Message ID | 1413167088-14327-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 10/13/2014 03:24 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > The condition [target_info exists noargs] is checked when > remotetimeout.exp was added > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-02/msg00052.html > > noargs means GDB does not support argument passing for inferior, > rather than doesn't support argument passing to GDB (remotetimeout.exp > passes -l to GDB). Yeah, makes sense. > > This patch is to remove such unnecessary checking, and > remotetimeout.exp then can be run with native-gdbserver board file. > > gdb/testsuite: > > 2014-10-13 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> > > * gdb.base/remotetimeout.exp: Remove noargs checking. LGTM. Thanks, Pedro Alves
Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes: >> This patch is to remove such unnecessary checking, and >> remotetimeout.exp then can be run with native-gdbserver board file. >> >> gdb/testsuite: >> >> 2014-10-13 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> >> >> * gdb.base/remotetimeout.exp: Remove noargs checking. > > LGTM. Thanks, patch is pushed in.
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/remotetimeout.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/remotetimeout.exp index b19deec..c1f511c 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/remotetimeout.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/remotetimeout.exp @@ -21,11 +21,6 @@ global GDBFLAGS -# Skip test if target does not support argument passing. -if [target_info exists noargs] { - return -} - # # Test that -l is processed correctly. #