Message ID | Y5JrqSFa/3Z2D4AR@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | Committed |
Commit | 6a07798c6bc602c355a546057187169f79872696 |
Headers |
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B8B383D5DC for <patchwork@sourceware.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 22:57:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 20B8B383D5DC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1670540244; bh=JyCF77qZZzBIV7q62tahtc2/a/SmudCOw0uo7Y9ou1I=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=cVB/TphvzUztmafbIzNbiyzl6iR0Hnq4d/1bJSDudDNp48djQRB5VXO3HiF+W8Xwi dQdvgGaiiDvvY9ac0CvJ7ZeeWzViWdRvoXiTg2FP/9C8Fl55YpJZNnsF24Qr2WzPdL jKZO3W4kBQ237ZWcUr96jhfc+0QorQ895uicZQpc= X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BCDC383E422 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 22:56:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6BCDC383E422 Received: from mail-qv1-f72.google.com (mail-qv1-f72.google.com [209.85.219.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-365-VxodFdHsOYq7St0WS_4UOw-1; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 17:56:45 -0500 X-MC-Unique: VxodFdHsOYq7St0WS_4UOw-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f72.google.com with SMTP id c10-20020a05621401ea00b004c72d0e92bcso2792989qvu.12 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 14:56:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JyCF77qZZzBIV7q62tahtc2/a/SmudCOw0uo7Y9ou1I=; b=qcE44FBzdwstnQBfp/RlTDoRiiZb1RbqjVg60CApYbgJdVBPw3bRzEXfz4zE+3Mb7E siMfVoXWWodlR0t3pauEqMbP00Eip1aHpjxnStUhhxgRdKGjyA3aXlFxBAz1vZHcMuMA m5E1NJYvhPjMgUCHH4GiKGgq6VA78vekdVXNjKr6ZygX9TFX1RqCpqbP4SFkmjh6Xkvc B3TCKzKD8O1zFPJyie5RwxVZlDGABUbEm9PvJcxvuhDD458AZvg2erJ16Df+Xy0sNgO0 C14pRRGY09e17p+xh4TlLUzHU2br53pDHtl7Fq6Q5lIn3ZXEuIuO7gwCoyAovTkd8Noj NCWA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnrJVjHfuhfZha5VmfMndqjgL/6dPLV//s+tvUAReEs735c8Cch 5MICqAAx9j5aRNuUExUJZz3ueYgpX8KeBP2FbH4bash0SUPw1JAsp1wv3rIZiU3QQwFEzN2DjBl JtDNxq005oV7XkOKtyw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5490:0:b0:3a5:485e:7cc1 with SMTP id h16-20020ac85490000000b003a5485e7cc1mr4592080qtq.64.1670540204136; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 14:56:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4ziyJkkOD3AtR03NNo3VYH/21QCEfJseS3jR1eHQQkq72CLsvse8kJUwQY0nqHqrKu2z9Nlw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5490:0:b0:3a5:485e:7cc1 with SMTP id h16-20020ac85490000000b003a5485e7cc1mr4592068qtq.64.1670540203885; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 14:56:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com (2603-7000-9500-2e39-0000-0000-0000-1db4.res6.spectrum.com. [2603:7000:9500:2e39::1db4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s18-20020a05620a29d200b006f9ddaaf01esm21006448qkp.102.2022.12.08.14.56.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Dec 2022 14:56:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 17:56:41 -0500 To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> Subject: [PATCH v3] docs: Suggest options to improve ASAN stack traces Message-ID: <Y5JrqSFa/3Z2D4AR@redhat.com> References: <20221207203409.104322-1-polacek@redhat.com> <87fsdqjr15.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <Y5HwqtZkeo1xE/f+@redhat.com> <Y5H0fUumuy7FeNZX@tucnak> <Y5H1+kCo+hcQsDHU@redhat.com> <Y5H7/78c23RkIaT9@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <Y5H7/78c23RkIaT9@tucnak> User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.7 (2022-08-07) X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> From: Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" <gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org> |
Series |
[v3] docs: Suggest options to improve ASAN stack traces
|
|
Commit Message
Marek Polacek
Dec. 8, 2022, 10:56 p.m. UTC
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 04:00:15PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:34:34AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote: > > I got a complaint that while Clang docs suggest options that improve > > the quality of the backtraces ASAN prints (cf. > > <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html#usage>), our docs > > don't say anything to that effect. This patch amends that with a new > > paragraph. (It deliberately doesn't mention -fno-omit-frame-pointer.) > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * doc/invoke.texi (-fsanitize=address): Suggest options to improve > > stack traces. > > --- > > gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > index 726392409b6..1641efecf18 100644 > > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > @@ -16510,6 +16510,15 @@ The option cannot be combined with @option{-fsanitize=thread} or > > @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress}. Note that the only target > > @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress} is currently supported on is AArch64. > > > > +To get more accurate stack traces, it is possible to use options such as > > +@option{-O} (which, for instance, prevents most function inlining), > > Still not sure about this part. For one, I wonder if