From patchwork Thu Feb 2 18:11:29 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Adhemerval Zanella X-Patchwork-Id: 64168 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484E43894C04 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:14:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 484E43894C04 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1675361645; bh=Hq+8ZvNSfJ7ySgnTJMywy4nixCEK/WHKYTKluA2XoCE=; h=To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=EkHutF5YS88RF4OcPBVL0qGENL7dU4OpWuJokxkxWHQzpCu9pbzplMMKci+oErcWw xh/o8XrRyWCGbFNJFEGgLVXS135esS2noKoK5Han570EpjcAONE0xeKyY4glulv3IG thM9H8v/+rVgbz1ZvLhR4fHptzHkWU9m1pMnn78c= X-Original-To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Delivered-To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A1E385B532 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:12:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 51A1E385B532 Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id e21-20020a9d5615000000b006884e5dce99so693071oti.5 for ; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:12:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Hq+8ZvNSfJ7ySgnTJMywy4nixCEK/WHKYTKluA2XoCE=; b=GIq5ehL/So6V3p18OxYeMhwbarRKxcAWOW/z88NPAQxL4y7TL+zvbvShPvau6yc0X+ 71Qcv3h2LSUciGtEsdwpG5JRnDlDzMJGRz+L7zG4bc50vywdVx9yiH9TDbDXQ+PXMion gRSA6j6+A1ixqfLWQwDkHmP7t7rEgjsmb1oArJSlvBGi+IrzzHidWLZjSjjUjaPhaq/a tmioi4bdYnuXk/ZjSQYPoC8QObQ1661AhNvcO9F+t6OAK+7pVwyHRgq/ziHAv/SWHf0Z pJWJdMMAGncBwf+iQ6963r8l5CPc6JDhMErduM5hvXFMQauMO07yjpyEEjs9TumhjeS1 B67A== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVpaVSl9anD6nivy3hyynvR3BIBQ5smZVxlhmd49RZEbnmszugP ZObUM09ARIu1hvZ0cylRNWDofc0erHP2BwQhLN0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/NwBP5y4N0XMXANQD3Y02sMPjD4omXgBKT7SpqS6p0W+UPJDvyw7Awoh2CFHvoWGYMHUs8FQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1b27:0:b0:68b:dd09:2b6 with SMTP id l36-20020a9d1b27000000b0068bdd0902b6mr4260285otl.25.1675361543270; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:12:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mandiga.. ([2804:1b3:a7c2:1887:da12:b9d3:2162:a28c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ci10-20020a05683063ca00b00684a10970adsm126689otb.16.2023.02.02.10.12.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:12:22 -0800 (PST) To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Richard Henderson , Jeff Law , Xi Ruoyao , Noah Goldstein Subject: [PATCH v12 11/31] string: Improve generic memchr Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 15:11:29 -0300 Message-Id: <20230202181149.2181553-12-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230202181149.2181553-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> References: <20230202181149.2181553-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha From: Adhemerval Zanella Reply-To: Adhemerval Zanella Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" New algorithm read the first aligned address and mask off the unwanted bytes (this strategy is similar to arch-specific implementations used on powerpc, sparc, and sh). The loop now read word-aligned address and check using the has_eq macro. Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu, i686-linux-gnu, powerpc-linux-gnu, and powerpc64-linux-gnu by removing the arch-specific assembly implementation and disabling multi-arch (it covers both LE and BE for 64 and 32 bits). Co-authored-by: Richard Henderson Reviewed-by: Noah Goldstein Reviewed-by: Noah Goldstein --- string/memchr.c | 176 +++++------------- .../powerpc32/power4/multiarch/memchr-ppc32.c | 14 +- .../powerpc64/multiarch/memchr-ppc64.c | 9 +- 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-) diff --git a/string/memchr.c b/string/memchr.c index f800d47dce..4f497d6166 100644 --- a/string/memchr.c +++ b/string/memchr.c @@ -1,10 +1,6 @@ -/* Copyright (C) 1991-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +/* Scan