[v2,4/5] gdb: introduce ability to disable frame unwinders

Message ID 20240408201915.1482831-5-blarsen@redhat.com
State New
Headers
Series Modernize frame unwinders and add disable feature |

Checks

Context Check Description
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_build--master-aarch64 success Testing passed
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_build--master-arm success Testing passed
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm fail Testing failed
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64 success Testing passed

Commit Message

Guinevere Larsen April 8, 2024, 8:19 p.m. UTC
  Sometimes, in the GDB testsuite, we want to test the ability of specific
unwinders to handle some piece of code. Usually this is done by trying
to outsmart GDB, or by coercing the compiler to remove information that
GDB would rely on.  Both approaches have problems as GDB gets smarter
with time, and that compilers might differ in version and behavior, or
simply introduce new useful information. This was requested back in 2003
in PR backtrace/8434.

To improve our ability to thoroughly test GDB, this patch introduces a
new maintenance command that allows a user to disable some unwinders,
based on either the name of the unwinder or on its class. With this
change, it will now be possible for GDB to not find any frame unwinders
for a given frame, which would previously cause GDB to assert. GDB will
now check if any frame unwinder has been disabled, and if some has, it
will just error out instead of asserting.

Unwinders can be disabled or re-enabled in 3 different ways:
* Disabling/enabling all at once (using '-all').
* By specifying an unwinder class to be disabled (option '-class').
* By specifying the name of an unwinder (option '-name').

If you give no options to the command, GDB assumes the input is an
unwinder class. '-class' would make no difference if used, is just here
for completeness.

This command is meant to be used once the inferior is already at the
desired location for the test. An example session would be:

(gdb) start
Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at omp.c:17
17          func();
(gdb) maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH
(gdb) bt
\#0  main () at omp.c:17
(gdb) maint frame-unwinder enable ARCH
(gdb) cont
Continuing.

Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8434
---
 gdb/NEWS                                      |   7 +
 gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo                           |  24 +++
 gdb/frame-unwind.c                            | 154 +++++++++++++++++-
 gdb/frame-unwind.h                            |  13 ++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.c |  21 +++
 .../gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.exp         | 114 +++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.c
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.exp
  

Comments

Eli Zaretskii April 9, 2024, 2:47 a.m. UTC | #1
> From: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
> Cc: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon,  8 Apr 2024 17:19:14 -0300
> 
> Sometimes, in the GDB testsuite, we want to test the ability of specific
> unwinders to handle some piece of code. Usually this is done by trying
> to outsmart GDB, or by coercing the compiler to remove information that
> GDB would rely on.  Both approaches have problems as GDB gets smarter
> with time, and that compilers might differ in version and behavior, or
> simply introduce new useful information. This was requested back in 2003
> in PR backtrace/8434.
> 
> To improve our ability to thoroughly test GDB, this patch introduces a
> new maintenance command that allows a user to disable some unwinders,
> based on either the name of the unwinder or on its class. With this
> change, it will now be possible for GDB to not find any frame unwinders
> for a given frame, which would previously cause GDB to assert. GDB will
> now check if any frame unwinder has been disabled, and if some has, it
> will just error out instead of asserting.
> 
> Unwinders can be disabled or re-enabled in 3 different ways:
> * Disabling/enabling all at once (using '-all').
> * By specifying an unwinder class to be disabled (option '-class').
> * By specifying the name of an unwinder (option '-name').
> 
> If you give no options to the command, GDB assumes the input is an
> unwinder class. '-class' would make no difference if used, is just here
> for completeness.
> 
> This command is meant to be used once the inferior is already at the
> desired location for the test. An example session would be:
> 
> (gdb) start
> Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at omp.c:17
> 17          func();
> (gdb) maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH
> (gdb) bt
> \#0  main () at omp.c:17
> (gdb) maint frame-unwinder enable ARCH
> (gdb) cont
> Continuing.
> 
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8434
> ---
>  gdb/NEWS                                      |   7 +
>  gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo                           |  24 +++
>  gdb/frame-unwind.c                            | 154 +++++++++++++++++-
>  gdb/frame-unwind.h                            |  13 ++
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.c |  21 +++
>  .../gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.exp         | 114 +++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.c
>  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.exp

Thanks.

