[02/56] S390: Use hwcap instead of dl_hwcap in ifunc-resolvers.

Message ID 8510bbfc-ba54-d16e-405e-5e1e692b2696@linux.ibm.com
State Committed
Headers

Commit Message

Stefan Liebler Dec. 3, 2018, 8:20 a.m. UTC
  On 11/30/2018 06:36 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Stefan Liebler:
> 
>> +  if (__glibc_likely((hwcap & HWCAP_S390_STFLE)				\
> 
> Missing space before paren.  Since HWCAP_S390_STFLE 4 is four, this
> __glibc_likely is actually equivalent to __glibc_unlikely, so perhaps
> you should drop it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Florian
> 

Hi Florian,

I've added the missing space.

The condition of __glibc_likely does not result in the value "4"
as the full condition is:
(hwcap & HWCAP_S390_STFLE)
&& (hwcap & HWCAP_S390_ZARCH)
&& (hwcap & HWCAP_S390_HIGH_GPRS)

If hwcap is e.g. 518, then the result is one and __glibc_likely is not 
equivalent to __glibc_unlikely.

Note: here are the other HWCAP_S390 defines:
#define HWCAP_S390_STFLE        4
#define HWCAP_S390_ZARCH        2
#define HWCAP_S390_HIGH_GPRS    512

Thanks.
Stefan
  

Comments

Florian Weimer Dec. 3, 2018, 4:28 p.m. UTC | #1
* Stefan Liebler:

> I've added the missing space.

Thanks.

> The condition of __glibc_likely does not result in the value "4"
> as the full condition is:
> (hwcap & HWCAP_S390_STFLE)
> && (hwcap & HWCAP_S390_ZARCH)
> && (hwcap & HWCAP_S390_HIGH_GPRS)

You are right, of course.  Sorry for the noise.

Florian
  

Patch

From faeb0c30779296d58baab460e4671bc5e60d2609 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:42:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 02/56] S390: Use hwcap instead of dl_hwcap in ifunc-resolvers.

The renaming of hwcap arguments in ifunc-resolvers is needed
in order to prepare for further commits which refactors
ifunc handling for memset, memcmp, and memcpy.  Now you are able
to use s390_libc_ifunc_init which stores the stfle bits
within the expression for an ifunc-resolver generated by
s390_libc_ifunc_expr.

ChangeLog:

	* sysdeps/s390/multiarch/ifunc-resolve.h
	(s390_libc_ifunc_init, s390_libc_ifunc,
	s390_vx_libc_ifunc2_redirected): Use hwcap instead of dl_hwcap.
---
 sysdeps/s390/multiarch/ifunc-resolve.h | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sysdeps/s390/multiarch/ifunc-resolve.h b/sysdeps/s390/multiarch/ifunc-resolve.h
index b42ed922fd..b7e20abc59 100644
--- a/sysdeps/s390/multiarch/ifunc-resolve.h
+++ b/sysdeps/s390/multiarch/ifunc-resolve.h
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ 
 		       : : "cc");
 #define s390_libc_ifunc_init()						\
   unsigned long long stfle_bits = 0ULL;					\
-  if (__glibc_likely((dl_hwcap & HWCAP_S390_STFLE)			\
-		     && (dl_hwcap & HWCAP_S390_ZARCH)			\
-		     && (dl_hwcap & HWCAP_S390_HIGH_GPRS)))		\
+  if (__glibc_likely ((hwcap & HWCAP_S390_STFLE)			\
+		      && (hwcap & HWCAP_S390_ZARCH)			\
+		      && (hwcap & HWCAP_S390_HIGH_GPRS)))		\
     {									\
       S390_STORE_STFLE (stfle_bits);					\
     }
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ 
 	   : __glibc_likely (S390_IS_Z10 (stfle_bits))			\
 	     ? RESOLVERFUNC##_z10					\
 	     : RESOLVERFUNC##_default,					\
-	   unsigned long int dl_hwcap, s390_libc_ifunc_init);
+	   unsigned long int hwcap, s390_libc_ifunc_init);
 
 #define s390_vx_libc_ifunc(FUNC)		\
   s390_vx_libc_ifunc2_redirected(FUNC, FUNC, FUNC)
@@ -79,10 +79,10 @@ 
   extern __typeof (TYPE_FUNC) RESOLVERFUNC##_vx attribute_hidden;	\
   extern __typeof (TYPE_FUNC) RESOLVERFUNC##_c attribute_hidden;	\
   __ifunc (TYPE_FUNC, FUNC,						\
-	   (dl_hwcap & HWCAP_S390_VX)					\
+	   (hwcap & HWCAP_S390_VX)					\
 	   ? RESOLVERFUNC##_vx						\
 	   : RESOLVERFUNC##_c,						\
-	   unsigned long int dl_hwcap, s390_vx_libc_ifunc_init);
+	   unsigned long int hwcap, s390_vx_libc_ifunc_init);
 
 #define s390_libc_ifunc_expr_init()
 #define s390_libc_ifunc_expr(TYPE_FUNC, FUNC, EXPR)		\
-- 
2.17.0