[2/2] linux: Return unsupported if procfs can not be mount on tst-ttyname-namespace
Checks
| Context |
Check |
Description |
| redhat-pt-bot/TryBot-apply_patch |
success
|
Patch applied to master at the time it was sent
|
| redhat-pt-bot/TryBot-32bit |
success
|
Build for i686
|
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_glibc_build--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Testing passed
|
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_glibc_build--master-arm |
success
|
Testing passed
|
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Testing passed
|
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm |
success
|
Testing passed
|
Commit Message
Trying to mount procfs can fail due multiples reasons: proc is locked
due the container configuration, mount syscall is filtered by a
Linux Secuirty Module, or any other security or hardening mechanism
that Linux might eventually add.
The tests does require a new procfs without binding to parent, and
to fully fix it would require to change how the container was created
(which is out of the scope of the test itself). Instead of trying to
foresee any possible scenario, if procfs can not be mount fail with
unsupported.
Checked on aarch64-linux-gnu.
---
.../unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname-namespace.c | 28 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Comments
On 2023-06-12 14:30, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Trying to mount procfs can fail due multiples reasons: proc is locked
> due the container configuration, mount syscall is filtered by a
> Linux Secuirty Module, or any other security or hardening mechanism
> that Linux might eventually add.
>
> The tests does require a new procfs without binding to parent, and
> to fully fix it would require to change how the container was created
> (which is out of the scope of the test itself). Instead of trying to
> foresee any possible scenario, if procfs can not be mount fail with
> unsupported.
>
> Checked on aarch64-linux-gnu.
> ---
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>
> .../unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname-namespace.c | 28 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname-namespace.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname-namespace.c
> index 1f38442747..cd5e79d39b 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname-namespace.c
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname-namespace.c
> @@ -94,8 +94,17 @@ do_in_chroot_2 (int (*cb)(const char *, int))
> VERIFY (read (exit_pipe[0], &c, 1) == 0);
> xclose (exit_pipe[0]);
>
> - VERIFY (mount ("proc", "/proc", "proc",
> - MS_NOSUID|MS_NOEXEC|MS_NODEV, NULL) == 0);
> + if (mount ("proc", "/proc", "proc",
> + MS_NOSUID|MS_NOEXEC|MS_NODEV, NULL) != 0)
> + {
> + /* This happens if we're trying to create a nested container,
> + like if the build is running under podman, and we lack
> + priviledges. */
> + if (errno == EPERM)
> + _exit (EXIT_UNSUPPORTED);
> + else
> + _exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
>
> char *linkname = xasprintf ("/proc/self/fd/%d", slave);
> char *target = proc_fd_readlink (linkname);
> @@ -104,8 +113,9 @@ do_in_chroot_2 (int (*cb)(const char *, int))
>
> _exit (cb (slavename, slave));
> }
> - xwrite (pid_pipe[1], &pid, sizeof pid);
> - _exit (0);
> + int status;
> + xwaitpid (pid, &status, 0);
> + _exit (WEXITSTATUS (status));
> }
> xclose (pid_pipe[1]);
> xclose (exit_pipe[0]);
> @@ -117,17 +127,11 @@ do_in_chroot_2 (int (*cb)(const char *, int))
> VERIFY (WIFEXITED (status));
> int ret = WEXITSTATUS (status);
> if (ret != 0)
> - return ret;
> + FAIL_UNSUPPORTED ("unable to mount /proc on inner child process");
>
> - /* set 'pid' to the inner child */
> - VERIFY (read (pid_pipe[0], &pid, sizeof pid) == sizeof pid);
> xclose (pid_pipe[0]);
>
> - /* wait for the inner child */
> - xwaitpid (pid, &status, 0);
> - VERIFY (WIFEXITED (status));
> - xclose (master);
> - return WEXITSTATUS (status);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int
@@ -94,8 +94,17 @@ do_in_chroot_2 (int (*cb)(const char *, int))
VERIFY (read (exit_pipe[0], &c, 1) == 0);
xclose (exit_pipe[0]);
- VERIFY (mount ("proc", "/proc", "proc",
- MS_NOSUID|MS_NOEXEC|MS_NODEV, NULL) == 0);
+ if (mount ("proc", "/proc", "proc",
+ MS_NOSUID|MS_NOEXEC|MS_NODEV, NULL) != 0)
+ {
+ /* This happens if we're trying to create a nested container,
+ like if the build is running under podman, and we lack
+ priviledges. */
+ if (errno == EPERM)
+ _exit (EXIT_UNSUPPORTED);
+ else
+ _exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
char *linkname = xasprintf ("/proc/self/fd/%d", slave);
char *target = proc_fd_readlink (linkname);
@@ -104,8 +113,9 @@ do_in_chroot_2 (int (*cb)(const char *, int))
_exit (cb (slavename, slave));
}
- xwrite (pid_pipe[1], &pid, sizeof pid);
- _exit (0);
+ int status;
+ xwaitpid (pid, &status, 0);
+ _exit (WEXITSTATUS (status));
}
xclose (pid_pipe[1]);
xclose (exit_pipe[0]);
@@ -117,17 +127,11 @@ do_in_chroot_2 (int (*cb)(const char *, int))
VERIFY (WIFEXITED (status));
int ret = WEXITSTATUS (status);
if (ret != 0)
- return ret;
+ FAIL_UNSUPPORTED ("unable to mount /proc on inner child process");
- /* set 'pid' to the inner child */
- VERIFY (read (pid_pipe[0], &pid, sizeof pid) == sizeof pid);
xclose (pid_pipe[0]);
- /* wait for the inner child */
- xwaitpid (pid, &status, 0);
- VERIFY (WIFEXITED (status));
- xclose (master);
- return WEXITSTATUS (status);
+ return 0;
}
static int