From patchwork Wed May 18 07:07:21 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Prathamesh Kulkarni X-Patchwork-Id: 54120 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6636E3858016 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 07:09:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6636E3858016 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1652857754; bh=y9QVKLNdj9BaZn0yr0Zu07uiyNy7hLQCrq3z/1J/jBo=; h=Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:From; b=qxAQ2sLZUaYvSRFNMF2WOQlL6y/bYfEUCiW2nbu3DDDM/lNF0QZXiZ/p9xTDK3dmG tyt+jA3M+ujzhc7KjoXXWzyugZqS6KxukIKxyhQ/t3AG+Ytnv/uoro8DdcjLICNR6m BmsLcIprU4YTnwPdCuogYapscrnOPSCghhiHz7uo= X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BB333857C50 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 07:07:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6BB333857C50 Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id eg11so1733518edb.11 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 00:07:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=y9QVKLNdj9BaZn0yr0Zu07uiyNy7hLQCrq3z/1J/jBo=; b=U23QPyX+klZwb8/V1su6fQR0hKuz1Y+WLmcO344qeuMFA9S6sCa9S35xP9iY5UBzDq CchnO89GiQN9b4dKNH94ZJixnUNYyizuAurb3pgaJD3gc5NGXmhhLusr6eEhQcG0izbd m21ENgXlRWtK66skXTVBWRrYaYJ7mchIjRHGrTZjEtzsndXDq+iw6REFH9OrdjTirtFo WVUnHwFcthWpaKj7C3a4/diosHbcl5vEeIPixJevamAnw8p7GPehTB3GBfkDrfbXC96x ehnVIVIB4o7pdfsXXqq6oB9f8O5OmlRAztwVZVK3LjZlzt1CBH2ikg6N90WrSnHv8cDL YvFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531z604I9NSGUT80kk/EVnhLn2nC31Ojwj+Y5qDxWxXU5KSA2HpE ABnPs4zpPlBpFVqmlW57ddbbiaBQ0hArpY8WsvMkNmAH2qAkiQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLC5Z7Nm8x8DbWQtSyppn3N1Bb+aCY46gDxpbIwT4YQhvCv5A9eDOIeXm0wCkIJNu8yDhc8ODMicWyx3dVZC0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:176b:b0:42a:a828:5d79 with SMTP id da11-20020a056402176b00b0042aa8285d79mr18456705edb.272.1652857677232; Wed, 18 May 2022 00:07:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 12:37:21 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: [1/9] AArch64 changes to adjust vec_perm_const hook To: gcc Patches , Richard Sandiford X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches From: Prathamesh Kulkarni Reply-To: Prathamesh Kulkarni Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" Hi, The attached patch adjusts vec_perm_const hook to accommodate the new parameter. For now, it bails out if vmode != op_mode, in follow-up patch to PR96463, I will add dup as exception. Bootstrapped+tested on aarch64-linux-gnu. Does it look OK ? Thanks, Prathamesh diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc index f4d2a800f39..e6a24a0f9e1 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc @@ -24145,9 +24145,13 @@ aarch64_expand_vec_perm_const_1 (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d) /* Implement TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST. */ static bool -aarch64_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, rtx target, rtx op0, - rtx op1, const vec_perm_indices &sel) +aarch64_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, machine_mode op_mode, + rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1, + const vec_perm_indices &sel) { + if (vmode != op_mode) + return false; + struct expand_vec_perm_d d; /* Check whether the mask can be applied to a single vector. */