On 29/05/2014 10:41 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 12:35 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>> On 28/05/2014 7:31 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> On 04/30/2014 11:55 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>
> Now here's an excellent description / commit message. Thanks!
>
>>
>> After this patch the MEMORY_ERROR encountered during the frame unwind is
>> attached to frame #4 as the stop reason, and is displayed in the CLI each
>> time the backtrace is requested.
>
> Please show examples of this in the commit log too.
Done.
>
>> +
>> + /* The error needs to live as long as the frame does. */
>> + stop_string =
>> + FRAME_OBSTACK_CALLOC (strlen (ex.message) + 1, char);
>
> #1 - Per GNU coding conventions, operators go on the next line, and '='
> is an operator (assignment), so:
>
> stop_string
> = FRAME_OBSTACK_CALLOC (strlen (ex.message) + 1, char);
>
> #2 - sizeof (char) is 1 by definition, so no need for calloc, actually.
> And then that might fit on a single line:
>
> stop_string = FRAME_OBSTACK_ZALLOC (strlen (ex.message) + 1);
>
>> + strcpy (stop_string, ex.message);
>> + this_frame->stop_string = stop_string;
>
> But even better we could do this instead:
>
> size_t size;
>
> size = strlen (ex.message) + 1;
> this_frame->stop_string = FRAME_OBSTACK_ZALLOC (size);
> memcpy (this_frame->stop_string, ex.message, size);
I've changed to this, except that I'm still using a stack local stop_string
to create the message, then assigning to this_frame->stop_string, this allow
this_frame->stop_string to be 'const char *' rather than just 'char *'. I've
added a comment.
>
> Let's include an example to make it clearer:
>
> /* Return a possibly frame specific string explaining why the unwind
> stopped here. E.g., if unwinding tripped on a memory error, this
> will return the error description string, which includes the address
> that we failed to access. If there's no specific reason stored for
> a frame then a generic reason string will be returned.
>
> Should only be called for frames that don't have a previous frame. */
>
> (I imagine that this "Should" will need to be addressed when we expose
> this to Python somehow. We wouldn't want failure to comply to that
> to cause an internal error.)
I've updated the comment. I agree with needing to guard against user error
when we expose this to python/guile, but we can do that later.
>> +/* Return a possibly frame specific string explaining why the unwind
>> + stopped at frame FI. Must only be called if there is no previous
>> + frame. */
>
> Let's just remove this comment, thus avoiding maintaining the same
> description in two places. Note it was already divergent from the
> comment in the header.
Done.
>
>> +
>> +const char *
>> +frame_stop_reason_string (struct frame_info *fi)
>> +{
>> + gdb_assert (fi->prev_p);
>> + gdb_assert (fi->prev == NULL);
>> +
>> + /* Return the specific string if we have one. */
>> + if (fi->stop_string)
>> + return fi->stop_string;
>
> if (fi->stop_string != NULL)
> return fi->stop_string;
Fixed.
Here's the latest version, other than the above changes nothing has really changed.
You seemed happy enough with the last iteration, so if I don't hear anything
else I'll push this in a few days.
Thanks for your time,
Andrew
---
Currently a MEMORY_ERROR raised during unwinding a frame will cause the
unwind to stop with an error message, for example:
(gdb) bt
#0 breakpt () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:27
#1 0x00000000004008f0 in func5 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:32
#2 0x0000000000400900 in func4 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:38
#3 0x0000000000400910 in func3 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:44
#4 0x0000000000400928 in func2 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:50
Cannot access memory at address 0x2aaaaaab0000
However, frame #4 is marked as being the end of the stack unwind, so a
subsequent request for the backtrace looses the error message, such as:
(gdb) bt
#0 breakpt () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:27
#1 0x00000000004008f0 in func5 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:32
#2 0x0000000000400900 in func4 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:38
#3 0x0000000000400910 in func3 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:44
#4 0x0000000000400928 in func2 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:50
When fetching the backtrace, or requesting the stack depth using the MI
interface the situation is even worse, the first time a request is made
we encounter the memory error and so the MI returns an error instead of
the correct result, for example:
(gdb) -stack-info-depth
^error,msg="Cannot access memory at address 0x2aaaaaab0000"
Or,
(gdb) -stack-list-frames
^error,msg="Cannot access memory at address 0x2aaaaaab0000"
However, once one of these commands has been used gdb has, internally,
walked the stack and figured that out that frame #4 is the bottom of the
stack, so the second time an MI command is tried you'll get the "expected"
result:
(gdb) -stack-info-depth
^done,depth="5"
Or,
(gdb) -stack-list-frames
^done,stack=[frame={level="0", .. snip lots .. }]
After this patch the MEMORY_ERROR encountered during the frame unwind is
attached to frame #4 as the stop reason, and is displayed in the CLI each
time the backtrace is requested. In the MI, catching the error means that
the "expected" result is returned the first time the MI command is issued.
