From patchwork Thu Jun 15 06:16:36 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lulu Cheng X-Patchwork-Id: 71139 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C59385771F for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 06:17:27 +0000 (GMT) X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C423C3858C1F for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 06:17:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C423C3858C1F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loongson.cn Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=loongson.cn Received: from mail.loongson.cn ([114.242.206.163]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q9gI6-0000Um-Db for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 02:17:09 -0400 Received: from loongson.cn (unknown [10.2.5.5]) by gateway (Coremail) with SMTP id _____8Cx+enXrIpkbnMFAA--.11663S3; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:16:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from 5.5.5 (unknown [10.2.5.5]) by localhost.localdomain (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf8BxduTSrIpk+ZYbAA--.12558S2; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:16:54 +0800 (CST) From: Lulu Cheng To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: xry111@xry111.site, i@xen0n.name, xuchenghua@loongson.cn, chenxiaolong Subject: [pushed][PATCH v3] LoongArch: Change the default value of LARCH_CALL_RATIO to 6. Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:16:36 +0800 Message-Id: <20230615061636.3015833-1-chenglulu@loongson.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf8BxduTSrIpk+ZYbAA--.12558S2 X-CM-SenderInfo: xfkh0wpoxo3qxorr0wxvrqhubq/ X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uk129KBj93XoW7tFW7Kr4DAw4Utr15KrWkKrX_yoW8GFW7pr ZIkwnxtr4kGF13Wwn0q3srWw13Ar97GrW7XFsIvr10kFsxGry8XF45KrykXF1UAw4Fq34a vr1rW34avFW0y3cCm3ZEXasCq-sJn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUr529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7KY7ZEXa sCq-sGcSsGvfJ3Ic02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ebIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy29KBjDU 0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9Fb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2 IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48v e4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI 0_Gr0_Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AK xVW8Jr0_Cr1UM2kKe7AKxVWUXVWUAwAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc804VCY07 AIYIkI8VC2zVCFFI0UMc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWU XVWUAwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7V AKI48JMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMxCIbckI1I0E14v2 6r1Y6r17MI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17 CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF 0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIx AIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2 KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU88Ma5UUUUU== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=114.242.206.163; envelope-from=chenglulu@loongson.cn; helo=mail.loongson.cn X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_FAIL, SPF_HELO_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" From: chenxiaolong Pushed r14-1831. During the regression testing of the LoongArch architecture GCC, it was found that the tests in the pr90883.C file failed. The problem was modulated and found that the error was caused by setting the macro LARCH_CALL_RATIO to a too large value. Combined with the actual LoongArch architecture, the different thresholds for meeting the test conditions were tested using the engineering method (SPEC CPU 2006), and the results showed that its optimal threshold should be set to 6. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/loongarch/loongarch.h (LARCH_CALL_RATIO): Modify the value of macro LARCH_CALL_RATIO on LoongArch to make it perform optimally. --- gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.h b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.h index 829acdaa9be..eca723293a1 100644 --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.h +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.h @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ typedef struct { /* The base cost of a memcpy call, for MOVE_RATIO and friends. These values were determined experimentally by benchmarking with CSiBE. */ -#define LARCH_CALL_RATIO 8 +#define LARCH_CALL_RATIO 6 /* Any loop-based implementation of cpymemsi will have at least LARCH_MAX_MOVE_OPS_PER_LOOP_ITER memory-to-memory