[2/3] btf: fix 'extern const void' variables [PR106773]

Message ID 20221207205734.9287-3-david.faust@oracle.com
State New
Headers
Series btf: fix BTF for extern items [PR106773] |

Commit Message

David Faust Dec. 7, 2022, 8:57 p.m. UTC
  The eBPF loader expects to find BTF_KIND_VAR records for references to
extern const void symbols. We were mistakenly identifing these as
unsupported types, and as a result skipping emitting VAR records for
them.

In addition, the internal DWARF representation from which BTF is
produced does not generate 'const' modifier DIEs for the void type,
which meant in BTF the 'const' qualifier was dropped for 'extern const
void' variables. This patch also adds support for generating a const
void type in BTF to correct emission for these variables.

	PR target/106773

gcc/

	* btfout.cc (btf_collect_datasec): Correct size of void entries.
	(btf_dvd_emit_preprocess_cb): Do not skip emitting variables which
	refer to void types.
	(btf_init_postprocess): Create 'const void' type record if needed and
	adjust variables to refer to it as appropriate.

gcc/testsuite/

	* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c: New test.
---
 gcc/btfout.cc                                 | 44 +++++++++++++++++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c | 25 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
  

Comments

Indu Bhagat Dec. 9, 2022, 7:34 a.m. UTC | #1
Looks OK to me overall. Minor comments below.

Thanks

On 12/7/22 12:57, David Faust wrote:
> The eBPF loader expects to find BTF_KIND_VAR records for references to
> extern const void symbols. We were mistakenly identifing these as
> unsupported types, and as a result skipping emitting VAR records for
> them.
> 
> In addition, the internal DWARF representation from which BTF is
> produced does not generate 'const' modifier DIEs for the void type,
> which meant in BTF the 'const' qualifier was dropped for 'extern const
> void' variables. This patch also adds support for generating a const
> void type in BTF to correct emission for these variables.
> 
> 	PR target/106773
> 
> gcc/
> 
> 	* btfout.cc (btf_collect_datasec): Correct size of void entries.
> 	(btf_dvd_emit_preprocess_cb): Do not skip emitting variables which
> 	refer to void types.
> 	(btf_init_postprocess): Create 'const void' type record if needed and
> 	adjust variables to refer to it as appropriate.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c: New test.
> ---
>   gcc/btfout.cc                                 | 44 +++++++++++++++++--
>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c | 25 +++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/btfout.cc b/gcc/btfout.cc
> index a1c6266a7db..05f3a3f9b6e 100644
> --- a/gcc/btfout.cc
> +++ b/gcc/btfout.cc
> @@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ btf_collect_datasec (ctf_container_ref ctfc)
>         tree size = DECL_SIZE_UNIT (node->decl);
>         if (tree_fits_uhwi_p (size))
>   	info.size = tree_to_uhwi (size);
> +      else if (VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (node->decl)))
> +	info.size = 1;
>   
>         /* Offset is left as 0 at compile time, to be filled in by loaders such
>   	 as libbpf.  */
> @@ -439,7 +441,7 @@ btf_dvd_emit_preprocess_cb (ctf_dvdef_ref *slot, ctf_container_ref arg_ctfc)
>     ctf_dvdef_ref var = (ctf_dvdef_ref) * slot;
>   
>     /* Do not add variables which refer to unsupported types.  */
> -  if (btf_removed_type_p (var->dvd_type))
> +  if (!voids.contains (var->dvd_type) && btf_removed_type_p (var->dvd_type))
>       return 1;
>   
>     arg_ctfc->ctfc_vars_list[num_vars_added] = var;
> @@ -1073,15 +1075,49 @@ btf_init_postprocess (void)
>   {
>     ctf_container_ref tu_ctfc = ctf_get_tu_ctfc ();
>   
> -  size_t i;
> -  size_t num_ctf_types = tu_ctfc->ctfc_types->elements ();
> -
>     holes.create (0);
>     voids.create (0);
>   
>     num_types_added = 0;
>     num_types_created = 0;
>   
> +  /* Workaround for 'const void' variables. These variables are sometimes used
> +     in eBPF programs to address kernel symbols. DWARF does not generate const
> +     qualifier on void type, so we would incorrectly emit these variables
> +     without the const qualifier.
> +     Unfortunately we need the TREE node to know it was const, and we need
> +     to create the const modifier type (if needed) now, before making the types
> +     list. So we can't avoid iterating with FOR_EACH_VARIABLE here, and then
> +     again when creating the DATASEC entries.  */

