: No compiler with C++11 support was found" >&6;}
+    HAVE_CXX17=0
+    { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: No compiler with C++17 support was found" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: No compiler with C++17 support was found" >&6;}
   else
-    HAVE_CXX11=1
+    HAVE_CXX17=1
 
-$as_echo "#define HAVE_CXX11 1" >>confdefs.h
+$as_echo "#define HAVE_CXX17 1" >>confdefs.h
 
   fi
 
diff --git a/gdbserver/configure.ac b/gdbserver/configure.ac
index 12bc0090d67..2609a11e6f6 100644
--- a/gdbserver/configure.ac
+++ b/gdbserver/configure.ac
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@  AC_PROG_RANLIB
 
 AC_ARG_PROGRAM
 
-# We require a C++11 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
+# We require a C++17 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
 # necessary, set CXX_DIALECT to some -std=xxx switch.
-AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(11, , mandatory)
+AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(17, , mandatory)
 
 AC_HEADER_STDC
 
diff --git a/gdbsupport/Makefile.in b/gdbsupport/Makefile.in
index 07cb78fc4c7..50a5a55e19d 100644
--- a/gdbsupport/Makefile.in
+++ b/gdbsupport/Makefile.in
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@  EXEEXT = @EXEEXT@
 GENCAT = @GENCAT@
 GMSGFMT = @GMSGFMT@
 GREP = @GREP@
-HAVE_CXX11 = @HAVE_CXX11@
+HAVE_CXX17 = @HAVE_CXX17@
 HAVE_LIBIPT = @HAVE_LIBIPT@
 HAVE_LIBXXHASH = @HAVE_LIBXXHASH@
 INCINTL = @INCINTL@
diff --git a/gdbsupport/config.in b/gdbsupport/config.in
index 2cdc1fbde61..1cef12634bd 100644
--- a/gdbsupport/config.in
+++ b/gdbsupport/config.in
@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ 
    */
 #undef HAVE_ALLOCA_H
 
-/* define if the compiler supports basic C++11 syntax */
-#undef HAVE_CXX11
+/* define if the compiler supports basic C++17 syntax */
+#undef HAVE_CXX17
 
 /* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE', and to 0 if
    you don't. */
diff --git a/gdbsupport/configure b/gdbsupport/configure
index 6d2a4309d7e..0ef3d25a10b 100755
--- a/gdbsupport/configure
+++ b/gdbsupport/configure
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@  LIBINTL_DEP
 LIBINTL
 USE_NLS
 CXX_DIALECT
-HAVE_CXX11
+HAVE_CXX17
 LARGEFILE_CPPFLAGS
 EGREP
 GREP
@@ -5905,10 +5905,10 @@  fi
 
 
 
-# We require a C++11 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
+# We require a C++17 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
 # necessary, set CXX_DIALECT to some -std=xxx switch.
 
-  ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="11 0x"    ax_cxx_compile_cxx11_required=true
+  ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="17 1z"    ax_cxx_compile_cxx17_required=true
   ac_ext=cpp
 ac_cpp='$CXXCPP $CPPFLAGS'
 ac_compile='$CXX -c $CXXFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
@@ -5917,9 +5917,9 @@  ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_cxx_compiler_gnu
   CXX_DIALECT=""
   ac_success=no
 
-      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features by default" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features by default... " >&6; }
-if ${ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11+:} false; then :
+      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features by default" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features by default... " >&6; }
+if ${ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17+:} false; then :
   $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
 else
   cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
@@ -6216,32 +6216,1362 @@  namespace cxx11
 
 
 