So, from the CLI the results of the backtrace will be:
(gdb) bt
#0 breakpt () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:27
#1 0x00000000004008f0 in func5 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:32
#2 0x0000000000400900 in func4 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:38
#3 0x0000000000400910 in func3 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:44
#4 0x0000000000400928 in func2 () at amd64-invalid-stack-middle.c:50
Backtrace stopped: Cannot access memory at address 0x2aaaaaab0000
Each and every time that the backtrace is requested, while the MI output
will similarly be consistently:
(gdb) -stack-info-depth
^done,depth="5"
Or,
(gdb) -stack-list-frames
^done,stack=[frame={level="0", .. snip lots .. }]
gdb/ChangeLog:
* frame.c (struct frame_info): Add stop_string field.
(get_prev_frame_always_1): Renamed from get_prev_frame_always.
(get_prev_frame_always): Old content moved into
get_prev_frame_always_1. Call get_prev_frame_always_1 inside
TRY_CATCH, handle MEMORY_ERROR exceptions.
(frame_stop_reason_string): New function definition.
* frame.h (unwind_stop_reason_to_string): Extend comment to
mention frame_stop_reason_string.
(frame_stop_reason_string): New function declaration.
* stack.c (frame_info): Switch to frame_stop_reason_string.
(backtrace_command_1): Switch to frame_stop_reason_string.
* unwind_stop_reason.def: Add UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR.
(LAST_ENTRY): Changed to UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR.
* guile/lib/gdb.scm: Add FRAME_UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR to export list.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
* guile.texi (Frames In Guile): Mention FRAME_UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR.
* python.texi (Frames In Python): Mention
gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.arch/amd64-invalid-stack-middle.exp: Update expected results.
* gdb.arch/amd64-invalid-stack-top.exp: Likewise.
---
gdb/doc/guile.texi | 3 +
gdb/doc/python.texi | 3 +
gdb/frame.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++--
gdb/frame.h | 15 ++++-
gdb/guile/lib/gdb.scm | 1 +
gdb/stack.c | 4 +-
.../gdb.arch/amd64-invalid-stack-middle.exp | 48 +++-----------
gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-invalid-stack-top.exp | 49 +++-----------
gdb/unwind_stop_reasons.def | 5 +-
9 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)
@@ -1827,6 +1827,9 @@ stack corruption.
The frame unwinder did not find any saved PC, but we needed
one to unwind further.
+@item FRAME_UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR
+The frame unwinder caused an error while trying to access memory.
+
@item FRAME_UNWIND_FIRST_ERROR
Any stop reason greater or equal to this value indicates some kind
of error. This special value facilitates writing code that tests
@@ -3199,6 +3199,9 @@ stack corruption.
The frame unwinder did not find any saved PC, but we needed
one to unwind further.
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR
+The frame unwinder caused an error while trying to access memory.
+
@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_FIRST_ERROR
Any stop reason greater or equal to this value indicates some kind
of error. This special value facilitates writing code that tests
@@ -145,6 +145,10 @@ struct frame_info
/* The reason why we could not set PREV, or UNWIND_NO_REASON if we
could. Only valid when PREV_P is set. */
enum unwind_stop_reason stop_reason;
+
+ /* A frame specific string describing the STOP_REASON in more detail.
+ Only valid when PREV_P is set, but even then may still be NULL. */
+ const char *stop_string;
};
/* A frame stash used to speed up frame lookups. Create a hash table
@@ -1798,14 +1802,12 @@ get_prev_frame_if_no_cycle (struct frame_info *this_frame)
return prev_frame;
}
-/* Return a "struct frame_info" corresponding to the frame that called
- THIS_FRAME. Returns NULL if there is no such frame.