> --- a/gdb/NEWS
> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> @@ -54,6 +54,13 @@ disable missing-debug-handler LOCUS HANDLER
>  maintenance info linux-lwps
>    List all LWPs under control of the linux-nat target.
>  
> +maintenance frame-unwinder disable [-all | -name NAME | [-class] CLASS]
> +maintenance frame-unwinder enable [-all | -name NAME | [-class] CLASS]
> +  Enable or disable frame unwinders.  This is only meant to be used when
> +  testing unwinders themselves, and you want to ensure that a fallback
> +  algorithm won't obscure a regression.  GDB is not expected to behave
> +  well if you try to execute the inferior with unwinders disabled.

This part is OK.

> --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> @@ -42022,6 +42022,30 @@ architecture, then enabling this flag does not cause them to be used.
>  @item maint info frame-unwinders
>  List the frame unwinders currently in effect, starting with the highest priority.
>  
> +@kindex maint frame-unwinder disable
> +@kindex maint frame-unwinder enable
> +@item maint frame-unwinder disable [@code{-all} | @code{-name} @var{NAME} | [@code{-class}] @var{CLASS}]
> +@item maint frame-unwinder enable [@code{-all} | @code{-name} @var{NAME} | [@code{-class}] @var{CLASS}]

The symbols in @var should be in lower-case (they will be up-cased in
the Info output, but in HTML and printed output they will be in
italics instead).

> +Disable or enable frame unwinders.  This is meant only as a testing tool, and
> +@value{GDBN} is not guaranteed to work properly if it is unable to find
> +valid frame unwinders.
> +
> +The meaning of each of the invocations are as follows:
> +
> +@table @samp
> +@item @code{-all}
> +Disable or enable all unwinders.
> +@item @code{-name} @var{NAME}
> +@var{NAME} is the exact name of the unwinder to be disabled or enabled.
> +@item [@code{-class}] @var{CLASS}
> +@var{CLASS} is the class of frame unwinders to be disabled or enabled.
> +The class may include the prefix @code{FRAME_UNWINDER_}, but it is not
> +required.
> +@end table
> +
> +@var{NAME} and @var{CLASS} are always case insensitive.  If no option
> +starting wth @code{-} is given, @value{GDBN} assumes @code{-class}.

I think this command should be moved to after "maint info
frame-unwinders", and it should say that the list of available
unwinders is shown by that command.  Also, I suppose what you call
"class" is what "maint info frame-unwinders" displays as "Type"?  Or
is it something else?  If the latter, the manual should tell how to
know which classes are available.
> +  add_cmd ("disable", class_maintenance, maintenance_disable_frame_unwinders,
> +	   _("\
> +Disable one or more frame unwinder(s).\n\
> +Usage: maint frame-unwinder disable [-all | -name NAME | [-class] CLASS]\n\
> +\n\
> +These are the meanings of the options:\n\
> +\t-all    - All available unwinders will be disabled\n\
> +\t-name   - NAME is the exact name of the frame unwinder is to be disabled\n\
                                                            ^^
That "is" should be removed.

> +  add_cmd ("enable", class_maintenance, maintenance_enable_frame_unwinders,
> +	   _("\
> +Enable one or more frame unwinder(s).\n\
> +Usage: maint frame-unwinder enable [-all | -name NAME | [-class] CLASS]\n\
> +\n\
> +These are the meanings of the options:\n\
> +\t-all    - All available unwinders will be enabled\n\
> +\t-name   - NAME is the exact name of the frame unwinder is to be enabled\n\

Likewise here.

Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
  
Guinevere Larsen April 9, 2024, 1:33 p.m. UTC | #2
Thanks for the review. I'll fix everything else you mentioned.

On 4/8/24 23:47, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> +Disable or enable frame unwinders.  This is meant only as a testing tool, and
>> +@value{GDBN} is not guaranteed to work properly if it is unable to find
>> +valid frame unwinders.
>> +
>> +The meaning of each of the invocations are as follows:
>> +
>> +@table @samp
>> +@item @code{-all}
>> +Disable or enable all unwinders.
>> +@item @code{-name} @var{NAME}
>> +@var{NAME} is the exact name of the unwinder to be disabled or enabled.
>> +@item [@code{-class}] @var{CLASS}
>> +@var{CLASS} is the class of frame unwinders to be disabled or enabled.
>> +The class may include the prefix @code{FRAME_UNWINDER_}, but it is not
>> +required.
>> +@end table
>> +
>> +@var{NAME} and @var{CLASS} are always case insensitive.  If no option
>> +starting wth @code{-} is given, @value{GDBN} assumes @code{-class}.
> I think this command should be moved to after "maint info
> frame-unwinders", and it should say that the list of available
> unwinders is shown by that command.  Also, I suppose what you call
> "class" is what "maint info frame-unwinders" displays as "Type"?  Or
> is it something else?  If the latter, the manual should tell how to
> know which classes are available.

