NEWS: Intel CET support hasn't be validated for i686
Commit Message
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Rical Jasan <rj@2c3t.io> wrote:
> On 07/19/2018 10:51 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> ...
>> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
>> index daef815ae7..c6541f2004 100644
>> --- a/NEWS
>> +++ b/NEWS
>> @@ -17,7 +17,10 @@ Major new features:
>> feature is currently supported on i386, x86_64 and x32 with GCC 8 and
>> binutils 2.29 or later. Note that CET-enabled glibc requires CPUs
>> capable of multi-byte NOPs, like x86-64 processors as well as Intel
>> - Pentium Pro or newer.
>> + Pentium Pro or newer. NOTE: --enable-cet has been tested for i686,
>> + x86_64 and x32 on non-CET processors. --enable-cet has been tested
>> + for x86_64 and x32 on CET SDVs. But Intel CET support hasn't been
>
> "SDVs, but"
>
>> + validated for i686.
>>
>> * The GNU C Library now has correct support for ABSOLUTE symbols
>> (SHN_ABS-relative symbols). Previously such ABSOLUTE symbols were
>> diff --git a/manual/install.texi b/manual/install.texi
>> index 3a87ac8bb5..61d3b1324a 100644
>> --- a/manual/install.texi
>> +++ b/manual/install.texi
>> @@ -148,6 +148,11 @@ Note that when CET is enabled, @theglibc{} requires CPUs capable of
>> multi-byte NOPs, like x86-64 processors as well as Intel Pentium Pro or
>> newer.
>>
>> +NOTE: @option{--enable-cet} has been tested for i686, x86_64 and x32
>> +on non-CET processors. @option{--enable-cet} has been tested for
>> +x86_64 and x32 on CET SDVs. But Intel CET support hasn't been validated
>
> Same here.
>
Like this?
Comments
On 07/19/2018 11:22 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Like this?
Yep.
Rical
From 58dbe6cd8fb4f81ae0e858f832dfd6079f7e1bbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:55:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] INSTALL: Add a note for Intel CET status
* NEWS: Add a note for Intel CET status.
* manual/install.texi: Add a note for Intel CET status.
* INSTALL: Regenerated.
---
INSTALL | 5 +++++
NEWS | 5 ++++-
manual/install.texi | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -117,6 +117,11 @@ if 'CFLAGS' is specified it must enable optimization. For example:
the GNU C Library requires CPUs capable of multi-byte NOPs, like
x86-64 processors as well as Intel Pentium Pro or newer.
+ NOTE: '--enable-cet' has been tested for i686, x86_64 and x32 on
+ non-CET processors. '--enable-cet' has been tested for x86_64 and
+ x32 on CET SDVs, but Intel CET support hasn't been validated for
+ i686.
+
'--disable-profile'
Don't build libraries with profiling information. You may want to
use this option if you don't plan to do profiling.
@@ -17,7 +17,10 @@ Major new features:
feature is currently supported on i386, x86_64 and x32 with GCC 8 and
binutils 2.29 or later. Note that CET-enabled glibc requires CPUs
capable of multi-byte NOPs, like x86-64 processors as well as Intel
- Pentium Pro or newer.
+ Pentium Pro or newer. NOTE: --enable-cet has been tested for i686,
+ x86_64 and x32 on non-CET processors. --enable-cet has been tested
+ for x86_64 and x32 on CET SDVs, but Intel CET support hasn't been
+ validated for i686.
* The GNU C Library now has correct support for ABSOLUTE symbols
(SHN_ABS-relative symbols). Previously such ABSOLUTE symbols were
@@ -148,6 +148,11 @@ Note that when CET is enabled, @theglibc{} requires CPUs capable of
multi-byte NOPs, like x86-64 processors as well as Intel Pentium Pro or
newer.
+NOTE: @option{--enable-cet} has been tested for i686, x86_64 and x32
+on non-CET processors. @option{--enable-cet} has been tested for
+x86_64 and x32 on CET SDVs, but Intel CET support hasn't been validated
+for i686.
+
@item --disable-profile
Don't build libraries with profiling information. You may want to use
this option if you don't plan to do profiling.
--
2.17.1