Allow _Qp_fgt in sparc64 localplt.data
Checks
Context |
Check |
Description |
dj/TryBot-apply_patch |
success
|
Patch applied to master at the time it was sent
|
dj/TryBot-32bit |
success
|
Build for i686
|
Commit Message
A recent GCC change resulted in localplt test failures on sparc64
because of references to _Qp_fgt. This is analogous to all the other
floating-point symbols allowed in localplt.data, so it seems
appropriate to allow this one as well.
Tested with build-many-glibcs.py for sparc64-linux-gnu (GCC mainline),
where it fixes the test failure.
Comments
* Joseph Myers:
> A recent GCC change resulted in localplt test failures on sparc64
> because of references to _Qp_fgt. This is analogous to all the other
> floating-point symbols allowed in localplt.data, so it seems
> appropriate to allow this one as well.
>
> Tested with build-many-glibcs.py for sparc64-linux-gnu (GCC mainline),
> where it fixes the test failure.
>
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc64/localplt.data b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc64/localplt.data
> index 12520b1586..15c0f8ccf7 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc64/localplt.data
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc64/localplt.data
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ libc.so: _Qp_cmp ?
> libc.so: _Qp_div ?
> libc.so: _Qp_feq ?
> libc.so: _Qp_fge ?
> +libc.so: _Qp_fgt ?
> libc.so: _Qp_fle ?
> libc.so: _Qp_flt ?
> libc.so: _Qp_fne ?
Seems reasonable, thanks.
Florian
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ libc.so: _Qp_cmp ?
libc.so: _Qp_div ?
libc.so: _Qp_feq ?
libc.so: _Qp_fge ?
+libc.so: _Qp_fgt ?
libc.so: _Qp_fle ?
libc.so: _Qp_flt ?
libc.so: _Qp_fne ?