Message ID | s9d7ezo3036.fsf@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | Committed |
Headers |
Received: (qmail 40422 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2017 11:36:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-unsubscribe-##L=##H@sourceware.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/> List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org> List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Delivered-To: mailing list libc-alpha@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 39306 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jul 2017 11:36:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-26.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, GIT_PATCH_1, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1278 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 7A6F73A279 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mfabian@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 7A6F73A279 From: Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com> To: Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, pankaj.m@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] For Breton yesstr/nostr locale are missing References: <CGME20170704052709epcas5p1b09aa4825956e6e8d78aa624453e91a0@epcas5p1.samsung.com> <1499145848-20321-1-git-send-email-akhilesh.k@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:36:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1499145848-20321-1-git-send-email-akhilesh.k@samsung.com> (Akhilesh Kumar's message of "Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:54:08 +0530") Message-ID: <s9d7ezo3036.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain |
Commit Message
Mike FABIAN
July 4, 2017, 11:36 a.m. UTC
Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> wrote: > [BZ #21706] > During Locale verification i observed that > yesstr and nostr are missing for Breton [LC_MESSAGES] locale > > Signed-off-by: Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> > --- > localedata/locales/br_FR | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/localedata/locales/br_FR b/localedata/locales/br_FR > index 3444cde..84c52eb 100644 > --- a/localedata/locales/br_FR > +++ b/localedata/locales/br_FR > @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ END LC_CTYPE > LC_MESSAGES > yesexpr "<U005E><U005B><U002B><U0031><U006F><U004F><U0079><U0059><U005D>" > noexpr "<U005E><U005B><U002D><U0030><U006E><U004E><U005D>" > +yesstr "<U0059><U0061>" > +nostr "<U004E><U0061><U006E><U006E>" > END LC_MESSAGES > > LC_MONETARY Decoded, this looks like: "Ya" and "Nann" indeed seem to be the words for "Yes" and "No" in Breton. So this looks correct to me.
Comments
4.07.2017 13:36 Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> wrote: > > > [BZ #21706] > > During Locale verification i observed that > > yesstr and nostr are missing for Breton [LC_MESSAGES] locale > > > > Signed-off-by: Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> > > --- > > localedata/locales/br_FR | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/localedata/locales/br_FR b/localedata/locales/br_FR > > index 3444cde..84c52eb 100644 > > --- a/localedata/locales/br_FR > > +++ b/localedata/locales/br_FR > > @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ END LC_CTYPE > > LC_MESSAGES > > yesexpr "<U005E><U005B><U002B><U0031><U006F><U004F><U0079><U0059><U005D>" > > noexpr "<U005E><U005B><U002D><U0030><U006E><U004E><U005D>" > > +yesstr "<U0059><U0061>" > > +nostr "<U004E><U0061><U006E><U006E>" > > END LC_MESSAGES > > > > LC_MONETARY > [...] > Decoded, this looks like: > > diff --git a/localedata/locales/br_FR b/localedata/locales/br_FR > index 3444cde..84c52eb 100644 > --- a/localedata/locales/br_FR > +++ b/localedata/locales/br_FR > @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ END LC_CTYPE > LC_MESSAGES > yesexpr "^[+1oOyY]" > noexpr "^[-0nN]" > +yesstr "Ya" > +nostr "Nann" > END LC_MESSAGES > > LC_MONETARY > > "Ya" and "Nann" indeed seem to be the words for "Yes" and "No" in > Breton. So this looks correct to me. Akhilesh, where do these strings come from? CLDR (sadly) does not provide them for Breton. Is this correct to always capitalize them? I mean: do the Breton language rules say that "Ya" and "Nann" should always start with the uppercase (so "ya" and "nann" are always incorrect)? See: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16975 Regards, Rafal
Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> さんはかきました: > 4.07.2017 13:36 Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> wrote: >> >> > [BZ #21706] >> > During Locale verification i observed that >> > yesstr and nostr are missing for Breton [LC_MESSAGES] locale >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> >> > --- >> > localedata/locales/br_FR | 2 ++ >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/localedata/locales/br_FR b/localedata/locales/br_FR >> > index 3444cde..84c52eb 100644 >> > --- a/localedata/locales/br_FR >> > +++ b/localedata/locales/br_FR >> > @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ END LC_CTYPE >> > LC_MESSAGES >> > yesexpr "<U005E><U005B><U002B><U0031><U006F><U004F><U0079><U0059><U005D>" >> > noexpr "<U005E><U005B><U002D><U0030><U006E><U004E><U005D>" >> > +yesstr "<U0059><U0061>" >> > +nostr "<U004E><U0061><U006E><U006E>" >> > END LC_MESSAGES >> > >> > LC_MONETARY >> [...] >> Decoded, this looks like: >> >> diff --git a/localedata/locales/br_FR b/localedata/locales/br_FR >> index 3444cde..84c52eb 100644 >> --- a/localedata/locales/br_FR >> +++ b/localedata/locales/br_FR >> @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ END LC_CTYPE >> LC_MESSAGES >> yesexpr "^[+1oOyY]" >> noexpr "^[-0nN]" >> +yesstr "Ya" >> +nostr "Nann" >> END LC_MESSAGES >> >> LC_MONETARY >> >> "Ya" and "Nann" indeed seem to be the words for "Yes" and "No" in >> Breton. So this looks correct to me. > > Akhilesh, where do these strings come from? CLDR (sadly) does not > provide them for Breton. I verified this with online dictionaries for Breton. > Is this correct to always capitalize them? I mean: do the Breton > language rules say that "Ya" and "Nann" should always start with > the uppercase (so "ya" and "nann" are always incorrect)? See: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16975 I don’t know, but I checked the other locales and the capitalization of these strings is unfortunatly inconsistent. I am not sure what to do about that: ~$ LC_ALL=zh_SG.UTF-8 locale -k yesstr yesstr="Yes" ~$ LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 locale -k yesstr yesstr="yes" ~$ > Regards, > > Rafal
5.07.2017 08:30 Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> さんはかきました: > > > 4.07.2017 13:36 Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com> wrote: > >> [...] > >> "Ya" and "Nann" indeed seem to be the words for "Yes" and "No" in > >> Breton. So this looks correct to me. > > > > Akhilesh, where do these strings come from? CLDR (sadly) does not > > provide them for Breton. > > I verified this with online dictionaries for Breton. OK, seems to be credible. > > Is this correct to always capitalize them? I mean: do the Breton > > language rules say that "Ya" and "Nann" should always start with > > the uppercase (so "ya" and "nann" are always incorrect)? See: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16975 > > I don’t know, but I checked the other locales and the capitalization of > these strings is unfortunatly inconsistent. I think that incorrectly used uppercase is a smaller bug than incorrectly used lowercase, and incorrectly used lowercase is a smaller bug than wrong or no translation at all. Also from another mail: 5.07.2017 05:38 AKHILESH KUMAR <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> wrote: > [...] > Rafal, Ya and Nann should Start with uppercase So my suggestion is to leave it as it is. If this is wrong then I hope someone with a better knowledge of Breton language will come to us directly or to CLDR and report the problem. The same about other locales which use the capitalization inconsistently. Regards, Rafal
diff --git a/localedata/locales/br_FR b/localedata/locales/br_FR index 3444cde..84c52eb 100644 --- a/localedata/locales/br_FR +++ b/localedata/locales/br_FR @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ END LC_CTYPE LC_MESSAGES yesexpr "^[+1oOyY]" noexpr "^[-0nN]" +yesstr "Ya" +nostr "Nann" END LC_MESSAGES LC_MONETARY