[pushed] c++: operator new lookup [PR98249]

Message ID 20220411213117.2948304-1-jason@redhat.com
State Committed
Commit d087b59527a658a4de13febbb593edbf03339e93
Headers
Series [pushed] c++: operator new lookup [PR98249] |

Commit Message

Jason Merrill April 11, 2022, 9:31 p.m. UTC
  The standard says, as we quote in the comment just above, that if we don't
find operator new in the allocated type, it should be looked up in the
global scope.  This is specifically ::, not just any namespace, and we
already give an error for an operator new declared in any other namespace.

Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.

	PR c++/98249

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* call.cc (build_operator_new_call): Just look in ::.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/lookup/new3.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/call.cc                     |  3 +--
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/new3.C | 10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/new3.C


base-commit: b1124648ff8f655307f264d7b353fd68e3b03e9c
  

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
index 73fede5a3df..3a8d7e4b131 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
@@ -4899,8 +4899,7 @@  build_operator_new_call (tree fnname, vec<tree, va_gc> **args,
        up in the global scope.
 
      we disregard block-scope declarations of "operator new".  */
-  fns = lookup_name (fnname, LOOK_where::NAMESPACE);
-  fns = lookup_arg_dependent (fnname, fns, *args);
+  fns = lookup_qualified_name (global_namespace, fnname);
 
   if (align_arg)
     {
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/new3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/new3.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..36afb5b48e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/new3.C
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ 
+// PR c++/98249
+
+#include <new>
+struct Incomplete;
+template<class T> struct Holder { T t; };
+Holder<Incomplete> *p;
+void test() {
+    ::new (p) int;
+    new (p) int;
+}