-
- Unlike get_prev_frame, this function always tries to unwind the
- frame. */
+/* Helper function for get_prev_frame_always, this is called inside a
+ TRY_CATCH block. Return the frame that called THIS_FRAME or NULL if
+ there is no such frame. This may throw an exception. */
-struct frame_info *
-get_prev_frame_always (struct frame_info *this_frame)
+static struct frame_info *
+get_prev_frame_always_1 (struct frame_info *this_frame)
{
struct gdbarch *gdbarch;
@@ -1955,6 +1957,50 @@ get_prev_frame_always (struct frame_info *this_frame)
return get_prev_frame_if_no_cycle (this_frame);
}
+/* Return a "struct frame_info" corresponding to the frame that called
+ THIS_FRAME. Returns NULL if there is no such frame.
+
+ Unlike get_prev_frame, this function always tries to unwind the
+ frame. */
+
+struct frame_info *
+get_prev_frame_always (struct frame_info *this_frame)
+{
+ volatile struct gdb_exception ex;
+ struct frame_info *prev_frame = NULL;
+
+ TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
+ {
+ prev_frame = get_prev_frame_always_1 (this_frame);
+ }
+ if (ex.reason < 0)
+ {
+ if (ex.error == MEMORY_ERROR)
+ {
+ this_frame->stop_reason = UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR;
+ if (ex.message != NULL)
+ {
+ char *stop_string;
+ size_t size;
+
+ /* The error needs to live as long as the frame does.
+ Allocate using stack local STOP_STRING then assign the
+ pointer to the frame, this allows the STOP_STRING on the
+ frame to be of type 'const char *'. */
+ size = strlen (ex.message) + 1;
+ stop_string = frame_obstack_zalloc (size);
+ memcpy (stop_string, ex.message, size);
+ this_frame->stop_string = stop_string;
+ }
+ prev_frame = NULL;
+ }
+ else
+ throw_exception (ex);
+ }
+
+ return prev_frame;
+}
+
/* Construct a new "struct frame_info" and link it previous to
this_frame. */
@@ -2576,6 +2622,20 @@ unwind_stop_reason_to_string (enum unwind_stop_reason reason)
}
}
+const char *
+frame_stop_reason_string (struct frame_info *fi)
+{
+ gdb_assert (fi->prev_p);
+ gdb_assert (fi->prev == NULL);
+
+ /* Return the specific string if we have one. */
+ if (fi->stop_string != NULL)
+ return fi->stop_string;
+
+ /* Return the generic string if we have nothing better. */
+ return unwind_stop_reason_to_string (fi->stop_reason);
+}
+
/* Return the enum symbol name of REASON as a string, to use in debug
output. */
@@ -501,10 +501,23 @@ enum unwind_stop_reason
enum unwind_stop_reason get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (struct frame_info *);
-/* Translate a reason code to an informative string. */
+/* Translate a reason code to an informative string. This converts the
+ generic stop reason codes into a generic string describing the code.
+ For a possibly frame specific string explaining the stop reason, use
+ FRAME_STOP_REASON_STRING instead. */
const char *unwind_stop_reason_to_string (enum unwind_stop_reason);
+/* Return a possibly frame specific string explaining why the unwind
+ stopped here. E.g., if unwinding tripped on a memory error, this
+ will return the error description string, which includes the address
+ that we failed to access. If there's no specific reason stored for
+ a frame then a generic reason string will be returned.
+
+ Should only be called for frames that don't have a previous frame. */
+
+const char *frame_stop_reason_string (struct frame_info *);
+
/* Unwind the stack frame so that the value of REGNUM, in the previous
(up, older) frame is returned. If VALUEP is NULL, don't
fetch/compute the value. Instead just return the location of the
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@
FRAME_UNWIND_INNER_ID
FRAME_UNWIND_SAME_ID
FRAME_UNWIND_NO_SAVED_PC
+ FRAME_UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR
frame?
frame-valid?