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx14
+{
+
+  namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
+        const auto istiny = [](auto x){
+          return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
+        };
+        const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
+        return aretiny[0];
+      };
+      return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_binary_literals
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
+    static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_generalized_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    constexpr unsigned long
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      auto length = 0UL;
+      for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
+        ++length;
+      return length;
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_init_capture
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
+      const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
+      return lambda2();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_digit_separators
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
+    static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_return_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    auto f(int& x) { return x; }
+    decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = true;
+    };
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
+      return x;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx14
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
+{
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
+  {
+
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
+  {
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
+  {
+
+    static_assert (true);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
+
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
+  }
+
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
+  {
+
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
+    {
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct base1
+    {
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
+    };
+
+    struct base2
+    {
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
+    };
+
+    struct derived : base1, base2
+    {
+        int d;
+    };
+
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
+  {
+
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
+
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
+
+    struct sentinel
+    {
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
+    }
+
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return !(i == s);
+    }
+
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
+  {
+
+    struct t
+    {
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
+  {
+
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
+    {
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
+  {
+
+    int f()
+    {
+      return 13;
+    }
+
+    int f2()
+    {
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
+  {
+
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
+    {
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
+
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
+  {
+
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
+
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
+  {
+
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
+    {
+      return arr;
+    }
+
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
+    {
+      return pr;
+    }
+
+    struct S
+    {
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
+    };
+
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
+    }
+
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
+  {
+
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
+
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
+
+    template<typename T>
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
+
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
+
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_inline_variables
+  {
+
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
+
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
+
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
+
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx17
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+
+
+_ACEOF
+if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"; then :
+  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17=yes
+else
+  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17=no
+fi
+rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
+fi
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17" >&5
+$as_echo "$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17" >&6; }
+    if test x$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17 = xyes; then
+      ac_success=yes
+    fi
+
+    if test x$ac_success = xno; then
+    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
+      switch="-std=gnu++${alternative}"
+      cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
+      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch... " >&6; }
+if eval \${$cachevar+:} false; then :
+  $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
+else
+  ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
+         CXX="$CXX $switch"
+         cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
+/* end confdefs.h.  */
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++11, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+// MSVC always sets __cplusplus to 199711L in older versions; newer versions
+// only set it correctly if /Zc:__cplusplus is specified as well as a
+// /std:c++NN switch:
+// https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/
+#elif __cplusplus < 201103L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++11 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx11
+{
+
+  namespace test_static_assert
+  {
+
+    template <typename T>
+    struct check
+    {
+      static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough");
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_final_override
+  {
+
+    struct Base
+    {
+      virtual ~Base() {}
+      virtual void f() {}
+    };
+
+    struct Derived : public Base
+    {
+      virtual ~Derived() override {}
+      virtual void f() override {}
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_double_right_angle_brackets
+  {
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct check {};
+
+    typedef check<void> single_type;
+    typedef check<check<void>> double_type;
+    typedef check<check<check<void>>> triple_type;
+    typedef check<check<check<check<void>>>> quadruple_type;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_decltype
+  {
+
+    int
+    f()
+    {
+      int a = 1;
+      decltype(a) b = 2;
+      return a + b;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static const bool value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static const bool value = true;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    auto
+    add(T1 a1, T2 a2) -> decltype(a1 + a2)
+    {
+      return a1 + a2;
+    }
+
+    int
+    test(const int c, volatile int v)
+    {
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(0)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(c)>::value == false, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(v)>::value == false, "");
+      auto ac = c;
+      auto av = v;
+      auto sumi = ac + av + 'x';
+      auto sumf = ac + av + 1.0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(ac)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(av)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumi)>::value == true, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumf)>::value == false, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(add(c, v))>::value == true, "");
+      return (sumf > 0.0) ? sumi : add(c, v);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_noexcept
+  {
+
+    int f() { return 0; }
+    int g() noexcept { return 0; }
+
+    static_assert(noexcept(f()) == false, "");
+    static_assert(noexcept(g()) == true, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    unsigned long constexpr
+    strlen_c_r(const CharT *const s, const unsigned long acc) noexcept
+    {
+      return *s ? strlen_c_r(s + 1, acc + 1) : acc;
+    }
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    unsigned long constexpr
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      return strlen_c_r(s, 0UL);
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("1") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("example") == 7UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0example") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_rvalue_references
+  {
+