The unwinder class was introduced by patch 2 of this series (which I now 
realize I forgot to add NEWS and doc changes). Where would I add base 
information about frame unwinders like this?
  
Eli Zaretskii April 9, 2024, 2:08 p.m. UTC | #3
> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:33:50 -0300
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Guinevere Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
> 
> I think this command should be moved to after "maint info
> frame-unwinders", and it should say that the list of available
> unwinders is shown by that command.  Also, I suppose what you call
> "class" is what "maint info frame-unwinders" displays as "Type"?  Or
> is it something else?  If the latter, the manual should tell how to
> know which classes are available.
> 
> The unwinder class was introduced by patch 2 of this series (which I now realize I forgot to add NEWS and doc
> changes). Where would I add base information about frame unwinders like this?

I think right before the description of the command itself.
  

Patch

diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
index feb3a37393a..da83db81112 100644
--- a/gdb/NEWS
+++ b/gdb/NEWS
@@ -54,6 +54,13 @@  disable missing-debug-handler LOCUS HANDLER
 maintenance info linux-lwps
   List all LWPs under control of the linux-nat target.
 
+maintenance frame-unwinder disable [-all | -name NAME | [-class] CLASS]
+maintenance frame-unwinder enable [-all | -name NAME | [-class] CLASS]
+  Enable or disable frame unwinders.  This is only meant to be used when
+  testing unwinders themselves, and you want to ensure that a fallback
+  algorithm won't obscure a regression.  GDB is not expected to behave
+  well if you try to execute the inferior with unwinders disabled.
+
 set remote thread-options-packet
 show remote thread-options-packet
   Set/show the use of the thread options packet.
diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
index 727f9275bfb..2921f2007ab 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -42022,6 +42022,30 @@  architecture, then enabling this flag does not cause them to be used.
 @item maint info frame-unwinders
 List the frame unwinders currently in effect, starting with the highest priority.
 
+@kindex maint frame-unwinder disable
+@kindex maint frame-unwinder enable
+@item maint frame-unwinder disable [@code{-all} | @code{-name} @var{NAME} | [@code{-class}] @var{CLASS}]
+@item maint frame-unwinder enable [@code{-all} | @code{-name} @var{NAME} | [@code{-class}] @var{CLASS}]
+Disable or enable frame unwinders.  This is meant only as a testing tool, and
+@value{GDBN} is not guaranteed to work properly if it is unable to find
+valid frame unwinders.
+
+The meaning of each of the invocations are as follows:
+
+@table @samp
+@item @code{-all}
+Disable or enable all unwinders.
+@item @code{-name} @var{NAME}
+@var{NAME} is the exact name of the unwinder to be disabled or enabled.
+@item [@code{-class}] @var{CLASS}
+@var{CLASS} is the class of frame unwinders to be disabled or enabled.
+The class may include the prefix @code{FRAME_UNWINDER_}, but it is not
+required.
+@end table
+
+@var{NAME} and @var{CLASS} are always case insensitive.  If no option
+starting wth @code{-} is given, @value{GDBN} assumes @code{-class}.
+
 @kindex maint set worker-threads
 @kindex maint show worker-threads
 @item maint set worker-threads
diff --git a/gdb/frame-unwind.c b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
index fd3d3b378ab..0806770f5a3 100644
--- a/gdb/frame-unwind.c
+++ b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
@@ -87,6 +87,23 @@  frame_unwinder_class_str (frame_unwind_class uclass)
   return location->second;
 }
 
+/* Case insensitive search for a frame_unwind_class based on the given
+   string.  */
+static enum frame_unwind_class
+str_to_frame_unwind_class (const char *class_str)
+{
+  const char *prefix = "FRAME_UNWIND_";
+  /* Skip the prefix if present.  */
+  if (strncasecmp (class_str, prefix, strlen(prefix)) == 0)
+    class_str += strlen(prefix);
+  for (const auto& it : unwind_class_conversion)
+    {
+      if (strcasecmp(it.second, class_str) == 0)
+	return it.first;
+    }
+  error (_("Unknown frame unwind class: %s"), class_str);
+}
+
 void
 frame_unwind_prepend_unwinder (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
 				const struct frame_unwind *unwinder)
@@ -184,25 +201,47 @@  frame_unwind_find_by_frame (const frame_info_ptr &this_frame, void **this_cache)
 
   const struct frame_unwind *unwinder_from_target;
 