@@ -1529,7 +1529,7 @@ frame_info (char *addr_exp, int from_tty)
reason = get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (fi);
if (reason != UNWIND_NO_REASON)
printf_filtered (_(" Outermost frame: %s\n"),
- unwind_stop_reason_to_string (reason));
+ frame_stop_reason_string (fi));
}
else if (get_frame_type (fi) == TAILCALL_FRAME)
puts_filtered (" tail call frame");
@@ -1848,7 +1848,7 @@ backtrace_command_1 (char *count_exp, int show_locals, int no_filters,
reason = get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (trailing);
if (reason >= UNWIND_FIRST_ERROR)
printf_filtered (_("Backtrace stopped: %s\n"),
- unwind_stop_reason_to_string (reason));
+ frame_stop_reason_string (trailing));
}
}
}
@@ -43,27 +43,11 @@ if ![runto breakpt] {
return -1
}
-gdb_test "bt" "^bt\r\n#0 +breakpt *\\(\\) \[^\r\n\]*\r\n#1 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func5\[^\r\n\]*\r\n#2 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func4\[^\r\n\]*\r\n#3 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func3\[^\r\n\]*\r\nCannot access memory at address 0x\[0-9a-f\]+" \
+gdb_test "bt" "^bt\r\n#0 +breakpt *\\(\\) \[^\r\n\]*\r\n#1 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func5\[^\r\n\]*\r\n#2 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func4\[^\r\n\]*\r\n#3 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func3\[^\r\n\]*\r\nBacktrace stopped: Cannot access memory at address 0x\[0-9a-f\]+" \
"first backtrace, with error message"
-send_gdb "bt\n"
-gdb_expect {
- -re "^bt\r\n#0 +breakpt *\\(\\) \[^\r\n\]*\r\n#1 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func5\[^\r\n\]*\r\n#2 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func4\[^\r\n\]*\r\n#3 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func3\[^\r\n\]*\r\nCannot access memory at address 0x\[0-9a-f\]+\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- # Currently gdb will not display the error message associated with
- # the truncated backtrace after the first backtrace has been
- # completed. Ideally, we would do this. If this case is ever hit
- # then we have started to display the backtrace in all cases and
- # the xpass should becomd a pass, and the previous pass case below
- # should be removed, or changed to a fail.
- xpass "second backtrace, with error message"
- }
- -re "^bt\r\n#0 +breakpt *\\(\\) \[^\r\n\]*\r\n#1 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func5\[^\r\n\]*\r\n#2 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func4\[^\r\n\]*\r\n#3 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func3\[^\r\n\]*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- pass "second backtrace, without error message"
- }
- timeout {
- fail "second backtrace (timeout)"
- }
-}
+gdb_test "bt" "^bt\r\n#0 +breakpt *\\(\\) \[^\r\n\]*\r\n#1 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func5\[^\r\n\]*\r\n#2 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func4\[^\r\n\]*\r\n#3 +0x\[0-9a-f\]+ in func3\[^\r\n\]*\r\nBacktrace stopped: Cannot access memory at address 0x\[0-9a-f\]+" \
+ "second backtrace, with error message"
clean_restart ${binfile}
@@ -71,16 +55,9 @@ if ![runto breakpt] {
return -1
}
-set test_name "check mi -stack-info-depth command, first time"
-send_gdb "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-info-depth\"\n"
-gdb_expect {
- -re "\\^done,depth=\"4\"\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- pass $test_name
- }
- -re "\\^error,msg=\"Cannot access memory at address $hex\"\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- xfail $test_name
- }
-}
+gdb_test "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-info-depth\"" \
+ "\\^done,depth=\"4\"" \
+ "check mi -stack-info-depth command, first time"
gdb_test "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-info-depth\"" \
"\\^done,depth=\"4\"" \
@@ -92,16 +69,9 @@ if ![runto breakpt] {
return -1
}
-set test_name "check mi -stack-list-frames command, first time"
-send_gdb "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-list-frames\"\n"
-gdb_expect {
- -re "\\^done,stack=\\\[frame=\{level=\"0\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"breakpt\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\},frame=\{level=\"1\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func5\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\},frame=\{level=\"2\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func4\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\},frame=\{level=\"3\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func3\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\}\\\]\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- pass $test_name
- }
- -re "\\^error,msg=\"Cannot access memory at address $hex\"\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- xfail $test_name
- }
-}
+gdb_test "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-list-frames\"" \
+ "\\^done,stack=\\\[frame=\{level=\"0\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"breakpt\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\},frame=\{level=\"1\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func5\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\},frame=\{level=\"2\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func4\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\},frame=\{level=\"3\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func3\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\}\\\]" \
+ "check mi -stack-list-frames command, first time"
gdb_test "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-list-frames\"" \
"\\^done,stack=\\\[frame=\{level=\"0\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"breakpt\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\},frame=\{level=\"1\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func5\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\},frame=\{level=\"2\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func4\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\},frame=\{level=\"3\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func3\",file=\"\[^\"\]+\",fullname=\"\[^\"\]+\",line=\"${decimal}\"\}\\\]" \