+    template < int N >
+    struct answer
+    {
+      static constexpr int value = N;
+    };
+
+    answer<1> f(int&)       { return answer<1>(); }
+    answer<2> f(const int&) { return answer<2>(); }
+    answer<3> f(int&&)      { return answer<3>(); }
+
+    void
+    test()
+    {
+      int i = 0;
+      const int c = 0;
+      static_assert(decltype(f(i))::value == 1, "");
+      static_assert(decltype(f(c))::value == 2, "");
+      static_assert(decltype(f(0))::value == 3, "");
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_uniform_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct test
+    {
+      static const int zero {};
+      static const int one {1};
+    };
+
+    static_assert(test::zero == 0, "");
+    static_assert(test::one == 1, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambdas
+  {
+
+    void
+    test1()
+    {
+      auto lambda1 = [](){};
+      auto lambda2 = lambda1;
+      lambda1();
+      lambda2();
+    }
+
+    int
+    test2()
+    {
+      auto a = [](int i, int j){ return i + j; }(1, 2);
+      auto b = []() -> int { return '0'; }();
+      auto c = [=](){ return a + b; }();
+      auto d = [&](){ return c; }();
+      auto e = [a, &b](int x) mutable {
+        const auto identity = [](int y){ return y; };
+        for (auto i = 0; i < a; ++i)
+          a += b--;
+        return x + identity(a + b);
+      }(0);
+      return a + b + c + d + e;
+    }
+
+    int
+    test3()
+    {
+      const auto nullary = [](){ return 0; };
+      const auto unary = [](int x){ return x; };
+      using nullary_t = decltype(nullary);
+      using unary_t = decltype(unary);
+      const auto higher1st = [](nullary_t f){ return f(); };
+      const auto higher2nd = [unary](nullary_t f1){
+        return [unary, f1](unary_t f2){ return f2(unary(f1())); };
+      };
+      return higher1st(nullary) + higher2nd(nullary)(unary);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_variadic_templates
+  {
+
+    template <int...>
+    struct sum;
+
+    template <int N0, int... N1toN>
+    struct sum<N0, N1toN...>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = N0 + sum<N1toN...>::value;
+    };
+
+    template <>
+    struct sum<>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = 0;
+    };
+
+    static_assert(sum<>::value == 0, "");
+    static_assert(sum<1>::value == 1, "");
+    static_assert(sum<23>::value == 23, "");
+    static_assert(sum<1, 2>::value == 3, "");
+    static_assert(sum<5, 5, 11>::value == 21, "");
+    static_assert(sum<2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13>::value == 41, "");
+
+  }
+
+  // http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13728184/template-aliases-and-sfinae
+  // Clang 3.1 fails with headers of libstd++ 4.8.3 when using std::function
+  // because of this.
+  namespace test_template_alias_sfinae
+  {
+
+    struct foo {};
+
+    template<typename T>
+    using member = typename T::member_type;
+
+    template<typename T>
+    void func(...) {}
+
+    template<typename T>
+    void func(member<T>*) {}
+
+    void test();
+
+    void test() { func<foo>(0); }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx11
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201103L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx14
+{
+
+  namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
+        const auto istiny = [](auto x){
+          return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
+        };
+        const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
+        return aretiny[0];
+      };
+      return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_binary_literals
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
+    static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_generalized_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    constexpr unsigned long
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      auto length = 0UL;
+      for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
+        ++length;
+      return length;
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_init_capture
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
+      const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
+      return lambda2();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_digit_separators
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
+    static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_return_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    auto f(int& x) { return x; }
+    decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = true;
+    };
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
+      return x;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx14
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
+{
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
+  {
+
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
+  {
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
+    {
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
+  {
+
+    static_assert (true);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
+
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
+  }
+
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
+  {
+
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
+    {
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
+  {
+
+    struct base1
+    {
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
+    };
+
+    struct base2
+    {
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
+    };
+
+    struct derived : base1, base2
+    {
+        int d;
+    };
+
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
+  {
+
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
+
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
+
+    struct sentinel
+    {
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
+    }
+
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return !(i == s);
+    }
+
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
+  {
+
+    struct t
+    {
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
+    };
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
+  {
+
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
+    {
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
+  {
+
+    int f()
+    {
+      return 13;
+    }
+
+    int f2()
+    {
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
+  {
+
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
+    {
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
+
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
+  {
+
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
+
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
+  {
+
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
+    {
+      return arr;
+    }
+
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
+    {
+      return pr;
+    }
+
+    struct S
+    {
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
+    };
+
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
+    }
+
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
+  {
+
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
+
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
+
+    template<typename T>
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
+
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
+
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_inline_variables
+  {
+
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
+
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
+
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
+
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
+
+  }
+
+}  // namespace cxx17
+
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+
+
 _ACEOF
 if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"; then :
-  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11=yes
+  eval $cachevar=yes
 else
-  ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11=no
+  eval $cachevar=no
 fi
 rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
+         CXX="$ac_save_CXX"
 fi
-{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11" >&5
-$as_echo "$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11" >&6; }
-    if test x$ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11 = xyes; then
-      ac_success=yes
-    fi
+eval ac_res=\$$cachevar
+	       { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ac_res" >&5
+$as_echo "$ac_res" >&6; }
+      if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then
+        CXX_DIALECT="$switch"
+        CXX="$CXX $switch"
+        if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then
+          CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch"
+        fi
+        ac_success=yes
+        break
+      fi
+    done
+  fi
 
