[v10,6/7] riscv: Add ifunc helper method to hwprobe.h
Checks
Context |
Check |
Description |
redhat-pt-bot/TryBot-apply_patch |
success
|
Patch applied to master at the time it was sent
|
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_glibc_build--master-arm |
success
|
Testing passed
|
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Testing passed
|
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Testing passed
|
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm |
success
|
Testing passed
|
Commit Message
Add a little helper method so it's easier to fetch a single value from
the hwprobe function when used within an ifunc selector.
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
---
Changes in v10:
- Avoid implicit comparisons (Adhemerval)
Changes in v9:
- Use __inline rather than inline so c89 compiles (build-many-glibcs)
Changes in v7:
- Introduced static inline helper (Richard)
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/sys/hwprobe.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
Comments
On 13/12/23 18:11, Evan Green wrote:
> Add a little helper method so it's easier to fetch a single value from
> the hwprobe function when used within an ifunc selector.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v10:
> - Avoid implicit comparisons (Adhemerval)
>
> Changes in v9:
> - Use __inline rather than inline so c89 compiles (build-many-glibcs)
>
> Changes in v7:
> - Introduced static inline helper (Richard)
>
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/sys/hwprobe.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/sys/hwprobe.h b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/sys/hwprobe.h
> index c4e3927667..d85d49cd73 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/sys/hwprobe.h
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/sys/hwprobe.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>
> #include <features.h>
> #include <stddef.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> #ifdef __has_include
> # if __has_include (<asm/hwprobe.h>)
> # include <asm/hwprobe.h>
> @@ -81,4 +82,28 @@ typedef int (*__riscv_hwprobe_t) (struct riscv_hwprobe *__pairs, size_t __pair_c
>
> __END_DECLS
>
> +/* Helper function usable from ifunc selectors that probes a single key. */
> +static __inline int
> +__riscv_hwprobe_one(__riscv_hwprobe_t hwprobe_func,
Space after function name.
> + signed long long int key,
I think you code guidelines says there is no need to add signed for
int.
> + unsigned long long int *value)
Any reason why you have declared it outside __BEGIN_DECLS/__END_DECLS? Afaiu,
if the function can no be inlined it would be subject to C++ mangling (not
sure if it would be an issue). The x86.h defines within the extern 'C'.
> +{
> + struct riscv_hwprobe pair;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (hwprobe_func == NULL)
> + return ENOSYS;
> +
> + pair.key = key;
> + rc = hwprobe_func (&pair, 1, 0, NULL, 0);
> + if (rc != 0)
> + return rc;
> +
> + if (pair.key < 0)
> + return ENOENT;
> +
> + *value = pair.value;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* sys/hwprobe.h */
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <features.h>
#include <stddef.h>
+#include <errno.h>
#ifdef __has_include
# if __has_include (<asm/hwprobe.h>)
# include <asm/hwprobe.h>
@@ -81,4 +82,28 @@ typedef int (*__riscv_hwprobe_t) (struct riscv_hwprobe *__pairs, size_t __pair_c
__END_DECLS
+/* Helper function usable from ifunc selectors that probes a single key. */
+static __inline int
+__riscv_hwprobe_one(__riscv_hwprobe_t hwprobe_func,
+ signed long long int key,
+ unsigned long long int *value)
+{
+ struct riscv_hwprobe pair;
+ int rc;
+
+ if (hwprobe_func == NULL)
+ return ENOSYS;
+
+ pair.key = key;
+ rc = hwprobe_func (&pair, 1, 0, NULL, 0);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ if (pair.key < 0)
+ return ENOENT;
+
+ *value = pair.value;
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* sys/hwprobe.h */