+  /* If we see a disabled unwinder, we assume some test is being run on
+     GDB, and we don't want to assert at the end of this function.  */
+  bool seen_disabled_unwinder = false;
+
   unwinder_from_target = target_get_unwinder ();
   if (unwinder_from_target != NULL
+      && unwinder_from_target->enabled ()
       && frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache,
 				   unwinder_from_target))
     return;
+  else if (unwinder_from_target != nullptr
+	   && !unwinder_from_target->enabled ())
+    seen_disabled_unwinder = true;
 
   unwinder_from_target = target_get_tailcall_unwinder ();
   if (unwinder_from_target != NULL
+      && unwinder_from_target->enabled ()
       && frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache,
 				   unwinder_from_target))
     return;
+  else if (unwinder_from_target != nullptr
+	   && !unwinder_from_target->enabled ())
+    seen_disabled_unwinder |= true;
 
   struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
   std::vector<const frame_unwind*> table = get_frame_unwind_table (gdbarch);
   for (auto unwinder: table)
-    if (frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache, unwinder))
-      return;
+    {
+      if (!unwinder->enabled ())
+	{
+	  seen_disabled_unwinder |= true;
+	  continue;
+	}
+      if (frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache, unwinder))
+	return;
+    }
 
-  internal_error (_("frame_unwind_find_by_frame failed"));
+  if (seen_disabled_unwinder)
+    error (_("frame_unwind_find_by_frame failed"));
+  else
+    internal_error (_("frame_unwind_find_by_frame failed"));
 }
 
 /* A default frame sniffer which always accepts the frame.  Used by
@@ -396,10 +435,11 @@  maintenance_info_frame_unwinders (const char *args, int from_tty)
   std::vector<const frame_unwind*> table = get_frame_unwind_table (gdbarch);
 
   ui_out *uiout = current_uiout;
-  ui_out_emit_table table_emitter (uiout, 3, -1, "FrameUnwinders");
+  ui_out_emit_table table_emitter (uiout, 4, -1, "FrameUnwinders");
   uiout->table_header (27, ui_left, "name", "Name");
   uiout->table_header (25, ui_left, "type", "Type");
   uiout->table_header (9, ui_left, "class", "Class");
+  uiout->table_header (8, ui_left, "enabled", "Enabled");
   uiout->table_body ();
 
   for (const struct frame_unwind* unwinder: table)
@@ -407,15 +447,88 @@  maintenance_info_frame_unwinders (const char *args, int from_tty)
       const char *name = unwinder->name ();
       const char *type = frame_type_str (unwinder->type ());
       const char *uclass = frame_unwinder_class_str (unwinder->unwinder_class ());
+      const char *enabled = (unwinder->enabled ()) ? "Y" : "N";
 
       ui_out_emit_list tuple_emitter (uiout, nullptr);
       uiout->field_string ("name", name);
       uiout->field_string ("type", type);
       uiout->field_string ("class", uclass);
+      uiout->field_string ("enabled", enabled);
       uiout->text ("\n");
     }
 }
 