     if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
-      switch="-std=gnu++${alternative}"
-      cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
-      { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch... " >&6; }
+                    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
+      for switch in -std=c++${alternative} +std=c++${alternative} "-h std=c++${alternative}" MSVC; do
+        if test x"$switch" = xMSVC; then
+                                        switch=-std:c++${alternative}
+          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17_${switch}_MSVC" | $as_tr_sh`
+        else
+          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx17_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
+        fi
+        { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++17 features with $switch... " >&6; }
 if eval \${$cachevar+:} false; then :
   $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
 else
   ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
-         CXX="$CXX $switch"
-         cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
+           CXX="$CXX $switch"
+           cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
 /* end confdefs.h.  */
 
 
@@ -6535,337 +7865,501 @@  namespace cxx11
 
 
 
-_ACEOF
-if ac_fn_cxx_try_compile "$LINENO"; then :
-  eval $cachevar=yes
-else
-  eval $cachevar=no
-fi
-rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
-         CXX="$ac_save_CXX"
-fi
-eval ac_res=\$$cachevar
-	       { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ac_res" >&5
-$as_echo "$ac_res" >&6; }
-      if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then
-        CXX_DIALECT="$switch"
-        CXX="$CXX $switch"
-        if test -n "$CXXCPP" ; then
-          CXXCPP="$CXXCPP $switch"
-        fi
-        ac_success=yes
-        break
-      fi
-    done
-  fi
 
-    if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-                    for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
-      for switch in -std=c++${alternative} +std=c++${alternative} "-h std=c++${alternative}" MSVC; do
-        if test x"$switch" = xMSVC; then
-                                        switch=-std:c++${alternative}
-          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11_${switch}_MSVC" | $as_tr_sh`
-        else
-          cachevar=`$as_echo "ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx11_$switch" | $as_tr_sh`
-        fi
-        { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking whether $CXX supports C++11 features with $switch... " >&6; }
-if eval \${$cachevar+:} false; then :
-  $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
-else
-  ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
-           CXX="$CXX $switch"
-           cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
-/* end confdefs.h.  */
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
+// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+
+#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
+
+#elif __cplusplus < 201402L && !defined _MSC_VER
+
+#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
+
+#else
+
+namespace cxx14
+{
+
+  namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
+        const auto istiny = [](auto x){
+          return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
+        };
+        const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
+        return aretiny[0];
+      };
+      return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_binary_literals
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
+    static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_generalized_constexpr
+  {
+
+    template < typename CharT >
+    constexpr unsigned long
+    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+    {
+      auto length = 0UL;
+      for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
+        ++length;
+      return length;
+    }
+
+    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
+    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_lambda_init_capture
+  {
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
+      const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
+      return lambda2();
+    }
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_digit_separators
+  {
+
+    constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
+    static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_return_type_deduction
+  {
+
+    auto f(int& x) { return x; }
+    decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
+
+    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
+    struct is_same
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = false;
+    };
+
+    template < typename T >
+    struct is_same<T, T>
+    {
+      static constexpr auto value = true;
+    };
+
+    int
+    test()
+    {
+      auto x = 0;
+      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
+      static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
+      return x;
+    }
+
+  }
 
