Message ID | 20200922121300.3503-1-eb@emlix.com |
---|---|
State | Committed |
Commit | 7ee881f1f46dbc70ce6acdd67f7a8146ac338158 |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] rtld: fix typo in comment | expand |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:13 AM Rolf Eike Beer <eb@emlix.com> wrote: > > --- > elf/rtld.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/elf/rtld.c b/elf/rtld.c > index 5b882163fa..99d130cd1c 100644 > --- a/elf/rtld.c > +++ b/elf/rtld.c > @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ struct rtld_global _rtld_global = > }; > /* If we would use strong_alias here the compiler would see a > non-hidden definition. This would undo the effect of the previous > - declaration. So spell out was strong_alias does plus add the > + declaration. So spell out what strong_alias does plus add the > visibility attribute. */ > extern struct rtld_global _rtld_local > __attribute__ ((alias ("_rtld_global"), visibility ("hidden"))); > -- > 2.28.0 > LGTM. Thanks.
Am Dienstag, 22. September 2020, 14:23:40 CEST schrieb H.J. Lu: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:13 AM Rolf Eike Beer <eb@emlix.com> wrote: > > --- > > > > elf/rtld.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/elf/rtld.c b/elf/rtld.c > > index 5b882163fa..99d130cd1c 100644 > > --- a/elf/rtld.c > > +++ b/elf/rtld.c > > @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ struct rtld_global _rtld_global = > > > > }; > > > > /* If we would use strong_alias here the compiler would see a > > > > non-hidden definition. This would undo the effect of the previous > > > > - declaration. So spell out was strong_alias does plus add the > > + declaration. So spell out what strong_alias does plus add the > > > > visibility attribute. */ > > > > extern struct rtld_global _rtld_local > > > > __attribute__ ((alias ("_rtld_global"), visibility ("hidden"))); > > > > -- > > 2.28.0 > > LGTM. Is anyone going to pick it up? Eike
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 12:08 AM Rolf Eike Beer <eb@emlix.com> wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 22. September 2020, 14:23:40 CEST schrieb H.J. Lu: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:13 AM Rolf Eike Beer <eb@emlix.com> wrote: > > > --- > > > > > > elf/rtld.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/elf/rtld.c b/elf/rtld.c > > > index 5b882163fa..99d130cd1c 100644 > > > --- a/elf/rtld.c > > > +++ b/elf/rtld.c > > > @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ struct rtld_global _rtld_global = > > > > > > }; > > > > > > /* If we would use strong_alias here the compiler would see a > > > > > > non-hidden definition. This would undo the effect of the previous > > > > > > - declaration. So spell out was strong_alias does plus add the > > > + declaration. So spell out what strong_alias does plus add the > > > > > > visibility attribute. */ > > > > > > extern struct rtld_global _rtld_local > > > > > > __attribute__ ((alias ("_rtld_global"), visibility ("hidden"))); > > > > > > -- > > > 2.28.0 > > > > LGTM. > > Is anyone going to pick it up? I checked it in for you. Thanks.
diff --git a/elf/rtld.c b/elf/rtld.c index 5b882163fa..99d130cd1c 100644 --- a/elf/rtld.c +++ b/elf/rtld.c @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ struct rtld_global _rtld_global = }; /* If we would use strong_alias here the compiler would see a non-hidden definition. This would undo the effect of the previous - declaration. So spell out was strong_alias does plus add the + declaration. So spell out what strong_alias does plus add the visibility attribute. */ extern struct rtld_global _rtld_local __attribute__ ((alias ("_rtld_global"), visibility ("hidden")));