+/* Helper function to both enable and disable frame unwinders.
+   if ENABLE is true, this call will be enabling unwinders,
+   otherwise the unwinders will be disabled.  */
+static void
+enable_disable_frame_unwinders (const char *args, int from_tty, bool enable)
+{
+  reinit_frame_cache ();
+  if (args == nullptr)
+    error (_("specify which frame unwinder(s) should be %s"),
+	   (enable)? "enabled" : "disabled");
+  struct gdbarch* gdbarch = current_inferior ()->arch ();
+  std::vector<const frame_unwind *> unwinder_list
+    = gdbarch_get_unwinder_list (gdbarch);
+
+  /* First see if the user wants to change all unwinders.  */
+  if (check_for_argument (&args, "-all"))
+    {
+      for (const frame_unwind *u : unwinder_list)
+	u->set_enabled (enable);
+      return;
+    }
+
+  /* If user entered a specific unwinder name, handle it here.  If the
+     unwinder is already at the expected state, error out.  */
+  if (check_for_argument (&args, "-name"))
+    {
+      bool did_something = false;
+      for (const frame_unwind *unwinder : unwinder_list)
+	{
+	  if (strcasecmp (unwinder->name (), args) == 0)
+	    {
+	      if (unwinder->enabled () == enable)
+		error (_("unwinder %s is already %s"),
+			 unwinder->name (),
+			 (unwinder->enabled ()) ? ("enabled") : ("disabled"));
+	      unwinder->set_enabled (enable);
+
+	      did_something = true;
+	      break;
+	    }
+	}
+      if (!did_something)
+	error (_("couldn't find unwinder named %s"),args);
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      /* Discard '-class' argument, if provided.  */
+      check_for_argument (&args, "-class");
+      enum frame_unwind_class dclass = str_to_frame_unwind_class (args);
+      for (auto unwinder: unwinder_list)
+	{
+	  if (unwinder->unwinder_class () == dclass)
+	    unwinder->set_enabled (enable);
+	}
+    }
+}
+
+/* Implement "maint frame-unwinders disable" command.  */
+static void
+maintenance_disable_frame_unwinders (const char *args, int from_tty)
+{
+  enable_disable_frame_unwinders (args, from_tty, false);
+}
+
+/* Implement "maint frame-unwinders disable" command.  */
+static void
+maintenance_enable_frame_unwinders (const char *args, int from_tty)
+{
+  enable_disable_frame_unwinders (args, from_tty, true);
+}
+
 void _initialize_frame_unwind ();
 void
 _initialize_frame_unwind ()
@@ -427,4 +540,37 @@  _initialize_frame_unwind ()
 	   _("List the frame unwinders currently in effect, "
 	     "starting with the highest priority."),
 	   &maintenanceinfolist);
+
+  /* Add "maint frame-unwinder disable/enable".  */
+  static struct cmd_list_element *maint_frame_unwinder;
+
+  add_basic_prefix_cmd ("frame-unwinder", class_maintenance,
+			_("Commands handling frame unwinders."),
+			&maint_frame_unwinder, 0, &maintenancelist);
+
+  add_cmd ("disable", class_maintenance, maintenance_disable_frame_unwinders,
+	   _("\
+Disable one or more frame unwinder(s).\n\
+Usage: maint frame-unwinder disable [-all | -name NAME | [-class] CLASS]\n\
+\n\
+These are the meanings of the options:\n\
+\t-all    - All available unwinders will be disabled\n\
+\t-name   - NAME is the exact name of the frame unwinder is to be disabled\n\
+\t-class  - CLASS is the class of unwinders to be disabled.\n\
+\n\
+UNWINDER and NAME are case insensitive."),
+	   & maint_frame_unwinder);
+
+  add_cmd ("enable", class_maintenance, maintenance_enable_frame_unwinders,
+	   _("\
+Enable one or more frame unwinder(s).\n\
+Usage: maint frame-unwinder enable [-all | -name NAME | [-class] CLASS]\n\
+\n\
+These are the meanings of the options:\n\
+\t-all    - All available unwinders will be enabled\n\
+\t-name   - NAME is the exact name of the frame unwinder is to be enabled\n\
+\t-class  - CLASS is the class of unwinders to be enabled.\n\
+\n\
+UNWINDER and NAME are case insensitive."),
+	   & maint_frame_unwinder);
 }
diff --git a/gdb/frame-unwind.h b/gdb/frame-unwind.h
index 62da34b6ee8..ffb131310dc 100644
--- a/gdb/frame-unwind.h
+++ b/gdb/frame-unwind.h
@@ -180,6 +180,9 @@  class frame_unwind
      unwinding.  */
   enum frame_unwind_class m_unwinder_class;
   const struct frame_data *m_unwind_data;
+
+  /* Whether this unwinder can be used when sniffing.  */
+  mutable bool m_enabled = true;
 public:
   frame_unwind (const char *name, frame_type type, frame_unwind_class uclass,
 		       const struct frame_data *data)
@@ -207,6 +210,16 @@  class frame_unwind
     return m_unwind_data;
   }
 
