Patchwork [review,v2] Clarify purpose of assert in _dl_lookup_symbol_x

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Simon Marchi (Code Review)
Date Nov. 12, 2019, 12:51 p.m.
Message ID <20191112125116.CA12F20AF6@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/35825/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Simon Marchi (Code Review) - Nov. 12, 2019, 12:51 p.m.
Change URL: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/glibc/+/469
......................................................................

Clarify purpose of assert in _dl_lookup_symbol_x

Only one of the currently defined flags is incompatible with versioned
symbol lookups, so it makes sense to check for that flag and not its
complement.

Reviewed-by: Gabriel F. T. Gomes <gabrielftg@linux.ibm.com>
Change-Id: I3384349cef90cfd91862ebc34a4053f0c0a99404
---
M elf/dl-lookup.c
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/elf/dl-lookup.c b/elf/dl-lookup.c
index fd44cd4..aaaf437 100644
--- a/elf/dl-lookup.c
+++ b/elf/dl-lookup.c
@@ -792,11 +792,9 @@ 
 
   bump_num_relocations ();
 
-  /* No other flag than DL_LOOKUP_ADD_DEPENDENCY or DL_LOOKUP_GSCOPE_LOCK
-     is allowed if we look up a versioned symbol.  */
-  assert (version == NULL
-	  || (flags & ~(DL_LOOKUP_ADD_DEPENDENCY | DL_LOOKUP_GSCOPE_LOCK))
-	     == 0);
+  /* DL_LOOKUP_RETURN_NEWEST does not make sense for versioned
+     lookups.  */
+  assert (version == NULL || !(flags & DL_LOOKUP_RETURN_NEWEST));
 
   size_t i = 0;
   if (__glibc_unlikely (skip_map != NULL))