[gdb/symtab] Fix gdb-index writing for .debug_types

Message ID 20230907144233.14505-2-tdevries@suse.de
State Committed
Headers
Series [gdb/symtab] Fix gdb-index writing for .debug_types |

Checks

Context Check Description
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64 success Testing passed
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm success Testing passed
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_build--master-arm warning Patch is already merged
linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gdb_build--master-aarch64 warning Patch is already merged

Commit Message

Tom de Vries Sept. 7, 2023, 2:42 p.m. UTC
  With test-case gdb.ada/same_enum.exp and target board dwarf4-gdb-index we run
into:
...
(gdb) print red^M
No definition of "red" in current context.^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/same_enum.exp: print red
...

[ This is a regression since commit 844a72efbce ("Simplify gdb_index writing"),
so this is broken in gdb 12 and 13. ]

The easiest way to see what's going wrong is with readelf.  We have in section
.gdb_index:
...
[7194] pck__red:
        2 [static, variable]
        3 [static, variable]
...
which points to the CUs 2 and 3 in the CU list (shown using "2" and "3"), but
should be pointing to the TUs 2 and 3 in the TU list (shown using "T2" and
"T3").

Fix this by removing the counter / types_counter distinction in
write_gdbindex, such that we get the expected:
...
[7194] pck__red:
        T2 [static, variable]
        T3 [static, variable]
...

[ While reading write_gdbindex I noticed a few oddities related to dwz
handling, I've filed PR30829 about this. ]

Tested on x86_64-linux.

PR symtab/30827
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30827
---
 gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Tom Tromey Sept. 7, 2023, 6:42 p.m. UTC | #1
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

Tom> Fix this by removing the counter / types_counter distinction in
Tom> write_gdbindex, such that we get the expected:
Tom> ...
Tom> [7194] pck__red:
Tom>         T2 [static, variable]
Tom>         T3 [static, variable]
Tom> ...

Tom> [ While reading write_gdbindex I noticed a few oddities related to dwz
Tom> handling, I've filed PR30829 about this. ]

Tom> Tested on x86_64-linux.

Ok.  Thank you.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>

Tom
  

Patch

diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c b/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
index e178bb067a9..11f254e263a 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c
@@ -1201,18 +1201,14 @@  write_gdbindex (dwarf2_per_bfd *per_bfd, cooked_index *table,
   data_buf types_cu_list;
 
   /* The CU list is already sorted, so we don't need to do additional
-     work here.  Also, the debug_types entries do not appear in
-     all_units, but only in their own hash table.  */
+     work here.  */
 
   int counter = 0;
-  int types_counter = 0;
   for (int i = 0; i < per_bfd->all_units.size (); ++i)
     {
       dwarf2_per_cu_data *per_cu = per_bfd->all_units[i].get ();
 
-      int &this_counter = per_cu->is_debug_types ? types_counter : counter;
-
-      const auto insertpair = cu_index_htab.emplace (per_cu, this_counter);
+      const auto insertpair = cu_index_htab.emplace (per_cu, counter);
       gdb_assert (insertpair.second);
 
       /* The all_units list contains CUs read from the objfile as well as
@@ -1234,7 +1230,7 @@  write_gdbindex (dwarf2_per_bfd *per_bfd, cooked_index *table,
       else
 	cu_list.append_uint (8, BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE, per_cu->length ());
 
-      ++this_counter;
+      ++counter;
     }
 
   write_cooked_index (table, cu_index_htab, &symtab);