"Dot, space, space, new sentence." in 3 places.


> +  ctf_id_t constvoid_id = CTF_NULL_TYPEID;
> +  varpool_node *var;
> +  FOR_EACH_VARIABLE (var)
> +    {
> +      if (!var->decl)
> +	continue;
> +
> +      tree type = TREE_TYPE (var->decl);
> +      if (type && VOID_TYPE_P (type) && TYPE_READONLY (type))
> +	{
> +	  dw_die_ref die = lookup_decl_die (var->decl);
> +	  if (die == NULL)
> +	    continue;
> +
> +	  ctf_dvdef_ref dvd = ctf_dvd_lookup (tu_ctfc, die);
> +	  if (dvd == NULL)
> +	    continue;
> +
> +	  /* Create the 'const' modifier type for void.  */
> +	  if (constvoid_id == CTF_NULL_TYPEID)
> +	    constvoid_id = ctf_add_reftype (tu_ctfc, CTF_ADD_ROOT,
> +					    dvd->dvd_type, CTF_K_CONST, NULL);

No de-duplication of the const void type.  I assume libbpf will take 
care of this eventually.

> +	  dvd->dvd_type = constvoid_id;
> +	}
> +    }
> +
> +  size_t i;
> +  size_t num_ctf_types = tu_ctfc->ctfc_types->elements ();
> +
>     if (num_ctf_types)
>       {
>         init_btf_id_map (num_ctf_types + 1);
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..f90fa773a4b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/* Test BTF generation for extern const void symbols.
> +   BTF_KIND_VAR records should be emitted for such symbols if they are used,
> +   as well as a corresponding entry in the appropriate DATASEC record.  */
> +
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
> +
> +/* Expect 1 variable record only for foo, with 'extern' (2) linkage.  */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0xe000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_info" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_linkage" 1 } } */
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"foo.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btf_string" 1 } } */
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bts_offset" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "1\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bts_size" 1 } } */
> +
> +extern const void foo __attribute__((weak)) __attribute__((section (".ksyms")));
> +extern const void bar __attribute__((weak)) __attribute__((section (".ksyms")));
> +
> +unsigned long func () {
> +  unsigned long x = (unsigned long) &foo;
> +
> +  return x;
> +}
> +
  
