Message ID | YuECqsVtvkrv0Btn@tucnak |
---|---|
State | Committed |
Headers |
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C643857022 for <patchwork@sourceware.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:18:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 96C643857022 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1658913485; bh=/ftrF7qldxlrltMD8Uhgb+OtTiYLBrvySY9UemoZoAk=; h=Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:From; b=dmoDxa6BiMcSBOViamgAzfEZOuVJp53Wcux39hU/sIB9GSK6SjZckJdYGIfWWPwZd YcliRN4EGpbHA9NFrj6gVv0UR+j6Kgre0Ml0CJT6CBdBbzLKbkq5HhIIYfV9fUZtLX vJw03fs8hUym2pfhoCbJ0co/7+evwfvQX7kFe5VQ= X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A6B23857374 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:17:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4A6B23857374 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-529-5a8sdW5iOT68T01OJoR8fw-1; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 05:17:34 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5a8sdW5iOT68T01OJoR8fw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619652813D30; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.41]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E00590A04; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 26R9HVPc2208137 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:17:31 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 26R9HUaC2208136; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:17:30 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:17:30 +0200 To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> Subject: [PATCH] opts: Add an assertion to help static analyzers [PR106332] Message-ID: <YuECqsVtvkrv0Btn@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> From: Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" <gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org> |
Series |
opts: Add an assertion to help static analyzers [PR106332]
|
|
Commit Message
Jakub Jelinek
July 27, 2022, 9:17 a.m. UTC
Hi! This function would have UB if called with empty candidates vector (accessing p[-1] where p is malloc (0) result). As analyzed in the PR, we never call it with empty vector, so this just adds an assertion to make it clear. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2022-07-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR middle-end/106332 * opts-common.cc (candidates_list_and_hint): Add gcc_checking_assert that candidates is not an empty vector. Jakub
Comments
On Wed, 27 Jul 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > This function would have UB if called with empty candidates vector > (accessing p[-1] where p is malloc (0) result). > As analyzed in the PR, we never call it with empty vector, so this just > adds an assertion to make it clear. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? OK, I think we can make this a gcc_assert even. Richard. > 2022-07-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> > > PR middle-end/106332 > * opts-common.cc (candidates_list_and_hint): Add gcc_checking_assert > that candidates is not an empty vector. > > --- gcc/opts-common.cc.jj 2022-02-04 14:36:55.439599237 +0100 > +++ gcc/opts-common.cc 2022-07-26 11:21:49.785919993 +0200 > @@ -1347,6 +1347,8 @@ candidates_list_and_hint (const char *ar > const char *candidate; > char *p; > > + gcc_checking_assert (!candidates.is_empty ()); > + > FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (candidates, i, candidate) > len += strlen (candidate) + 1; > > > Jakub > >
--- gcc/opts-common.cc.jj 2022-02-04 14:36:55.439599237 +0100 +++ gcc/opts-common.cc 2022-07-26 11:21:49.785919993 +0200 @@ -1347,6 +1347,8 @@ candidates_list_and_hint (const char *ar const char *candidate; char *p; + gcc_checking_assert (!candidates.is_empty ()); + FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (candidates, i, candidate) len += strlen (candidate) + 1;