memory for a character. Generic version + Copyright (C) 1991-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This file is part of the GNU C Library. - Based on strlen implementation by Torbjorn Granlund (tege@sics.se), - with help from Dan Sahlin (dan@sics.se) and - commentary by Jim Blandy (jimb@ai.mit.edu); - adaptation to memchr suggested by Dick Karpinski (dick@cca.ucsf.edu), - and implemented by Roland McGrath (roland@ai.mit.edu). The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public @@ -20,143 +16,73 @@ License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see . */ -#ifndef _LIBC -# include -#endif - +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include #include -#include +#undef memchr -#include - -#undef __memchr -#ifdef _LIBC -# undef memchr +#ifdef MEMCHR +# define __memchr MEMCHR #endif -#ifndef weak_alias -# define __memchr memchr -#endif - -#ifndef MEMCHR -# define MEMCHR __memchr -#endif +static __always_inline const char * +sadd (uintptr_t x, uintptr_t y) +{ + return (const char *)(y > UINTPTR_MAX - x ? UINTPTR_MAX : x + y); +} /* Search no more than N bytes of S for C. */ void * -MEMCHR (void const *s, int c_in, size_t n) +__memchr (void const *s, int c_in, size_t n) { - /* On 32-bit hardware, choosing longword to be a 32-bit unsigned - long instead of a 64-bit uintmax_t tends to give better - performance. On 64-bit hardware, unsigned long is generally 64 - bits already. Change this typedef to experiment with - performance. */ - typedef unsigned long int longword; - - const unsigned char *char_ptr; - const longword *longword_ptr; - longword repeated_one; - longword repeated_c; - unsigned char c; - - c = (unsigned char) c_in; - - /* Handle the first few bytes by reading one byte at a time. - Do this until CHAR_PTR is aligned on a longword boundary. */ - for (char_ptr = (const unsigned char *) s; - n > 0 && (size_t) char_ptr % sizeof (longword) != 0; - --n, ++char_ptr) - if (*char_ptr == c) - return (void *) char_ptr; - - longword_ptr = (const longword *) char_ptr; - - /* All these elucidatory comments refer to 4-byte longwords, - but the theory applies equally well to any size longwords. */ - - /* Compute auxiliary longword values: - repeated_one is a value which has a 1 in every byte. - repeated_c has c in every byte. */ - repeated_one = 0x01010101; - repeated_c = c | (c << 8); - repeated_c |= repeated_c << 16; - if (0xffffffffU < (longword) -1) + if (__glibc_unlikely (n == 0)) + return NULL; + + /* Read the first word, but munge it so that bytes before the array + will not match goal. */ + const op_t *word_ptr = PTR_ALIGN_DOWN (s, sizeof (op_t)); + uintptr_t s_int = (uintptr_t) s; + + op_t word = *word_ptr; + op_t repeated_c = repeat_bytes (c_in); + /* Compute the address of the last byte taking in consideration possible + overflow. */ + const char *lbyte = sadd (s_int, n - 1); + /* And also the address of the word containing the last byte. */ + const op_t *lword = (const op_t *) PTR_ALIGN_DOWN (lbyte, sizeof (op_t)); + + find_t mask = shift_find (find_eq_all (word, repeated_c), s_int); + if (mask != 0) { - repeated_one |= repeated_one << 31 << 1; - repeated_c |= repeated_c << 31 << 1; - if (8 < sizeof (longword)) - { - size_t i; - - for (i = 64; i < sizeof (longword) * 8; i *= 2) - { - repeated_one |= repeated_one << i; - repeated_c |= repeated_c << i; - } - } + char *ret = (char *) s + index_first (mask); + return (ret <= lbyte) ? ret : NULL; } + if (word_ptr == lword) + return NULL; - /* Instead of the traditional loop which tests each byte, we will test a - longword at a time. The tricky part is testing if *any of the four* - bytes in the longword in question are equal to c. We first use an xor - with repeated_c. This reduces the task to testing whether *any of the - four* bytes in longword1 is zero. - - We compute tmp = - ((longword1 - repeated_one) & ~longword1) & (repeated_one << 7). - That is, we perform the