David Faust Dec. 12, 2022, 8:59 p.m. UTC | #2
On 12/8/22 23:34, Indu Bhagat wrote:
> Looks OK to me overall. Minor comments below.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On 12/7/22 12:57, David Faust wrote:
>> The eBPF loader expects to find BTF_KIND_VAR records for references to
>> extern const void symbols. We were mistakenly identifing these as
>> unsupported types, and as a result skipping emitting VAR records for
>> them.
>>
>> In addition, the internal DWARF representation from which BTF is
>> produced does not generate 'const' modifier DIEs for the void type,
>> which meant in BTF the 'const' qualifier was dropped for 'extern const
>> void' variables. This patch also adds support for generating a const
>> void type in BTF to correct emission for these variables.
>>
>> 	PR target/106773
>>
>> gcc/
>>
>> 	* btfout.cc (btf_collect_datasec): Correct size of void entries.
>> 	(btf_dvd_emit_preprocess_cb): Do not skip emitting variables which
>> 	refer to void types.
>> 	(btf_init_postprocess): Create 'const void' type record if needed and
>> 	adjust variables to refer to it as appropriate.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/
>>
>> 	* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c: New test.
>> ---
>>   gcc/btfout.cc                                 | 44 +++++++++++++++++--
>>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c | 25 +++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/btfout.cc b/gcc/btfout.cc
>> index a1c6266a7db..05f3a3f9b6e 100644
>> --- a/gcc/btfout.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/btfout.cc
>> @@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ btf_collect_datasec (ctf_container_ref ctfc)
>>         tree size = DECL_SIZE_UNIT (node->decl);
>>         if (tree_fits_uhwi_p (size))
>>   	info.size = tree_to_uhwi (size);
>> +      else if (VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (node->decl)))
>> +	info.size = 1;
>>   
>>         /* Offset is left as 0 at compile time, to be filled in by loaders such
>>   	 as libbpf.  */
>> @@ -439,7 +441,7 @@ btf_dvd_emit_preprocess_cb (ctf_dvdef_ref *slot, ctf_container_ref arg_ctfc)
>>     ctf_dvdef_ref var = (ctf_dvdef_ref) * slot;
>>   
>>     /* Do not add variables which refer to unsupported types.  */
>> -  if (btf_removed_type_p (var->dvd_type))
>> +  if (!voids.contains (var->dvd_type) && btf_removed_type_p (var->dvd_type))
>>       return 1;
>>   
>>     arg_ctfc->ctfc_vars_list[num_vars_added] = var;
>> @@ -1073,15 +1075,49 @@ btf_init_postprocess (void)
>>   {
>>     ctf_container_ref tu_ctfc = ctf_get_tu_ctfc ();
>>   
>> -  size_t i;
>> -  size_t num_ctf_types = tu_ctfc->ctfc_types->elements ();
>> -
>>     holes.create (0);
>>     voids.create (0);
>>   
>>     num_types_added = 0;
>>     num_types_created = 0;
>>   
>> +  /* Workaround for 'const void' variables. These variables are sometimes used
>> +     in eBPF programs to address kernel symbols. DWARF does not generate const
>> +     qualifier on void type, so we would incorrectly emit these variables
>> +     without the const qualifier.
>> +     Unfortunately we need the TREE node to know it was const, and we need
>> +     to create the const modifier type (if needed) now, before making the types
>> +     list. So we can't avoid iterating with FOR_EACH_VARIABLE here, and then
>> +     again when creating the DATASEC entries.  */
> 
> "Dot, space, space, new sentence." in 3 places.
> 
> 
>> +  ctf_id_t constvoid_id = CTF_NULL_TYPEID;
>> +  varpool_node *var;
>> +  FOR_EACH_VARIABLE (var)
>> +    {
>> +      if (!var->decl)
>> +	continue;
>> +
>> +      tree type = TREE_TYPE (var->decl);
>> +      if (type && VOID_TYPE_P (type) && TYPE_READONLY (type))
>> +	{
>> +	  dw_die_ref die = lookup_decl_die (var->decl);
>> +	  if (die == NULL)
>> +	    continue;
>> +
>> +	  ctf_dvdef_ref dvd = ctf_dvd_lookup (tu_ctfc, die);
>> +	  if (dvd == NULL)
>> +	    continue;
>> +
>> +	  /* Create the 'const' modifier type for void.  */
>> +	  if (constvoid_id == CTF_NULL_TYPEID)
>> +	    constvoid_id = ctf_add_reftype (tu_ctfc, CTF_ADD_ROOT,
>> +					    dvd->dvd_type, CTF_K_CONST, NULL);
> 
> No de-duplication of the const void type.  I assume libbpf will take 
> care of this eventually.

Hm, not sure I follow. Where is the duplication? The const void type is
only created once here, for the first such variable which needs it, and
reused for subsequent variables. And it does not already exist in the
CTF which we are translating into BTF.

In any case, yes libbpf can handle duplicated types. Though it would
still be good to minimize that where we can to not bloat the BTF info.

