From patchwork Mon Feb 17 19:20:22 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Simon Marchi X-Patchwork-Id: 38191 Received: (qmail 103905 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2020 19:20:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Delivered-To: mailing list gdb-patches@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 103863 invoked by uid 89); 17 Feb 2020 19:20:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-17.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, GIT_PATCH_1, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:20:27 +0000 Received: from [172.16.0.95] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53F381E092; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:20:23 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gdb: fix printing of flag enums with multi-bit enumerators To: Luis Machado , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20200213203035.30157-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com> <20200213203035.30157-2-simon.marchi@efficios.com> <2e83ba29-99c4-d611-45ec-ee98ac81fc34@linaro.org> <78d03fba-9901-01d5-c1ed-9631986e2579@simark.ca> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <6de31f86-c2b1-17a0-9db1-4cc5c26a315a@simark.ca> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:20:22 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: On 2020-02-17 12:40 p.m., Luis Machado wrote: >> Do you mean a typo in the comment, or the type name?  Because there indeed seems >> to be a typo, it should read "but with no enumerator with value", not >> "but with enumerator with value". > > Sorry, i should've been more clear. I meant the comment saying "but with enumerator with value". You guessed it right. Ok, thanks. Here is the new version of this patch. From 3db3fe30c045a020a07a48c8e0123e9e44274d77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Marchi Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:36:53 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gdb: fix printing of flag enums with multi-bit enumerators GDB has this feature where if an enum looks like it is meant to represent binary flags, it will present the values of that type as a bitwise OR of the flags that are set in the value. The original motivation for this patch is to fix this behavior: enum hello { AAA = 0x1, BBB = 0xf0 }; (gdb) p (enum hello) 0x11 $1 = (AAA | BBB) This is wrong because the bits set in BBB (0xf0) are not all set in the value 0x11, but GDB presents it as if they all were. I think that enumerations with enumerators that have more than one bit set should simply not qualify as "flag enum", as far as this heuristic is concerned. I'm not sure what it means to have flags of more than one bit. So this is what this patch implements. I have added an assert in generic_val_print_enum_1 to make sure the flag enum types respect that, in case they are used by other debug info readers, in the future. I've enhanced the gdb.base/printcmds.exp test to cover this case. I've also added tests for printing flag enums with value 0, both when the enumeration has and doesn't have an enumerator for value 0. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/read.c: Include "count-one-bits.h". (update_enumeration_type_from_children): If an enumerator has multiple bits set, don't treat the enumeration as a "flag enum". * valprint.c (generic_val_print_enum_1): Assert that enumerators of flag enums have 0 or 1 bit set. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.base/printcmds.c (enum flag_enum): Prefix enumerators with FE_, add FE_NONE. (three): Update. (enum flag_enum_without_zero): New enum. (flag_enum_without_zero): New variable. (enum not_flag_enum): New enum. (three_not_flag): New variable. * gdb.base/printcmds.exp (test_artificial_arrays): Update. (test_print_enums): Add more tests for printing flag enums. --- gdb/dwarf2/read.c | 12 ++++++++--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp | 20 ++++++++++++++++--- gdb/valprint.c | 8 +++++++- 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/read.c b/gdb/dwarf2/read.c index e74383e01dcc..5a77b62b5a05 100644 --- a/gdb/dwarf2/read.c +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/read.c @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ #include "gdbsupport/selftest.h" #include "rust-lang.h" #include "gdbsupport/pathstuff.h" +#include "count-one-bits.h" /* When == 1, print basic high level tracing messages. When > 1, be more verbose. @@ -15526,10 +15527,15 @@ update_enumeration_type_from_children (struct die_info *die, unsigned_enum = 0; flag_enum = 0; } - else if ((mask & value) != 0) - flag_enum = 0; else - mask |= value; + { + if (count_one_bits_ll (value) >= 2) + flag_enum = 0; + else if ((mask & value) != 0) + flag_enum = 0; + else + mask |= value; + } /* If we already know that the enum type is neither unsigned, nor a flag type, no need to look at the rest of the enumerates. */ diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.c index 57e04e6c01f3..acb3cb3ad25e 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.c +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.c @@ -96,9 +96,35 @@ enum some_volatile_enum { enumvolval1, enumvolval2 }; name. See PR11827. */ volatile enum some_volatile_enum some_volatile_enum = enumvolval1; -enum flag_enum { ONE = 1, TWO = 2 }; +/* An enum considered as a "flag enum". */ +enum flag_enum +{ + FE_NONE = 0x00, + FE_ONE = 0x01, + FE_TWO = 0x02, +}; + +enum flag_enum three = FE_ONE | FE_TWO; + +/* Another enum considered as a "flag enum", but with no enumerator with value + 0. */ +enum flag_enum_without_zero +{ + FEWZ_ONE = 0x01, + FEWZ_TWO = 0x02, +}; + +enum flag_enum_without_zero flag_enum_without_zero = 0; + +/* Not a flag enum, an enumerator value has multiple bits sets. */ +enum not_flag_enum +{ + NFE_ONE = 0x01, + NFE_TWO = 0x02, + NFE_F0 = 0xf0, +}; -enum flag_enum three = ONE | TWO; +enum not_flag_enum three_not_flag = NFE_ONE | NFE_TWO; /* A structure with an embedded array at an offset > 0. The array has all elements with the same repeating value, which must not be the diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp index 6e98b7943ba3..6afb965af066 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp @@ -653,9 +653,9 @@ proc test_artificial_arrays {} { gdb_test_escape_braces "p int1dim\[0\]${ctrlv}@2${ctrlv}@3" \ "({{0, 1}, {2, 3}, {4, 5}}|\[Cc\]annot.*)" \ {p int1dim[0]@2@3} - gdb_test_escape_braces "p int1dim\[0\]${ctrlv}@TWO" " = {0, 1}" \ + gdb_test_escape_braces "p int1dim\[0\]${ctrlv}@FE_TWO" " = {0, 1}" \ {p int1dim[0]@TWO} - gdb_test_escape_braces "p int1dim\[0\]${ctrlv}@TWO${ctrlv}@three" \ + gdb_test_escape_braces "p int1dim\[0\]${ctrlv}@FE_TWO${ctrlv}@three" \ "({{0, 1}, {2, 3}, {4, 5}}|\[Cc\]annot.*)" \ {p int1dim[0]@TWO@three} gdb_test_escape_braces {p/x (short [])0x12345678} \ @@ -736,7 +736,21 @@ proc test_print_enums {} { # Regression test for PR11827. gdb_test "print some_volatile_enum" "enumvolval1" - gdb_test "print three" " = \\\(ONE \\| TWO\\\)" + # Print a flag enum. + gdb_test "print three" [string_to_regexp " = (FE_ONE | FE_TWO)"] + + # Print a flag enum with value 0, where an enumerator has value 0. + gdb_test "print (enum flag_enum) 0x0" [string_to_regexp " = FE_NONE"] + + # Print a flag enum with value 0, where no enumerator has value 0. + gdb_test "print flag_enum_without_zero" [string_to_regexp " = (unknown: 0)"] + + # Print a flag enum with unknown bits set. + gdb_test "print (enum flag_enum) 0xf1" [string_to_regexp " = (FE_ONE | unknown: 240)"] + + # Test printing an enum not considered a "flag enum" (because one of its + # enumerators has multiple bits set). + gdb_test "print three_not_flag" [string_to_regexp " = 3"] } proc test_printf {} { diff --git a/gdb/valprint.c b/gdb/valprint.c index f26a87da3bd4..77b9a4993d79 100644 --- a/gdb/valprint.c +++ b/gdb/valprint.c @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ #include "cli/cli-option.h" #include "gdbarch.h" #include "cli/cli-style.h" +#include "count-one-bits.h" /* Maximum number of wchars returned from wchar_iterate. */ #define MAX_WCHARS 4 @@ -638,7 +639,12 @@ generic_val_print_enum_1 (struct type *type, LONGEST val, { QUIT; - if ((val & TYPE_FIELD_ENUMVAL (type, i)) != 0) + ULONGEST enumval = TYPE_FIELD_ENUMVAL (type, i); + int nbits = count_one_bits_ll (enumval); + + gdb_assert (nbits == 0 || nbits == 1); + + if ((val & enumval) != 0) { if (!first) fputs_filtered (" | ", stream);