[pushed] gdb/testsuite: use a more unique name in gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp
Commit Message
I see failures in this test, due to the function name "add" being too
generic, and unexpected breakpoint locations being found in my
libstdc++, such as (wrapped for readability):
{
number="2.4",enabled="y",addr="0x00007ffff7d67e68",
func="(anonymous namespace)::fast_float::bigint::add",
file="/usr/src/debug/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fast_float/fast_float.h",
fullname="/usr/src/debug/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fast_float/fast_float.h",
line="1815", thread-groups=["i1"]
}
Change the test to use a more unique name.
Change-Id: I91de781be62d246eb41c73eaa410ebdd12633d1d
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.cc | 8 ++++----
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
base-commit: b7096df235486ce718c2a0bfda8a0db074dcb671
@@ -16,13 +16,13 @@
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
static int
-add (int a, int b)
+a_very_unique_name (int a, int b)
{
return a + b;
}
static double
-add (double a, double b)
+a_very_unique_name (double a, double b)
{
return a + b;
}
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ add (double a, double b)
int
main (void)
{
- int i = add (3, 4);
- double d = add (3.0, 4.0);
+ int i = a_very_unique_name (3, 4);
+ double d = a_very_unique_name (3.0, 4.0);
return 1;
}
@@ -67,12 +67,12 @@ proc do_test { mi_version use_fix_flag expect_fixed_output } {
# Check the breakpoint-created event.
set pattern [make_breakpoints_pattern $expect_fixed_output 2 y y]
- mi_gdb_test "break add" \
- [multi_line "&\"break add\\\\n\"" \
+ mi_gdb_test "break a_very_unique_name" \
+ [multi_line "&\"break a_very_unique_name\\\\n\"" \
"~\"Breakpoint ${decimal} at.*\\(2 locations\\)\\\\n\"" \
"=breakpoint-created,${pattern}" \
"\\^done" ] \
- "break add"
+ "break a_very_unique_name"
# Check the -break-info output.
mi_gdb_test "-break-info" \
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ proc do_test { mi_version use_fix_flag expect_fixed_output } {
# Check the -break-insert response.
set pattern [make_breakpoints_pattern $expect_fixed_output 3 y y]
- mi_gdb_test "-break-insert add" "\\^done,${pattern}" "insert breakpoint with MI command"
+ mi_gdb_test "-break-insert a_very_unique_name" "\\^done,${pattern}" "insert breakpoint with MI command"
# Modify enableness through MI commands shouldn't trigger MI
# notification.