following operations: - 1. Subtract repeated_one. - 2. & ~longword1. - 3. & a mask consisting of 0x80 in every byte. - Consider what happens in each byte: - - If a byte of longword1 is zero, step 1 and 2 transform it into 0xff, - and step 3 transforms it into 0x80. A carry can also be propagated - to more significant bytes. - - If a byte of longword1 is nonzero, let its lowest 1 bit be at - position k (0 <= k <= 7); so the lowest k bits are 0. After step 1, - the byte ends in a single bit of value 0 and k bits of value 1. - After step 2, the result is just k bits of value 1: 2^k - 1. After - step 3, the result is 0. And no carry is produced. - So, if longword1 has only non-zero bytes, tmp is zero. - Whereas if longword1 has a zero byte, call j the position of the least - significant zero byte. Then the result has a zero at positions 0, ..., - j-1 and a 0x80 at position j. We cannot predict the result at the more - significant bytes (positions j+1..3), but it does not matter since we - already have a non-zero bit at position 8*j+7. - - So, the test whether any byte in longword1 is zero is equivalent to - testing whether tmp is nonzero. */ - - while (n >= sizeof (longword)) + word = *++word_ptr; + while (word_ptr != lword) { - longword longword1 = *longword_ptr ^ repeated_c; - - if ((((longword1 - repeated_one) & ~longword1) - & (repeated_one << 7)) != 0) - break; - longword_ptr++; - n -= sizeof (longword); + if (has_eq (word, repeated_c)) + return (char *) word_ptr + index_first_eq (word, repeated_c); + word = *++word_ptr; } - char_ptr = (const unsigned char *) longword_ptr; - - /* At this point, we know that either n < sizeof (longword), or one of the - sizeof (longword) bytes starting at char_ptr is == c. On little-endian - machines, we could determine the first such byte without any further - memory accesses, just by looking at the tmp result from the last loop - iteration. But this does not work on big-endian machines. Choose code - that works in both cases. */ - - for (; n > 0; --n, ++char_ptr) + if (has_eq (word, repeated_c)) { - if (*char_ptr == c) - return (void *) char_ptr; + /* We found a match, but it might be in a byte past the end of the + array. */ + char *ret = (char *) word_ptr + index_first_eq (word, repeated_c); + if (ret <= lbyte) + return ret; } - return NULL; } -#ifdef weak_alias +#ifndef MEMCHR weak_alias (__memchr, memchr) -#endif libc_hidden_builtin_def (memchr) +#endif diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/power4/multiarch/memchr-ppc32.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/power4/multiarch/memchr-ppc32.c index 39ff84f3f3..a78585650f 100644 --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/power4/multiarch/memchr-ppc32.c +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/power4/multiarch/memchr-ppc32.c @@ -18,17 +18,11 @@ #include -#define MEMCHR __memchr_ppc +extern __typeof (memchr) __memchr_ppc attribute_hidden; -#undef weak_alias -#define weak_alias(a, b) +#define MEMCHR __memchr_ppc +#include #ifdef SHARED -# undef libc_hidden_builtin_def -# define libc_hidden_builtin_def(name) \ - __hidden_ver1(__memchr_ppc, __GI_memchr, __memchr_ppc); +__hidden_ver1(__memchr_ppc, __GI_memchr, __memchr_ppc); #endif - -extern __typeof (memchr) __memchr_ppc attribute_hidden; - -#include diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/multiarch/memchr-ppc64.c b/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/multiarch/memchr-ppc64.c index 8097df709c..49ba5521fe 100644 --- a/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/multiarch/memchr-ppc64.c +++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/multiarch/memchr-ppc64.c @@ -18,14 +18,7 @@ #include -#define MEMCHR __memchr_ppc - -#undef weak_alias -#define weak_alias(a, b) - -# undef libc_hidden_builtin_def -# define libc_hidden_builtin_def(name) - extern __typeof (memchr) __memchr_ppc attribute_hidden; +#define MEMCHR __memchr_ppc #include