gdb: more filename styling
Checks
Commit Message
I spotted a few places in solib.c and build-id.c where we could apply
file name styling.
Other than the extra styling, there should be no user visible changes
after this commit.
---
gdb/build-id.c | 10 ++++++----
gdb/solib.c | 16 ++++++++++------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
base-commit: 868883583e7520ff1bd99fcb224d2b33a990edff
Comments
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> writes:
Andrew> I spotted a few places in solib.c and build-id.c where we could apply
Andrew> file name styling.
Andrew> Other than the extra styling, there should be no user visible changes
Andrew> after this commit.
Ok. Thanks for doing this.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Andrew> "Do you need \"set solib-search-path\" "
Andrew> "or \"set sysroot\"?"),
Unrelated but I wonder if commands ought to be styled as well.
Tom
Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> writes:
>>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Andrew> I spotted a few places in solib.c and build-id.c where we could apply
> Andrew> file name styling.
>
> Andrew> Other than the extra styling, there should be no user visible changes
> Andrew> after this commit.
>
> Ok. Thanks for doing this.
> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
>
> Andrew> "Do you need \"set solib-search-path\" "
> Andrew> "or \"set sysroot\"?"),
>
> Unrelated but I wonder if commands ought to be styled as well.
That might be nice. Do we have a style for commands? I couldn't see
one, but maybe we use one of the existing styles?
Anyway, I pushed this patch.
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew> "Do you need \"set solib-search-path\" "
Andrew> "or \"set sysroot\"?"),
>> Unrelated but I wonder if commands ought to be styled as well.
Andrew> That might be nice. Do we have a style for commands? I couldn't see
Andrew> one, but maybe we use one of the existing styles?
The "help" stuff uses either "highlight" or "title" style, I forget
which. Kind of unfortunately named.
Tom
@@ -60,12 +60,14 @@ build_id_verify (bfd *abfd, size_t check_len, const bfd_byte *check)
found = build_id_bfd_get (abfd);
if (found == NULL)
- warning (_("File \"%s\" has no build-id, file skipped"),
- bfd_get_filename (abfd));
+ warning (_("File \"%ps\" has no build-id, file skipped"),
+ styled_string (file_name_style.style (),
+ bfd_get_filename (abfd)));
else if (found->size != check_len
|| memcmp (found->data, check, found->size) != 0)
- warning (_("File \"%s\" has a different build-id, file skipped"),
- bfd_get_filename (abfd));
+ warning (_("File \"%ps\" has a different build-id, file skipped"),
+ styled_string (file_name_style.style (),
+ bfd_get_filename (abfd)));
else
retval = 1;
@@ -903,16 +903,19 @@ update_solib_list (int from_tty)
stand out well. */
if (not_found == 1)
- warning (_ ("Could not load shared library symbols for %s.\n"
+ warning (_ ("Could not load shared library symbols for %ps.\n"
"Do you need \"set solib-search-path\" "
"or \"set sysroot\"?"),
- not_found_filename);
+ styled_string (file_name_style.style (),
+ not_found_filename));
else if (not_found > 1)
warning (_ ("\
-Could not load shared library symbols for %d libraries, e.g. %s.\n\
+Could not load shared library symbols for %d libraries, e.g. %ps.\n\
Use the \"info sharedlibrary\" command to see the complete listing.\n\
Do you need \"set solib-search-path\" or \"set sysroot\"?"),
- not_found, not_found_filename);
+ not_found,
+ styled_string (file_name_style.style (),
+ not_found_filename));
}
}
@@ -1005,8 +1008,9 @@ solib_add (const char *pattern, int from_tty, int readsyms)
/* If no pattern was given, be quiet for shared
libraries we have already loaded. */
if (pattern && (from_tty || info_verbose))
- gdb_printf (_ ("Symbols already loaded for %s\n"),
- gdb.so_name.c_str ());
+ gdb_printf (_ ("Symbols already loaded for %ps\n"),
+ styled_string (file_name_style.style (),
+ gdb.so_name.c_str ()));
}
else if (solib_read_symbols (gdb, add_flags))
loaded_any_symbols = true;