+}  // namespace cxx14
 
-// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++11, why torture it?
+#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201402L
+
+
+
+
+// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
 // Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
 
 #ifndef __cplusplus
 
 #error "This is not a C++ compiler"
 
-// MSVC always sets __cplusplus to 199711L in older versions; newer versions
-// only set it correctly if /Zc:__cplusplus is specified as well as a
-// /std:c++NN switch:
-// https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/
-#elif __cplusplus < 201103L && !defined _MSC_VER
+#elif __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
 
-#error "This is not a C++11 compiler"
+#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
 
 #else
 
-namespace cxx11
+#include <initializer_list>
+#include <utility>
+#include <type_traits>
+
+namespace cxx17
 {
 
-  namespace test_static_assert
+  namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
   {
 
-    template <typename T>
-    struct check
-    {
-      static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough");
-    };
+    constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_final_override
+  namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
   {
 
-    struct Base
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fold_expression
+  {
+
+    template<typename... Args>
+    int multiply(Args... args)
     {
-      virtual ~Base() {}
-      virtual void f() {}
-    };
+      return (args * ... * 1);
+    }
 
-    struct Derived : public Base
+    template<typename... Args>
+    bool all(Args... args)
     {
-      virtual ~Derived() override {}
-      virtual void f() override {}
-    };
+      return (args && ...);
+    }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_double_right_angle_brackets
+  namespace test_extended_static_assert
   {
 
-    template < typename T >
-    struct check {};
+    static_assert (true);
 
-    typedef check<void> single_type;
-    typedef check<check<void>> double_type;
-    typedef check<check<check<void>>> triple_type;
-    typedef check<check<check<check<void>>>> quadruple_type;
+  }
+
+  namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
+  {
 
+    auto foo = {5};
+    auto bar {5};
+
+    static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
+    static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
   }
 
-  namespace test_decltype
+  namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
   {
 
-    int
-    f()
+    template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
+  {
+
+    int f1()
     {
-      int a = 1;
-      decltype(a) b = 2;
-      return a + b;
+      return 42;
+    }
+
+    [[nodiscard]] int f2()
+    {
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
+
+      switch (f1())
+      {
+      case 17:
+        f1();
+        [[fallthrough]];
+      case 42:
+        f1();
+      }
+      return f1();
     }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_type_deduction
+  namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
   {
 
-    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
-    struct is_same
+    struct base1
     {
-      static const bool value = false;
+      int b1, b2 = 42;
     };
 
-    template < typename T >
-    struct is_same<T, T>
+    struct base2
     {
-      static const bool value = true;
+      base2() {
+        b3 = 42;
+      }
+      int b3;
     };
 
-    template < typename T1, typename T2 >
-    auto
-    add(T1 a1, T2 a2) -> decltype(a1 + a2)
+    struct derived : base1, base2
     {
-      return a1 + a2;
+        int d;
+    };
+
+    derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4};  // full initialization
+    derived d2 {{}, {}, 4};      // value-initialized bases
+
+  }
+
+  namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
+  {
+
+    struct iter
+    {
+      int i;
+
+      int& operator* ()
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      const int& operator* () const
+      {
+        return i;
+      }
+
+      iter& operator++()
+      {
+        ++i;
+        return *this;
+      }
+    };
+
+    struct sentinel
+    {
+      int i;
+    };
+
+    bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
+    {
+      return i.i == s.i;
     }
 
-    int
-    test(const int c, volatile int v)
+    bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
     {
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(0)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(c)>::value == false, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(v)>::value == false, "");
-      auto ac = c;
-      auto av = v;
-      auto sumi = ac + av + 'x';
-      auto sumf = ac + av + 1.0;
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(ac)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(av)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumi)>::value == true, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumf)>::value == false, "");
-      static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(add(c, v))>::value == true, "");
-      return (sumf > 0.0) ? sumi : add(c, v);
+      return !(i == s);
+    }
+
+    struct range
+    {
+      iter begin() const
+      {
+        return {0};
+      }
+
+      sentinel end() const
+      {
+        return {5};
+      }
+    };
+
+    void f()
+    {
+      range r {};
+
+      for (auto i : r)
+      {
+        [[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
+      }
     }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_noexcept
+  namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
   {
 
