[6/9] gdb: remove unnecessary notification of executable_changed observer
Checks
Context |
Check |
Description |
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm |
success
|
Testing passed
|
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_build--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Testing passed
|
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_build--master-arm |
success
|
Testing passed
|
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Testing passed
|
Commit Message
This commit continues the work of the previous two commits.
My goal, in the next couple of commits, is to expose the
executable_changed observable in the Python API as an event. However,
before I do that I want to remove the use of the executable_changed
observable from the reread_symbols function in symfile.c as this use
isn't directly associated with a change of the executable file, and so
seems wrong.
In the previous two commits I have removed all users of the
executable_changed observer as I believe those users can, and should,
actually be listening for the new_objfile observable instead, so now
there are no users of the executable_changed observable.
As such, I think removing the use of executable_changed from the
function reread_symbols is perfectly safe, and correct. At this point
the executable has not been changed, so we shouldn't be sending an
executable_changed notification, and, as there is nobody listening to
this observable, we can't break anything by removing this call.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
---
gdb/symfile.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
@@ -2684,10 +2684,6 @@ reread_symbols (int from_tty)
clear_symtab_users above. Notify the new files now. */
for (auto iter : new_objfiles)
gdb::observers::new_objfile.notify (iter);
-
- /* At least one objfile has changed, so we can consider that
- the executable we're debugging has changed too. */
- gdb::observers::executable_changed.notify ();
}
}