[PATCHv2] xcoffread.c: Fix -Werror=dangling-pointer= issue with main_subfile.

Message ID 20230501181948.1407024-1-mark@klomp.org
State New
Headers
Series [PATCHv2] xcoffread.c: Fix -Werror=dangling-pointer= issue with main_subfile. |

Commit Message

Mark Wielaard May 1, 2023, 6:19 p.m. UTC
  GCC 13 points out that main_subfile has local function scope, but a
pointer to it is assigned to the global inclTable array subfile
element field:

In function ‘void process_linenos(CORE_ADDR, CORE_ADDR)’,
    inlined from ‘void aix_process_linenos(objfile*)’ at xcoffread.c:727:19,
    inlined from ‘void aix_process_linenos(objfile*)’ at xcoffread.c:720:1:
xcoffread.c:629:37: error: storing the address of local variable ‘main_subfile’ in ‘*inclTable.19_45 + _28._inclTable::subfile’ [-Werror=dangling-pointer=]
  629 |               inclTable[ii].subfile = &main_subfile;
      |               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
xcoffread.c: In function ‘void aix_process_linenos(objfile*)’:
xcoffread.c:579:18: note: ‘main_subfile’ declared here
  579 |   struct subfile main_subfile;
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~
xcoffread.c:496:19: note: ‘inclTable’ declared here
  496 | static InclTable *inclTable;    /* global include table */
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~

Fix this by making main_subfile file static. And allocate and
deallocated together with inclTable in allocate_include_entry and
xcoff_symfile_finish. Adjust the use of main_subfile in
process_linenos to take a pointer to the subfile.
---

v2: Removed struct. new subfile. Remove unnecessary cast.

 gdb/xcoffread.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Tom Tromey May 2, 2023, 3:12 p.m. UTC | #1
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:

Mark> GCC 13 points out that main_subfile has local function scope, but a
Mark> pointer to it is assigned to the global inclTable array subfile
Mark> element field:

Thanks, Mark.  This is ok.

All this code seems very bit-rotted to me.  Like, it seems to me that it
doesn't even properly handle multiple objfiles, a genuinely ancient
addition to gdb.  I wonder whether it could be removed.

Tom
  

Patch

diff --git a/gdb/xcoffread.c b/gdb/xcoffread.c
index d71127b40f6..e5b8e8a69fc 100644
--- a/gdb/xcoffread.c
+++ b/gdb/xcoffread.c
@@ -498,6 +498,9 @@  static int inclIndx;		/* last entry to table */
 static int inclLength;		/* table length */
 static int inclDepth;		/* nested include depth */
 
+/* subfile structure for the main compilation unit.  */
+static subfile *main_subfile;
+
 static void allocate_include_entry (void);
 
 static void
@@ -548,6 +551,7 @@  allocate_include_entry (void)
       inclTable = XCNEWVEC (InclTable, INITIAL_INCLUDE_TABLE_LENGTH);
       inclLength = INITIAL_INCLUDE_TABLE_LENGTH;
       inclIndx = 0;
+      main_subfile = new subfile;
     }
   else if (inclIndx >= inclLength)
     {
@@ -575,9 +579,6 @@  process_linenos (CORE_ADDR start, CORE_ADDR end)
   file_ptr max_offset
     = XCOFF_DATA (this_symtab_objfile)->max_lineno_offset;
 
-  /* subfile structure for the main compilation unit.  */
-  struct subfile main_subfile;
-
   /* In the main source file, any time we see a function entry, we
      reset this variable to function's absolute starting line number.
      All the following line numbers in the function are relative to
@@ -596,7 +597,7 @@  process_linenos (CORE_ADDR start, CORE_ADDR end)
     /* All source lines were in the main source file.  None in include
        files.  */
 
-    enter_line_range (&main_subfile, offset, 0, start, end,
+    enter_line_range (main_subfile, offset, 0, start, end,
 		      &main_source_baseline);
 
   else
@@ -613,7 +614,7 @@  process_linenos (CORE_ADDR start, CORE_ADDR end)
 	  if (offset < inclTable[ii].begin)
 	    {
 	      enter_line_range
-		(&main_subfile, offset, inclTable[ii].begin - linesz,
+		(main_subfile, offset, inclTable[ii].begin - linesz,
 		 start, 0, &main_source_baseline);
 	    }
 
@@ -624,9 +625,9 @@  process_linenos (CORE_ADDR start, CORE_ADDR end)
 
 	      main_source_baseline = inclTable[ii].funStartLine;
 	      enter_line_range
-		(&main_subfile, inclTable[ii].begin, inclTable[ii].end,
+		(main_subfile, inclTable[ii].begin, inclTable[ii].end,
 		 start, 0, &main_source_baseline);
-	      inclTable[ii].subfile = &main_subfile;
+	      inclTable[ii].subfile = main_subfile;
 	    }
 	  else
 	    {
@@ -648,24 +649,24 @@  process_linenos (CORE_ADDR start, CORE_ADDR end)
 	 enter remaining lines of the main file, if any left.  */
       if (offset < max_offset + 1 - linesz)
 	{
-	  enter_line_range (&main_subfile, offset, 0, start, end,
+	  enter_line_range (main_subfile, offset, 0, start, end,
 			    &main_source_baseline);
 	}
     }
 
   /* Process main file's line numbers.  */
-  if (!main_subfile.line_vector_entries.empty ())
+  if (!main_subfile->line_vector_entries.empty ())
     {
       /* Line numbers are not necessarily ordered.  xlc compilation will
 	 put static function to the end.  */
-      arrange_linetable (main_subfile.line_vector_entries);
+      arrange_linetable (main_subfile->line_vector_entries);
     }
 
   /* Now, process included files' line numbers.  */
 
   for (int ii = 0; ii < inclIndx; ++ii)
     {
-      if (inclTable[ii].subfile != ((struct subfile *) &main_subfile)
+      if (inclTable[ii].subfile != main_subfile
 	  && !inclTable[ii].subfile->line_vector_entries.empty ())
 	{
 	  /* Line numbers are not necessarily ordered.  xlc compilation will
@@ -1803,6 +1804,7 @@  xcoff_symfile_finish (struct objfile *objfile)
     {
       xfree (inclTable);
       inclTable = NULL;
+      delete main_subfile;
     }
   inclIndx = inclLength = inclDepth = 0;
 }