Update syscall-names.list for 4.15
Commit Message
[Proposed for once the release changes for 2.27, and the post-release
changes opening master for development for 2.28, have been committed.]
This patch updates sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list for
Linux 4.15. There only appears to be one new syscall to add to the
list. (The riscv_flush_icache syscall is *not* added because for
whatever reason it doesn't appear in the uapi asm/unistd.h; only in
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/syscalls.h, which is only included by the
non-uapi asm/unistd.h - and only syscalls whose __NR_* macros are
defined in the uapi asm/unistd.h are relevant for this list.)
Tested for x86_64, and with build-many-glibcs.py.
2018-02-01 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list: Update kernel
version to 4.15.
(s390_sthyi): New syscall.
Comments
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 06:14:06PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> [Proposed for once the release changes for 2.27, and the post-release
> changes opening master for development for 2.28, have been committed.]
>
> This patch updates sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list for
> Linux 4.15. There only appears to be one new syscall to add to the
> list. (The riscv_flush_icache syscall is *not* added because for
> whatever reason it doesn't appear in the uapi asm/unistd.h; only in
> arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/syscalls.h, which is only included by the
> non-uapi asm/unistd.h - and only syscalls whose __NR_* macros are
> defined in the uapi asm/unistd.h are relevant for this list.)
The rationale given in linux commit v4.15-rc8~25^2~2 for defining
__NR_riscv_flush_icache in this unusual location doesn't look convincing.
OK for master.
On Thu, 01 Feb 2018 12:59:06 PST (-0800), ldv@altlinux.org wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 06:14:06PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> [Proposed for once the release changes for 2.27, and the post-release
>> changes opening master for development for 2.28, have been committed.]
>>
>> This patch updates sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list for
>> Linux 4.15. There only appears to be one new syscall to add to the
>> list. (The riscv_flush_icache syscall is *not* added because for
>> whatever reason it doesn't appear in the uapi asm/unistd.h; only in
>> arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/syscalls.h, which is only included by the
>> non-uapi asm/unistd.h - and only syscalls whose __NR_* macros are
>> defined in the uapi asm/unistd.h are relevant for this list.)
>
> The rationale given in linux commit v4.15-rc8~25^2~2 for defining
> __NR_riscv_flush_icache in this unusual location doesn't look convincing.
>
> OK for master.
It's probably just be not knowing what I'm doing. Is it expected that all of
the __NR_ macros end up in unistd.h? If so I can try to figure out how to fix
it in Linux.
Sorry!
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
# names are only used if the installed kernel headers also provide
# them.
-# The list of system calls is current as of Linux 4.14.
-kernel 4.14
+# The list of system calls is current as of Linux 4.15.
+kernel 4.15
FAST_atomic_update
FAST_cmpxchg
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ s390_guarded_storage
s390_pci_mmio_read
s390_pci_mmio_write
s390_runtime_instr
+s390_sthyi
sched_get_affinity
sched_get_priority_max
sched_get_priority_min