testsuite: vect: update unaligned message

  gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c covers ppc variants
that accept and reject misaligned accesses.  The message that it
expects for rejection was removed in the gcc-11 development cycle by
commit r11-1969.  The patch adjusted multiple tests to use the message
introduced in r11-1945, but missed this one.

Regstrapped on powerpc64el-linux-gnu.  Ok to install?

Also tested on x86_64-linux-gnu-x-ppc64-vx7r2 with gcc-11.  Ok for
gcc-11?


for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

	* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c: Update
	the expected message for the case in which unaligned accesses
	are not allowed.
---
 .../gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> 
> gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c covers ppc variants
> that accept and reject misaligned accesses.  The message that it
> expects for rejection was removed in the gcc-11 development cycle by
> commit r11-1969.  The patch adjusted multiple tests to use the message
> introduced in r11-1945, but missed this one.
> 
> Regstrapped on powerpc64el-linux-gnu.  Ok to install?
> 
> Also tested on x86_64-linux-gnu-x-ppc64-vx7r2 with gcc-11.  Ok for
> gcc-11?

OK.

> 
> for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c: Update
> 	the expected message for the case in which unaligned accesses
> 	are not allowed.
> ---
>  .../gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c
> index 72b4930d9bbbe..c57f065cccdd6 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c
> @@ -46,5 +46,5 @@ int main (void)
>    return main1 ();
>  } 
>  
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "not vectorized: unsupported unaligned store" 1 "vect" { target { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "unsupported unaligned access" 1 "vect" { target { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 0 "vect" { target { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
> 
>
  

On Apr 28, 2022, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> 
>> gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c covers ppc variants
>> that accept and reject misaligned accesses.  The message that it
>> expects for rejection was removed in the gcc-11 development cycle by
>> commit r11-1969.  The patch adjusted multiple tests to use the message
>> introduced in r11-1945, but missed this one.
>> 
>> Regstrapped on powerpc64el-linux-gnu.  Ok to install?
>> 
>> Also tested on x86_64-linux-gnu-x-ppc64-vx7r2 with gcc-11.  Ok for
>> gcc-11?

> OK.

I checked it in the trunk so far, but I missed the gcc-12 branching.
This is surely not critical for gcc-12, but it's so trivial that I
wonder if I could install it in both gcc-12 and gcc-11 branches and
forget about it, or wait until 12.1 is final.  WDYT?

>> for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> 
>> * gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c: Update
>> the expected message for the case in which unaligned accesses
>> are not allowed.

>> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "not vectorized: unsupported unaligned store" 1 "vect" { target { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "unsupported unaligned access" 1 "vect" { target { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
  

On Mon, 2 May 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> On Apr 28, 2022, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> 
> >> gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c covers ppc variants
> >> that accept and reject misaligned accesses.  The message that it
> >> expects for rejection was removed in the gcc-11 development cycle by
> >> commit r11-1969.  The patch adjusted multiple tests to use the message
> >> introduced in r11-1945, but missed this one.
> >> 
> >> Regstrapped on powerpc64el-linux-gnu.  Ok to install?
> >> 
> >> Also tested on x86_64-linux-gnu-x-ppc64-vx7r2 with gcc-11.  Ok for
> >> gcc-11?
> 
> > OK.
> 
> I checked it in the trunk so far, but I missed the gcc-12 branching.
> This is surely not critical for gcc-12, but it's so trivial that I
> wonder if I could install it in both gcc-12 and gcc-11 branches and
> forget about it, or wait until 12.1 is final.  WDYT?

It's OK for the 12 branch now.

Richard.

> >> for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> >> 
> >> * gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c: Update
> >> the expected message for the case in which unaligned accesses
> >> are not allowed.
> 
> >> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "not vectorized: unsupported unaligned store" 1 "vect" { target { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
> >> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "unsupported unaligned access" 1 "vect" { target { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
> 
> 
>