Commit Message
On 01/19/2016 02:33 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 01/19/2016 09:32 PM, Paul E. Murphy wrote:
>> +/* True if pthread_barrier_wait returns without an error. */
>> +static inline bool
>> +is_invalid_barrier_ret (int x)
>> +{
>> + return x != 0 && x != PTHREAD_BARRIER_SERIAL_THREAD;
>> +}
>
> Sorry, just realized that the comment is wrong, should be “returned
> *with* an error”. :-/
Thanks for point that out.
Sigh, third time is a charm? I rewrote the comment.
> Otherwise, still okay from my point of view.
>
> Florian
>
Comments
"Paul E. Murphy" <murphyp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> On 01/19/2016 02:33 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 01/19/2016 09:32 PM, Paul E. Murphy wrote:
>>> +/* True if pthread_barrier_wait returns without an error. */
>>> +static inline bool
>>> +is_invalid_barrier_ret (int x)
>>> +{
>>> + return x != 0 && x != PTHREAD_BARRIER_SERIAL_THREAD;
>>> +}
>>
>> Sorry, just realized that the comment is wrong, should be “returned
>> *with* an error”. :-/
>
> Thanks for point that out.
>
> Sigh, third time is a charm? I rewrote the comment.
Pushed as fad7e4d7 for 2.23.
From e1d9083bc36a707ffcea6df9fd2b432c60f10122 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Paul E. Murphy" <murphyp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:42:44 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Fix nptl/tst-setuid3.c
pthread_barrier_wait can return either PTHREAD_BARRIER_SERIAL_THREAD
or 0. Posix makes no guarantees about which thread return the unique
value.
Additionally, pthread_join was not called despite seemingly checking
for the error.
2016-01-19 Paul E. Murphy <murphyp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* nptl/tst-setuid3.c (is_invalid_barrier_ret): New function.
(thread_func): Use new function to simplify barrier check.
(do_test): Use new function to simplify checking barrier exit
code, and actually join the child thread.
---
nptl/tst-setuid3.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
@@ -33,14 +33,21 @@ static pthread_barrier_t barrier2;
#define FAIL_ERR(fmt, ...) \
do { printf ("FAIL: " fmt ": %m\n", __VA_ARGS__); _exit (1); } while (0)
+/* True if x is not a successful return code from pthread_barrier_wait. */
+static inline bool
+is_invalid_barrier_ret (int x)
+{
+ return x != 0 && x != PTHREAD_BARRIER_SERIAL_THREAD;
+}
+
static void *
thread_func (void *ctx __attribute__ ((unused)))
{
int ret = pthread_barrier_wait (&barrier1);
- if (ret != PTHREAD_BARRIER_SERIAL_THREAD && ret != 0)
+ if (is_invalid_barrier_ret (ret))
FAIL ("pthread_barrier_wait (barrier1) (on thread): %d", ret);
ret = pthread_barrier_wait (&barrier2);
- if (ret != PTHREAD_BARRIER_SERIAL_THREAD && ret != 0)
+ if (is_invalid_barrier_ret (ret))
FAIL ("pthread_barrier_wait (barrier2) (on thread): %d", ret);
return NULL;
}
@@ -86,7 +93,7 @@ do_test (void)
/* Ensure that the thread is running properly. */
ret = pthread_barrier_wait (&barrier1);
- if (ret != 0)
+ if (is_invalid_barrier_ret (ret))
FAIL ("pthread_barrier_wait (barrier1): %d", ret);
setuid_failure (2);
@@ -97,10 +104,11 @@ do_test (void)
/* Shutdown. */
ret = pthread_barrier_wait (&barrier2);
- if (ret != PTHREAD_BARRIER_SERIAL_THREAD && ret != 0)
+ if (is_invalid_barrier_ret (ret))
FAIL ("pthread_barrier_wait (barrier2): %d", ret);
- if (ret != PTHREAD_BARRIER_SERIAL_THREAD && ret != 0)
+ ret = pthread_join (thread, NULL);
+ if (ret != 0)
FAIL ("pthread_join: %d", ret);
return 0;
--
2.4.3