c: Don't emit DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs for K&R function argument declarations [PR105972]

Message ID Y776K/eRDes5Z0MD@tucnak
State New
Headers
Series c: Don't emit DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs for K&R function argument declarations [PR105972] |

Commit Message

Jakub Jelinek Jan. 11, 2023, 6:04 p.m. UTC
  Hi!

K&R function parameter declarations are handled by calling
recursively c_parser_declaration_or_fndef in a loop, where each such
call will add_debug_begin_stmt at the start.
Now, if the K&R function definition is not a nested function,
building_stmt_list_p () is false and so we don't emit the DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs
anywhere, but if it is a nested function, we emit it in the containing
function at the point of the nested function definition.
As the following testcase shows, it can cause ICEs if the containing
function has var-tracking disabled but nested function has them enabled,
as the DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs are added to the containing function which
shouldn't have them but MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_MARKER_STMTS is checked already
for the nested function, or just wrong experience in the debugger.

The following patch ensures we don't emit any such DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs for the
K&R function parameter declarations even in nested functions.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2023-01-11  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR c/105972
	* c-parser.cc (c_parser_declaration_or_fndef): Disable debug non-bind
	markers for K&R function parameter declarations of nested functions.

	* gcc.dg/pr105972.c: New test.


	Jakub
  

Comments

Joseph Myers Jan. 11, 2023, 8:26 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:

> The following patch ensures we don't emit any such DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs for the
> K&R function parameter declarations even in nested functions.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
> 
> 2023-01-11  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR c/105972
> 	* c-parser.cc (c_parser_declaration_or_fndef): Disable debug non-bind
> 	markers for K&R function parameter declarations of nested functions.
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/pr105972.c: New test.

OK.
  

Patch

--- gcc/c/c-parser.cc.jj	2023-01-09 13:30:46.873347238 +0100
+++ gcc/c/c-parser.cc	2023-01-11 14:55:39.161287717 +0100
@@ -2804,10 +2804,13 @@  c_parser_declaration_or_fndef (c_parser
 	 declarator with a nonempty identifier list in a definition;
 	 and postfix attributes have never been accepted here in
 	 function definitions either.  */
+      int save_debug_nonbind_markers_p = debug_nonbind_markers_p;
+      debug_nonbind_markers_p = 0;
       while (c_parser_next_token_is_not (parser, CPP_EOF)
 	     && c_parser_next_token_is_not (parser, CPP_OPEN_BRACE))
 	c_parser_declaration_or_fndef (parser, false, false, false,
 				       true, false);
+      debug_nonbind_markers_p = save_debug_nonbind_markers_p;
       store_parm_decls ();
       if (omp_declare_simd_clauses)
 	c_finish_omp_declare_simd (parser, current_function_decl, NULL_TREE,
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr105972.c.jj	2023-01-11 15:06:55.377366557 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr105972.c	2023-01-11 15:04:47.817238069 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ 
+/* PR c/105972 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -g" } */
+
+__attribute__((optimize (0))) int
+foo (void)
+{
+  int
+  bar (x)
+    int x;
+  {
+    return x;
+  }
+  return bar (0);
+}