> 
>> +	  dvd->dvd_type = constvoid_id;
>> +	}
>> +    }
>> +
>> +  size_t i;
>> +  size_t num_ctf_types = tu_ctfc->ctfc_types->elements ();
>> +
>>     if (num_ctf_types)
>>       {
>>         init_btf_id_map (num_ctf_types + 1);
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..f90fa773a4b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>> +/* Test BTF generation for extern const void symbols.
>> +   BTF_KIND_VAR records should be emitted for such symbols if they are used,
>> +   as well as a corresponding entry in the appropriate DATASEC record.  */
>> +
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
>> +
>> +/* Expect 1 variable record only for foo, with 'extern' (2) linkage.  */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0xe000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_info" 1 } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_linkage" 1 } } */
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"foo.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btf_string" 1 } } */
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bts_offset" 1 } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "1\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bts_size" 1 } } */
>> +
>> +extern const void foo __attribute__((weak)) __attribute__((section (".ksyms")));
>> +extern const void bar __attribute__((weak)) __attribute__((section (".ksyms")));
>> +
>> +unsigned long func () {
>> +  unsigned long x = (unsigned long) &foo;
>> +
>> +  return x;
>> +}
>> +
>
  
Indu Bhagat Dec. 13, 2022, 6:11 a.m. UTC | #3
On 12/12/22 12:59, David Faust wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/8/22 23:34, Indu Bhagat wrote:
>> Looks OK to me overall. Minor comments below.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On 12/7/22 12:57, David Faust wrote:
>>> The eBPF loader expects to find BTF_KIND_VAR records for references to
>>> extern const void symbols. We were mistakenly identifing these as
>>> unsupported types, and as a result skipping emitting VAR records for
>>> them.
>>>
>>> In addition, the internal DWARF representation from which BTF is
>>> produced does not generate 'const' modifier DIEs for the void type,
>>> which meant in BTF the 'const' qualifier was dropped for 'extern const
>>> void' variables. This patch also adds support for generating a const
>>> void type in BTF to correct emission for these variables.
>>>
>>> 	PR target/106773
>>>
>>> gcc/
>>>
>>> 	* btfout.cc (btf_collect_datasec): Correct size of void entries.
>>> 	(btf_dvd_emit_preprocess_cb): Do not skip emitting variables which
>>> 	refer to void types.
>>> 	(btf_init_postprocess): Create 'const void' type record if needed and
>>> 	adjust variables to refer to it as appropriate.
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>>
>>> 	* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c: New test.
>>> ---
>>>    gcc/btfout.cc                                 | 44 +++++++++++++++++--
>>>    gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c | 25 +++++++++++
>>>    2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>    create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/btfout.cc b/gcc/btfout.cc
>>> index a1c6266a7db..05f3a3f9b6e 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/btfout.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/btfout.cc
>>> @@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ btf_collect_datasec (ctf_container_ref ctfc)
>>>          tree size = DECL_SIZE_UNIT (node->decl);
>>>          if (tree_fits_uhwi_p (size))
>>>    	info.size = tree_to_uhwi (size);
>>> +      else if (VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (node->decl)))
>>> +	info.size = 1;
>>>    
>>>          /* Offset is left as 0 at compile time, to be filled in by loaders such
>>>    	 as libbpf.  */
>>> @@ -439,7 +441,7 @@ btf_dvd_emit_preprocess_cb (ctf_dvdef_ref *slot, ctf_container_ref arg_ctfc)
>>>      ctf_dvdef_ref var = (ctf_dvdef_ref) * slot;
>>>    
>>>      /* Do not add variables which refer to unsupported types.  */
>>> -  if (btf_removed_type_p (var->dvd_type))
>>> +  if (!voids.contains (var->dvd_type) && btf_removed_type_p (var->dvd_type))
>>>        return 1;
>>>    
>>>      arg_ctfc->ctfc_vars_list[num_vars_added] = var;
>>> @@ -1073,15 +1075,49 @@ btf_init_postprocess (void)
>>>    {
>>>      ctf_container_ref tu_ctfc = ctf_get_tu_ctfc ();
>>>    
>>> -  size_t i;
>>> -  size_t num_ctf_types = tu_ctfc->ctfc_types->elements ();
>>> -
>>>      holes.create (0);
>>>      voids.create (0);
>>>    
>>>      num_types_added = 0;
>>>      num_types_created = 0;
>>>    
>>> +  /* Workaround for 'const void' variables. These variables are sometimes used
>>> +     in eBPF programs to address kernel symbols. DWARF does not generate const
>>> +     qualifier on void type, so we would incorrectly emit these variables
>>> +     without the const qualifier.
>>> +     Unfortunately we need the TREE node to know it was const, and we need
>>> +     to create the const modifier type (if needed) now, before making the types
>>> +     list. So we can't avoid iterating with FOR_EACH_VARIABLE here, and then
>>> +     again when creating the DATASEC entries.  */
>>
>> "Dot, space, space, new sentence." in 3 places.
>>
>>
>>> +  ctf_id_t constvoid_id = CTF_NULL_TYPEID;
>>> +  varpool_node *var;
>>> +  FOR_EACH_VARIABLE (var)
>>> +    {
>>> +      if (!var->decl)
>>> +	continue;
>>> +
>>> +      tree type = TREE_TYPE (var->decl);
>>> +      if (type && VOID_TYPE_P (type) && TYPE_READONLY (type))
>>> +	{
>>> +	  dw_die_ref die = lookup_decl_die (var->decl);
>>> +	  if (die == NULL)
>>> +	    continue;
>>> +
>>> +	  ctf_dvdef_ref dvd = ctf_dvd_lookup (tu_ctfc, die);
>>> +	  if (dvd == NULL)
>>> +	    continue;
>>> +
>>> +	  /* Create the 'const' modifier type for void.  */
>>> +	  if (constvoid_id == CTF_NULL_TYPEID)
>>> +	    constvoid_id = ctf_add_reftype (tu_ctfc, CTF_ADD_ROOT,
>>> +					    dvd->dvd_type, CTF_K_CONST, NULL);
>>
>> No de-duplication of the const void type.  I assume libbpf will take
>> care of this eventually.
> 
> Hm, not sure I follow. Where is the duplication? The const void type is
> only created once here, for the first such variable which needs it, and
> reused for subsequent variables. And it does not already exist in the
> CTF which we are translating into BTF.
> 