@@ -45,27 +45,11 @@ if ![runto breakpt] {
# Use 'bt no-filters' here as the python filters will raise their own
# error during initialisation, the no-filters case is simpler.
-gdb_test "bt no-filters" "^bt no-filters\r\n#0 +$hex in func2 \\(\\)\r\nCannot access memory at address 0x\[0-9a-f\]+" \
+gdb_test "bt no-filters" "^bt no-filters\r\n#0 +$hex in func2 \\(\\)\r\nBacktrace stopped: Cannot access memory at address 0x\[0-9a-f\]+" \
"first backtrace, with error message"
-send_gdb "bt no-filters\n"
-gdb_expect {
- -re "^bt no-filters\r\n#0 +$hex in func2 \\(\\)\r\nCannot access memory at address 0x\[0-9a-f\]+\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- # Currently gdb will not display the error message associated with
- # the truncated backtrace after the first backtrace has been
- # completed. Ideally, we would do this. If this case is ever hit
- # then we have started to display the backtrace in all cases and
- # the xpass should becomd a pass, and the previous pass case below
- # should be removed, or changed to a fail.
- xpass "second backtrace, with error message"
- }
- -re "^bt no-filters\r\n#0 +$hex in func2 \\(\\)\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- pass "second backtrace, without error message"
- }
- timeout {
- fail "second backtrace (timeout)"
- }
-}
+gdb_test "bt no-filters" "^bt no-filters\r\n#0 +$hex in func2 \\(\\)\r\nBacktrace stopped: Cannot access memory at address 0x\[0-9a-f\]+" \
+ "second backtrace, with error message"
clean_restart ${binfile}
@@ -73,16 +57,9 @@ if ![runto breakpt] {
return -1
}
-set test_name "check mi -stack-info-depth command, first time"
-send_gdb "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-info-depth\"\n"
-gdb_expect {
- -re "\\^done,depth=\"1\"\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- pass $test_name
- }
- -re "\\^error,msg=\"Cannot access memory at address $hex\"\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- xfail $test_name
- }
-}
+gdb_test "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-info-depth\"" \
+ "\\^done,depth=\"1\"" \
+ "check mi -stack-info-depth command, first time"
gdb_test "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-info-depth\"" \
"\\^done,depth=\"1\"" \
@@ -94,17 +71,9 @@ if ![runto breakpt] {
return -1
}
-set test_name "check mi -stack-list-frames command, first time"
-send_gdb "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-list-frames\"\n"
-gdb_expect {
- -re "\\^done,stack=\\\[frame=\{level=\"0\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func2\"\}\\\]\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- pass $test_name
- }
- -re "\\^error,msg=\"Cannot access memory at address $hex\"\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- xfail $test_name
- }
-}
-
+gdb_test "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-list-frames\"" \
+ "\\^done,stack=\\\[frame=\{level=\"0\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func2\"\}\\\]" \
+ "check mi -stack-list-frames command, first time"
gdb_test "interpreter-exec mi \"-stack-list-frames\"" \
"\\^done,stack=\\\[frame=\{level=\"0\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"func2\"\}\\\]" \
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ SET (UNWIND_SAME_ID, "previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)")
one to unwind further. */
SET (UNWIND_NO_SAVED_PC, "frame did not save the PC")
+/* There was an error accessing memory while unwinding this frame. */
+SET (UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR, "memory error while unwinding")
+
#endif /* SET */
@@ -72,5 +75,5 @@ FIRST_ENTRY (UNWIND_NO_REASON)
#endif
#ifdef LAST_ENTRY
-LAST_ENTRY (UNWIND_NO_SAVED_PC)
+LAST_ENTRY (UNWIND_MEMORY_ERROR)
#endif