diff mbox series

[v2] LoongArch: testsuite:Added support for loongarch.

Message ID 20240110072521.8916-1-chenxiaolong@loongson.cn
State Committed
Commit 898c39ca80b0cd0e5a19de5e46a5802b6cadc39c
Headers
Series [v2] LoongArch: testsuite:Added support for loongarch. |

Checks

Context Check Description
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm success Testing passed
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64 success Testing passed
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm warning Patch is already merged
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64 warning Patch is already merged

Commit Message

chenxiaolong Jan. 10, 2024, 7:25 a.m. UTC 
  The function of this test is to check that the compiler supports vectorization
using SLP and vec_{load/store/*}_lanes. However, vec_{load/store/*}_lanes are
not supported on LoongArch, such as the corresponding "st4/ld4" directives on
aarch64.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c: Add loongarch.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Lulu Cheng Jan. 10, 2024, 12:18 p.m. UTC | #1 
Pushed to r14-7097.

在 2024/1/10 下午3:25, chenxiaolong 写道:
> The function of this test is to check that the compiler supports vectorization
> using SLP and vec_{load/store/*}_lanes. However, vec_{load/store/*}_lanes are
> not supported on LoongArch, such as the corresponding "st4/ld4" directives on
> aarch64.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c: Add loongarch.
> ---
>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c
> index 712a73b69d7..58751688414 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ int main (void)
>   
>      Not all vect_perm targets support that, and it's a bit too specific to have
>      its own effective-target selector, so we just test targets directly.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { target { powerpc64*-*-* s390*-*-* } } } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { target { vect_strided4 && { ! { powerpc64*-*-* s390*-*-* } } } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { target { powerpc64*-*-* s390*-*-* loongarch*-*-* } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { target { vect_strided4 && { ! { powerpc64*-*-* s390*-*-* loongarch*-*-* } } } } } } */
>   /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0 "vect"  { target { ! { vect_strided4 } } } } } */
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c
index 712a73b69d7..58751688414 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@  int main (void)
 
    Not all vect_perm targets support that, and it's a bit too specific to have
    its own effective-target selector, so we just test targets directly.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { target { powerpc64*-*-* s390*-*-* } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { target { vect_strided4 && { ! { powerpc64*-*-* s390*-*-* } } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { target { powerpc64*-*-* s390*-*-* loongarch*-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { target { vect_strided4 && { ! { powerpc64*-*-* s390*-*-* loongarch*-*-* } } } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0 "vect"  { target { ! { vect_strided4 } } } } } */