[gdb/testsuite] Add PR26286 kfail in gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp
Checks
Context |
Check |
Description |
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_build--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Testing passed
|
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_build--master-arm |
success
|
Testing passed
|
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm |
success
|
Testing passed
|
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Testing passed
|
Commit Message
When running test-case gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp, I run
regularly into PR26286:
...
(gdb) continue^M
Continuing.^M
[LWP ... exited]^M
...
[LWP ... exited]^M
^M
Program terminated with signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.^M
The program no longer exists.^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 9: \
break at break_fn: 1
...
Add a kfail for this, such that we have:
...
(gdb) KFAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 9: \
break at break_fn: 1 (PRMS: threads/26286)
...
Tested on x86_64-linux.
---
.../attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
base-commit: d3daf5a2ba551707c74813e80be2b53d63a73a25
Comments
Hello Tom,
Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes:
> When running test-case gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp, I run
> regularly into PR26286:
> ...
> (gdb) continue^M
> Continuing.^M
> [LWP ... exited]^M
> ...
> [LWP ... exited]^M
> ^M
> Program terminated with signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.^M
> The program no longer exists.^M
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 9: \
> break at break_fn: 1
> ...
>
> Add a kfail for this, such that we have:
> ...
> (gdb) KFAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 9: \
> break at break_fn: 1 (PRMS: threads/26286)
> ...
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
Good idea. Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
On 5/24/24 03:57, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes:
>
>> When running test-case gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp, I run
>> regularly into PR26286:
>> ...
>> (gdb) continue^M
>> Continuing.^M
>> [LWP ... exited]^M
>> ...
>> [LWP ... exited]^M
>> ^M
>> Program terminated with signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.^M
>> The program no longer exists.^M
>> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 9: \
>> break at break_fn: 1
>> ...
>>
>> Add a kfail for this, such that we have:
>> ...
>> (gdb) KFAIL: gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter 9: \
>> break at break_fn: 1 (PRMS: threads/26286)
>> ...
>>
>> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>
> Good idea. Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
>
Thanks for the review, pushed.
Thanks,
- Tom
@@ -141,9 +141,32 @@ proc test {} {
# attach.
sleep 2
+ set re_pr26286 \
+ [multi_line \
+ [string_to_regexp \
+ "Program terminated with signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap."] \
+ [string_to_regexp \
+ "The program no longer exists."]]
+
set bps 3
+ set exited 0
for {set bp 1} { $bp <= $bps } { incr bp } {
- gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*" "break at break_fn: $bp"
+ gdb_test_multiple "continue" "break at break_fn: $bp" {
+ -re -wrap "$re_pr26286" {
+ kfail threads/26286 $gdb_test_name
+ set exited 1
+ }
+ -re -wrap "Breakpoint.*" {
+ pass $gdb_test_name
+ }
+ }
+ if { $exited } {
+ break
+ }
+ }
+
+ if { $exited } {
+ return
}
if {$attempt < $attempts} {