we shouldn't > recommend -O0, -O1 or -Og instead of just one of them, and I'm also not sure > how much function inlining is prevented with -O1. Right, that's why I put "most" in there. But I think we should mention -O0 and -Og as well. > always_inline functions are certainly inlined even at -O0 or -Og (at least > when called directly), -O1 adds > { OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS_NOT_DEBUG, OPT_finline_functions_called_once, NULL, 1 }, > to that, -O2 adds > { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_findirect_inlining, NULL, 1 }, > { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_finline_small_functions, NULL, 1 }, > { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_fpartial_inlining, NULL, 1 }, > { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_finline_functions, NULL, 1 }, > and -O3 further bumps some parameters: > { OPT_LEVELS_3_PLUS, OPT__param_max_inline_insns_auto_, NULL, 30 }, > { OPT_LEVELS_3_PLUS, OPT__param_early_inlining_insns_, NULL, 14 }, > { OPT_LEVELS_3_PLUS, OPT__param_inline_heuristics_hint_percent_, NULL, 600 }, > { OPT_LEVELS_3_PLUS, OPT__param_inline_min_speedup_, NULL, 15 }, > { OPT_LEVELS_3_PLUS, OPT__param_max_inline_insns_single_, NULL, 200 }, > > > +@option{-fno-optimize-sibling-calls} (which prevents optimizing sibling > > -fno-optimize-sibling-calls is the default for -O0/-O1/-Og; dunno if we > want to reiterate it. Can't hurt. Here's an updated patch. -- >8 -- I got a complaint that while Clang docs suggest options that improve the quality of the backtraces ASAN prints (cf. <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html#usage>), our docs don't say anything to that effect. This patch amends that with a new paragraph. (It deliberately doesn't mention -fno-omit-frame-pointer.) gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/invoke.texi (-fsanitize=address): Suggest options to improve stack traces. --- gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) base-commit: 3a9f6d5a8ee490adf9a18f93feaf86542642be7d
Comments
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:56:41PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote: > Can't hurt. Here's an updated patch. > > -- >8 -- > I got a complaint that while Clang docs suggest options that improve > the quality of the backtraces ASAN prints (cf. > <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html#usage>), our docs > don't say anything to that effect. This patch amends that with a new > paragraph. (It deliberately doesn't mention -fno-omit-frame-pointer.) > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * doc/invoke.texi (-fsanitize=address): Suggest options to improve > stack traces. Ok, thanks. > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > index 726392409b6..3f2512ce16a 100644 > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > @@ -16510,6 +16510,16 @@ The option cannot be combined with @option{-fsanitize=thread} or > @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress}. Note that the only target > @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress} is currently supported on is AArch64. > > +To get more accurate stack traces, it is possible to use options such as > +@option{-O0}, @option{-O1}, or @option{-Og} (which, for instance, prevent > +most function inlining), @option{-fno-optimize-sibling-calls} (which prevents > +optimizing sibling and tail recursive calls; this option is implicit for > +@option{-O0}, @option{-O1}, or @option{-Og}), or @option{-fno-ipa-icf} (which > +disables Identical Code Folding for functions). Since multiple runs of the > +program may yield backtraces with different addresses due to ASLR (Address > +Space Layout Randomization), it may be desirable to turn ASLR off. On Linux, > +this can be achieved with @samp{setarch `uname -m` -R ./prog}. > + > @item -fsanitize=kernel-address > @opindex fsanitize=kernel-address > Enable AddressSanitizer for Linux kernel. Jakub
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi index 726392409b6..3f2512ce16a 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi @@ -16510,6 +16510,16 @@ The option cannot be combined with @option{-fsanitize=thread} or @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress}. Note that the only target @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress} is currently supported on is AArch64. +To get more accurate stack traces, it is possible to use options such as +@option{-O0}, @option{-O1}, or @option{-Og} (which, for instance, prevent +most function inlining), @option{-fno-optimize-sibling-calls} (which prevents +optimizing sibling and tail recursive calls; this option is implicit for +@option{-O0}, @option{-O1}, or @option{-Og}), or @option{-fno-ipa-icf} (which +disables Identical Code Folding for functions). Since multiple runs of the +program may yield backtraces with different addresses due to ASLR (Address +Space Layout Randomization), it may be desirable to turn ASLR off. On Linux, +this can be achieved with @samp{setarch `uname -m` -R ./prog}. + @item -fsanitize=kernel-address @opindex fsanitize=kernel-address Enable AddressSanitizer for Linux kernel.