Message ID | 87mtmmgb52.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com |
---|---|
State | Committed |
Commit | cca75bd8b53b82d80299b03b368355b158832c9a |
Headers | show |
Series | i386: Explain why __HAVE_64B_ATOMICS has to be 0 | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
dj/TryBot-apply_patch | success | Patch applied to master at the time it was sent |
dj/TryBot-32bit | success | Build for i686 |
LGTM, thanks. Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> On 02/11/2021 06:27, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > --- > sysdeps/x86/atomic-machine.h | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/atomic-machine.h b/sysdeps/x86/atomic-machine.h > index 695222e4fa..2692d94a92 100644 > --- a/sysdeps/x86/atomic-machine.h > +++ b/sysdeps/x86/atomic-machine.h > @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ typedef uintmax_t uatomic_max_t; > # define BR_CONSTRAINT "q" > # define IBR_CONSTRAINT "iq" > #else > +/* Since the Pentium, i386 CPUs have supported 64-bit atomics, but the > + i386 psABI supplement provides only 4-byte alignment for uint64_t > + inside structs, so it is currently not possible to use 64-bit > + atomics on this platform. */ > # define __HAVE_64B_ATOMICS 0 > # define SP_REG "esp" > # define SEG_REG "gs" >
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/atomic-machine.h b/sysdeps/x86/atomic-machine.h index 695222e4fa..2692d94a92 100644 --- a/sysdeps/x86/atomic-machine.h +++ b/sysdeps/x86/atomic-machine.h @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ typedef uintmax_t uatomic_max_t; # define BR_CONSTRAINT "q" # define IBR_CONSTRAINT "iq" #else +/* Since the Pentium, i386 CPUs have supported 64-bit atomics, but the + i386 psABI supplement provides only 4-byte alignment for uint64_t + inside structs, so it is currently not possible to use 64-bit + atomics on this platform. */ # define __HAVE_64B_ATOMICS 0 # define SP_REG "esp" # define SEG_REG "gs"