[v2,01/11] gdbserver: dump 'xx...x' in collect_register_as_string for unavailable register
Commit Message
Fix 'collect_register_as_string' so that unavailable registers are
dumped as 'xx...x' instead of arbitrary values. This gives the
opportunity that we can reuse 'collect_register_as_string' in
'registers_to_string' for additional code simplification.
Note: This patch is also included in the "A new target to debug Intel GPUs"
series at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2024-December/214029.html
Reviewed-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
---
gdbserver/regcache.cc | 25 +++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Comments
On 2024-12-30 05:49, Tankut Baris Aktemur wrote:
> Fix 'collect_register_as_string' so that unavailable registers are
> dumped as 'xx...x' instead of arbitrary values. This gives the
> opportunity that we can reuse 'collect_register_as_string' in
> 'registers_to_string' for additional code simplification.
>
> Note: This patch is also included in the "A new target to debug Intel GPUs"
> series at
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2024-December/214029.html
>
> Reviewed-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Can you please clarify in the commit message where the impact of the
change is? I initially assumed (don't know why) this was fixing some
debug output. I dug a bit, and it seems like it specifically changes
the behavior when sending expedited regs.
Otherwise, the code changes LGTM:
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Simon
On Monday, January 6, 2025 10:28 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2024-12-30 05:49, Tankut Baris Aktemur wrote:
> > Fix 'collect_register_as_string' so that unavailable registers are
> > dumped as 'xx...x' instead of arbitrary values. This gives the
> > opportunity that we can reuse 'collect_register_as_string' in
> > 'registers_to_string' for additional code simplification.
> >
> > Note: This patch is also included in the "A new target to debug Intel GPUs"
> > series at
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2024-December/214029.html
> >
> > Reviewed-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
>
> Can you please clarify in the commit message where the impact of the
> change is? I initially assumed (don't know why) this was fixing some
> debug output. I dug a bit, and it seems like it specifically changes
> the behavior when sending expedited regs.
Yes. I updated the commit message to include this information and pushed.
Thank you.
-Baris
> Otherwise, the code changes LGTM:
>
> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
>
> Simon
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Sean Fennelly, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Tiffany Doon Silva
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
@@ -209,24 +209,13 @@ find_register_by_number (const struct target_desc *tdesc, int n)
void
registers_to_string (struct regcache *regcache, char *buf)
{
- unsigned char *registers = regcache->registers;
const struct target_desc *tdesc = regcache->tdesc;
for (int i = 0; i < tdesc->reg_defs.size (); ++i)
{
- if (regcache->register_status[i] == REG_VALID)
- {
- bin2hex (registers, buf, register_size (tdesc, i));
- buf += register_size (tdesc, i) * 2;
- }
- else
- {
- memset (buf, 'x', register_size (tdesc, i) * 2);
- buf += register_size (tdesc, i) * 2;
- }
- registers += register_size (tdesc, i);
+ collect_register_as_string (regcache, i, buf);
+ buf += register_size (tdesc, i) * 2;
}
- *buf = '\0';
}
void
@@ -492,7 +481,15 @@ regcache_raw_get_unsigned_by_name (struct regcache *regcache,
void
collect_register_as_string (struct regcache *regcache, int n, char *buf)
{
- bin2hex (register_data (regcache, n), buf);
+ int reg_size = register_size (regcache->tdesc, n);
+
+ if (regcache->get_register_status (n) == REG_VALID)
+ bin2hex (register_data (regcache, n), buf);
+ else
+ memset (buf, 'x', reg_size * 2);
+
+ buf += reg_size * 2;
+ *buf = '\0';
}
void