+  bool enabled () const
+  {
+    return m_enabled;
+  }
+
+  void set_enabled (bool state) const
+  {
+    m_enabled = state;
+  }
+
   /* Default stop_reason function.  It reports NO_REASON, unless the
      frame is the outermost.  */
   virtual enum unwind_stop_reason stop_reason (const frame_info_ptr &this_frame,
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..078517c011e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ 
+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+   Copyright 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+   (at your option) any later version.
+
+   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+   GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+   along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+int main ()
+{
+    return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.exp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4efc87ccfcf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/frame-unwind-disable.exp
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ 
+# Copyright 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+# Test multiple situations in which we may use the maintenance command to
+# disable and enable frame unwinders, and check that they really are
+# disabled when they say the are.
+
+standard_testfile .c
+
+# Proc to check if the unwinder of the given name is in the desired state.
+# STATE can be either Y or N.
+proc check_unwinder_state { unwinder_name state {testname ""} } {
+    if {${testname} == ""} {
+	set testname "checking state ${state} for ${unwinder_name}"
+    }
+    gdb_test "maint info frame-unwinders" \
+	".*${unwinder_name}\\s+\\w+\\s+\\w+.+${state}.*" \
+	"${testname}"
+}
+
+proc check_unwinder_class { unwinder_class state {testname ""} } {
+    set should_pass true
+    if {$testname == ""} {
+	set testname "checking if $unwinder_class state is $state"
+    }
+    gdb_test_multiple "maint info frame-unwinders" "collect for $testname" -lbl {
+	-re "^\\w+\\s+\\w+\\s+${unwinder_class}\\s+\(.\)\\s+" {
+	    set cur_state $expec_out(1, string)
+	    if {$cur_state != $state} {
+		set should_pass false
+	    }
+	    exp_continue
+	}
+	-re "${::gdb_prompt} $" {
+	    pass $gdb_test_name
+	}
+    }
+
+    gdb_assert {$should_pass == true} "$testname"
+}
+
+if {[prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} ${srcfile} ]} {
+    return -1
+}
+
+if {![runto_main]} {
+    untested "couldn't run to main"
+    return
+}
+
+# Test disabling all unwinders
+check_unwinder_class "FRAME_UNWIND_\\w+" "Y" \
+    "Checking all unwinders before any changes"
+gdb_test_no_output "maint frame-unwinder disable -all"
+check_unwinder_class "FRAME_UNWIND_\\w+" "N" \
+    "Checking all unwinders were properly disabled"
+
+# Test if GDB can still make a backtrace once all unwinders are disabled.
+# It should be impossible.
+gdb_test "backtrace" ".*frame_unwind_find_by_frame failed.*" \
+    "confirm that no suitable unwinders are found"
+
+# Reenable all unwinders
+gdb_test_no_output "maint frame-unwinder enable -all"
+check_unwinder_class "FRAME_UNWIND_\\w+" "Y" \
+    "Checking all unwinders after re-enabling them all"
+
+# Check that we are able to get backtraces once again.
+gdb_test "backtrace" ".0\\s+main .. at.*" \
+    "confirm we now get usable backtraces"
+
+# Check if we can disable an unwinder based on the name.
+check_unwinder_state "dummy" "Y"
+gdb_test_no_output "maint frame-unwinder disable -name dummy"
+check_unwinder_state "dummy" "N"
+# And verify what happens if you try to disable it again.
+gdb_test "maint frame-unwinder disable -name dummy" \
+    "unwinder dummy is already disabled" \
+    "disable already disabled unwinder"
+check_unwinder_state "dummy" "N" "check if dummy continues disabled"
+
+foreach class {GDB ARCH DEBUGINFO EXTENSION} {
+    # Disable all unwinders of type CLASS, and check that the command worked.
+    gdb_test_no_output "maint frame-unwinder disable ${class}"
+    check_unwinder_class "FRAME_UNWINDER_${class}" "N"
+}
+
+# Now check if we are able to enable a single unwinder, and what happens if we
+# enable it twice.
+gdb_test_no_output "maint frame-unwinder enable -name dummy"
+check_unwinder_state "dummy" "Y" "successfully enabled dummy unwinder"
+gdb_test "maint frame-unwinder enable -name dummy" \
+    "unwinder dummy is already enabled" \
+    "enable already enabled unwinder"
+check_unwinder_state "dummy" "Y" "check if dummy continues enabled"
+
+foreach class {GDB ARCH DEBUGINFO EXTENSION} {
+    # Enable all unwinders of type CLASS, and check that the command worked.
+    # using "-class" option to ensure it works.  Should make no difference.
+    gdb_test_no_output "maint frame-unwinder enable -class ${class}"
+    check_unwinder_class "FRAME_UNWINDER_${class}" "Y"
+}