While there doesn't look to be anything wrong with this override,
there's also no apparent reason why this override would be needed. Drop
it, reducing overall size a tiny bit.
@@ -198,8 +198,6 @@ struct v850_seg_entry v850_seg_table[] =
{ NULL, ".call_table_text",
SEC_ALLOC | SEC_LOAD | SEC_RELOC | SEC_READONLY | SEC_CODE
| SEC_HAS_CONTENTS},
- { NULL, ".bss",
- SEC_ALLOC }
};
#define SDATA_SECTION 0
@@ -215,7 +213,6 @@ struct v850_seg_entry v850_seg_table[] =
#define ZCOMMON_SECTION 10
#define CALL_TABLE_DATA_SECTION 11
#define CALL_TABLE_TEXT_SECTION 12
-#define BSS_SECTION 13
static void
do_v850_seg (int i, subsegT sub)
@@ -578,7 +575,6 @@ const pseudo_typeS md_pseudo_table[] =
{ "zbss", v850_seg, ZBSS_SECTION },
{ "rosdata", v850_seg, ROSDATA_SECTION },
{ "rozdata", v850_seg, ROZDATA_SECTION },
- { "bss", v850_seg, BSS_SECTION },
{ "offset", v850_offset, 0 },
{ "word", cons, 4 },
{ "zcomm", v850_comm, ZCOMMON_SECTION },
@@ -1969,7 +1965,6 @@ md_begin (void)
op++;
}
- v850_seg_table[BSS_SECTION].s = bss_section;
bfd_set_arch_mach (stdoutput, v850_target_arch, machine);
bfd_set_private_flags (stdoutput, v850_e_flags);
}