You're right - you are reusing the const void type once generated for a 
CU for each usage. My bad - I didnt follow the code properly :)

> In any case, yes libbpf can handle duplicated types. Though it would
> still be good to minimize that where we can to not bloat the BTF info.
> 
>>
>>> +	  dvd->dvd_type = constvoid_id;
>>> +	}
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +  size_t i;
>>> +  size_t num_ctf_types = tu_ctfc->ctfc_types->elements ();
>>> +
>>>      if (num_ctf_types)
>>>        {
>>>          init_btf_id_map (num_ctf_types + 1);
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..f90fa773a4b
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>>> +/* Test BTF generation for extern const void symbols.
>>> +   BTF_KIND_VAR records should be emitted for such symbols if they are used,
>>> +   as well as a corresponding entry in the appropriate DATASEC record.  */
>>> +
>>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>>> +/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
>>> +
>>> +/* Expect 1 variable record only for foo, with 'extern' (2) linkage.  */
>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0xe000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_info" 1 } } */
>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_linkage" 1 } } */
>>> +
>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"foo.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btf_string" 1 } } */
>>> +
>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bts_offset" 1 } } */
>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "1\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bts_size" 1 } } */
>>> +
>>> +extern const void foo __attribute__((weak)) __attribute__((section (".ksyms")));
>>> +extern const void bar __attribute__((weak)) __attribute__((section (".ksyms")));
>>> +
>>> +unsigned long func () {
>>> +  unsigned long x = (unsigned long) &foo;
>>> +
>>> +  return x;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
  