-    int f() { return 0; }
-    int g() noexcept { return 0; }
+    struct t
+    {
+      int i;
+      int foo()
+      {
+        return [*this]()
+        {
+          return i;
+        }();
+      }
+    };
 
-    static_assert(noexcept(f()) == false, "");
-    static_assert(noexcept(g()) == true, "");
+  }
+
+  namespace test_enum_class_construction
+  {
+
+    enum class byte : unsigned char
+    {};
+
+    byte foo {42};
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_constexpr
+  namespace test_constexpr_if
   {
 
-    template < typename CharT >
-    unsigned long constexpr
-    strlen_c_r(const CharT *const s, const unsigned long acc) noexcept
+    template <bool cond>
+    int f ()
     {
-      return *s ? strlen_c_r(s + 1, acc + 1) : acc;
+      if constexpr(cond)
+      {
+        return 13;
+      }
+      else
+      {
+        return 42;
+      }
     }
 
-    template < typename CharT >
-    unsigned long constexpr
-    strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
+  }
+
+  namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
+  {
+
+    int f()
     {
-      return strlen_c_r(s, 0UL);
+      return 13;
     }
 
-    static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("1") == 1UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("example") == 7UL, "");
-    static_assert(strlen_c("another\0example") == 7UL, "");
+    int f2()
+    {
+      if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
+      {
+        return 3;
+      }
+
+      switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
+      {
+      case 17:
+        return 2;
+
+      default:
+        return 1;
+      }
+    }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_rvalue_references
+  namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
   {
 
-    template < int N >
-    struct answer
+    template <typename T1, typename T2>
+    struct pair
     {
-      static constexpr int value = N;
-    };
+      pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
+        : m1 {p1},
+          m2 {p2}
+      {}
 
-    answer<1> f(int&)       { return answer<1>(); }
-    answer<2> f(const int&) { return answer<2>(); }
-    answer<3> f(int&&)      { return answer<3>(); }
+      T1 m1;
+      T2 m2;
+    };
 
-    void
-    test()
+    void f()
     {
-      int i = 0;
-      const int c = 0;
-      static_assert(decltype(f(i))::value == 1, "");
-      static_assert(decltype(f(c))::value == 2, "");
-      static_assert(decltype(f(0))::value == 3, "");
+      [[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
     }
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_uniform_initialization
+  namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
   {
 
-    struct test
-    {
-      static const int zero {};
-      static const int one {1};
-    };
+    template <auto n>
+    struct B
+    {};
 
-    static_assert(test::zero == 0, "");
-    static_assert(test::one == 1, "");
+    B<5> b1;
+    B<'a'> b2;
 
   }
 
-  namespace test_lambdas
+  namespace test_structured_bindings
   {
 
-    void
-    test1()
+    int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
+    std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
+
+    auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
     {
-      auto lambda1 = [](){};
-      auto lambda2 = lambda1;
-      lambda1();
-      lambda2();
+      return arr;
     }
 
-    int
-    test2()
+    auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
     {
-      auto a = [](int i, int j){ return i + j; }(1, 2);
-      auto b = []() -> int { return '0'; }();
-      auto c = [=](){ return a + b; }();
-      auto d = [&](){ return c; }();
-      auto e = [a, &b](int x) mutable {
-        const auto identity = [](int y){ return y; };
-        for (auto i = 0; i < a; ++i)
-          a += b--;
-        return x + identity(a + b);
-      }(0);
-      return a + b + c + d + e;
+      return pr;
     }
 
