diff mbox

Fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning in xdr.c

Message ID 20140710050653.GY609@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com
State Committed
Headers show

Commit Message

Siddhesh Poyarekar July 10, 2014, 5:06 a.m. UTC 
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:39:45PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Nowadays, we probably want to use a balancing test of the performance vs
> the ease-of-maintenance improvement of eliminating warnings.  It seems
> almost certain that we don't care about the cost of the dead store in
> xdr_string.  But IMHO it should always be an explicit decision to trade off
> after careful consideration of the particular case.  It should never be a
> default-OK to pessimize the code to work around the compiler's lack of
> intelligence.  Certainly any change made for that reason should have
> comments saying that the initialization is not actually desirable but was
> added to silence a compiler warning.

OK, I'll keep this in mind.  I've also added a comment like you
suggested.

Thanks,
Siddhesh

commit d69b7f5ac02989ce3d8577eed86da3e0c8af6c1c
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jul 10 10:32:29 2014 +0530

    Add comment about SIZE initialization in xdr.c
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index dfd393b..a8aa74b 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ 
+2014-07-10  Siddhesh Poyarekar  <siddhesh@redhat.com>
+
+	* sunrpc/xdr.c (xdr_string): Add comment about SIZE
+	initialization.
+
 2014-07-09  David S. Miller  <davem@davemloft.net>
 
 	* sysdeps/sparc/fpu/libm-test-ulps: Update.
diff --git a/sunrpc/xdr.c b/sunrpc/xdr.c
index 129abd8..fade667 100644
--- a/sunrpc/xdr.c
+++ b/sunrpc/xdr.c
@@ -739,6 +739,8 @@  xdr_string (xdrs, cpp, maxsize)
      u_int maxsize;
 {
   char *sp = *cpp;	/* sp is the actual string pointer */
+  /* Initialize to silence the compiler.  It is not really needed because SIZE
+     never actually gets used without being initialized.  */
   u_int size = 0;
   u_int nodesize;