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/btfout.cc b/gcc/btfout.cc
index a1c6266a7db..05f3a3f9b6e 100644
--- a/gcc/btfout.cc
+++ b/gcc/btfout.cc
@@ -354,6 +354,8 @@  btf_collect_datasec (ctf_container_ref ctfc)
       tree size = DECL_SIZE_UNIT (node->decl);
       if (tree_fits_uhwi_p (size))
 	info.size = tree_to_uhwi (size);
+      else if (VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (node->decl)))
+	info.size = 1;
 
       /* Offset is left as 0 at compile time, to be filled in by loaders such
 	 as libbpf.  */
@@ -439,7 +441,7 @@  btf_dvd_emit_preprocess_cb (ctf_dvdef_ref *slot, ctf_container_ref arg_ctfc)
   ctf_dvdef_ref var = (ctf_dvdef_ref) * slot;
 
   /* Do not add variables which refer to unsupported types.  */
-  if (btf_removed_type_p (var->dvd_type))
+  if (!voids.contains (var->dvd_type) && btf_removed_type_p (var->dvd_type))
     return 1;
 
   arg_ctfc->ctfc_vars_list[num_vars_added] = var;
@@ -1073,15 +1075,49 @@  btf_init_postprocess (void)
 {
   ctf_container_ref tu_ctfc = ctf_get_tu_ctfc ();
 
-  size_t i;
-  size_t num_ctf_types = tu_ctfc->ctfc_types->elements ();
-
   holes.create (0);
   voids.create (0);
 
   num_types_added = 0;
   num_types_created = 0;
 
+  /* Workaround for 'const void' variables. These variables are sometimes used
+     in eBPF programs to address kernel symbols. DWARF does not generate const
+     qualifier on void type, so we would incorrectly emit these variables
+     without the const qualifier.
+     Unfortunately we need the TREE node to know it was const, and we need
+     to create the const modifier type (if needed) now, before making the types
+     list. So we can't avoid iterating with FOR_EACH_VARIABLE here, and then
+     again when creating the DATASEC entries.  */
+  ctf_id_t constvoid_id = CTF_NULL_TYPEID;
+  varpool_node *var;
+  FOR_EACH_VARIABLE (var)
+    {
+      if (!var->decl)
+	continue;
+
+      tree type = TREE_TYPE (var->decl);
+      if (type && VOID_TYPE_P (type) && TYPE_READONLY (type))
+	{
+	  dw_die_ref die = lookup_decl_die (var->decl);
+	  if (die == NULL)
+	    continue;
+
+	  ctf_dvdef_ref dvd = ctf_dvd_lookup (tu_ctfc, die);
+	  if (dvd == NULL)
+	    continue;
+
+	  /* Create the 'const' modifier type for void.  */
+	  if (constvoid_id == CTF_NULL_TYPEID)
+	    constvoid_id = ctf_add_reftype (tu_ctfc, CTF_ADD_ROOT,
+					    dvd->dvd_type, CTF_K_CONST, NULL);
+	  dvd->dvd_type = constvoid_id;
+	}
+    }
+
+  size_t i;
+  size_t num_ctf_types = tu_ctfc->ctfc_types->elements ();
+
   if (num_ctf_types)
     {
       init_btf_id_map (num_ctf_types + 1);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f90fa773a4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-pr106773.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ 
+/* Test BTF generation for extern const void symbols.
+   BTF_KIND_VAR records should be emitted for such symbols if they are used,
+   as well as a corresponding entry in the appropriate DATASEC record.  */
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
+
+/* Expect 1 variable record only for foo, with 'extern' (2) linkage.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0xe000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_info" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btv_linkage" 1 } } */
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"foo.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btf_string" 1 } } */
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bts_offset" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "1\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*bts_size" 1 } } */
+
+extern const void foo __attribute__((weak)) __attribute__((section (".ksyms")));
+extern const void bar __attribute__((weak)) __attribute__((section (".ksyms")));
+
+unsigned long func () {
+  unsigned long x = (unsigned long) &foo;
+
+  return x;
+}
+