-    int
-    test3()
+    struct S
     {
-      const auto nullary = [](){ return 0; };
-      const auto unary = [](int x){ return x; };
-      using nullary_t = decltype(nullary);
-      using unary_t = decltype(unary);
-      const auto higher1st = [](nullary_t f){ return f(); };
-      const auto higher2nd = [unary](nullary_t f1){
-        return [unary, f1](unary_t f2){ return f2(unary(f1())); };
-      };
-      return higher1st(nullary) + higher2nd(nullary)(unary);
+      int x1 : 2;
+      volatile double y1;
+    };
+
+    S f3()
+    {
+      return {};
     }
 
+    auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
+    auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
+    auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
+    auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
+    const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
+
   }
 
-  namespace test_variadic_templates
+  namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
   {
 
-    template <int...>
-    struct sum;
+    struct Good {};
+    struct Bad {};
 
-    template <int N0, int... N1toN>
-    struct sum<N0, N1toN...>
-    {
-      static constexpr auto value = N0 + sum<N1toN...>::value;
-    };
+    void g1() noexcept;
+    void g2();
 
-    template <>
-    struct sum<>
-    {
-      static constexpr auto value = 0;
-    };
+    template<typename T>
+    Bad
+    f(T*, T*);
 
-    static_assert(sum<>::value == 0, "");
-    static_assert(sum<1>::value == 1, "");
-    static_assert(sum<23>::value == 23, "");
-    static_assert(sum<1, 2>::value == 3, "");
-    static_assert(sum<5, 5, 11>::value == 21, "");
-    static_assert(sum<2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13>::value == 41, "");
+    template<typename T1, typename T2>
+    Good
+    f(T1*, T2*);
+
+    static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
 
   }
 
-  // http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13728184/template-aliases-and-sfinae
-  // Clang 3.1 fails with headers of libstd++ 4.8.3 when using std::function
-  // because of this.
-  namespace test_template_alias_sfinae
+  namespace test_inline_variables
   {
 
-    struct foo {};
-
-    template<typename T>
-    using member = typename T::member_type;
-
-    template<typename T>
-    void func(...) {}
+    template<class T> void f(T)
+    {}
 
-    template<typename T>
-    void func(member<T>*) {}
+    template<class T> inline T g(T)
+    {
+      return T{};
+    }
 
-    void test();
+    template<> inline void f<>(int)
+    {}
 
-    void test() { func<foo>(0); }
+    template<> int g<>(int)
+    {
+      return 5;
+    }
 
   }
 
-}  // namespace cxx11
+}  // namespace cxx17
 
-#endif  // __cplusplus >= 201103L
+#endif  // __cplusplus < 201703L && !defined _MSC_VER
 
 
 
@@ -6902,19 +8396,19 @@  ac_compile='$CC -c $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext >&5'
 ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5'
 ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu
 
-  if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx11_required = xtrue; then
+  if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx17_required = xtrue; then
     if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-      as_fn_error $? "*** A compiler with support for C++11 language features is required." "$LINENO" 5
+      as_fn_error $? "*** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required." "$LINENO" 5
     fi
   fi
   if test x$ac_success = xno; then
-    HAVE_CXX11=0
-    { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: No compiler with C++11 support was found" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: No compiler with C++11 support was found" >&6;}
+    HAVE_CXX17=0
+    { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: No compiler with C++17 support was found" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: No compiler with C++17 support was found" >&6;}
   else
-    HAVE_CXX11=1
+    HAVE_CXX17=1
 
-$as_echo "#define HAVE_CXX11 1" >>confdefs.h
+$as_echo "#define HAVE_CXX17 1" >>confdefs.h
 
   fi
 
diff --git a/gdbsupport/configure.ac b/gdbsupport/configure.ac
index 2cb382bd4ec..a0986fab9cd 100644
--- a/gdbsupport/configure.ac
+++ b/gdbsupport/configure.ac
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@  AC_PROG_RANLIB
 AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS
 ACX_LARGEFILE
 
-# We require a C++11 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
+# We require a C++17 compiler.  Check if one is available, and if
 # necessary, set CXX_DIALECT to some -std=xxx switch.
-AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(11, , mandatory)
+AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(17, , mandatory)
 
 dnl Set up for gettext.
 ZW_GNU_GETTEXT_SISTER_DIR