[06/24] Don't rely on inferior I/O in gdb.base/restore.exp

Message ID 1429639711-16459-7-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com
State New, archived
Headers

Commit Message

Pedro Alves April 21, 2015, 6:08 p.m. UTC
  There seems to be no point in relying on stdio here.  Simply use
gdb_continue_to_end instead.

(not removing the printf calls, as the .c file is half generated.)

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-21  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	* gdb.base/restore.exp (restore_tests): Use gdb_continue_to_end.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/restore.exp | 15 +--------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
  

Patch

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/restore.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/restore.exp
index a02ba4f..bd9dfbf 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/restore.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/restore.exp
@@ -79,20 +79,7 @@  proc restore_tests { } {
         }
     }
 
-    if ![gdb_skip_stdio_test "run to completion"] {
-	send_gdb "continue\n"
-
-	gdb_expect {
-	    -re "exiting" {
-		pass "run to completion"
-	    }
-	    timeout { 
-		fail "(timeout) run to completion"
-	    }
-	}
-    } else {
-	gdb_test "continue" ".*" ""
-    }
+    gdb_continue_to_end "" continue 1
 }
 
 set prev_timeout $timeout