[pushed/obv] Move comment in gdb/dwarf2read.c::dwarf2_physname

Message ID 1517832913-72299-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com
State New, archived
Headers

Commit Message

Joel Brobecker Feb. 5, 2018, 12:15 p.m. UTC
  Hello,

This commit just moves a comment right next to where it is actually
relevant. No actual code change.

gdb/ChangeLog:

        * dwarf2read.c (dwarf2_physname): Move commment.

Tested by rebuilding GDB, and pushed to master

Thank you!,
  

Patch

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index b341da9..7850982 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ 
+2018-02-05  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
+
+	* dwarf2read.c (dwarf2_physname): Move commment.
+
 2018-02-01  Leszek Swirski  <leszeks@google.com>
 
 	* varobj.c (varobj_formatted_print_options): Allow recursive
diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2read.c b/gdb/dwarf2read.c
index 51d0f39..d651725 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2read.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2read.c
@@ -11141,14 +11141,6 @@  dwarf2_physname (const char *name, struct die_info *die, struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
   gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> demangled;
   if (mangled != NULL)
     {
-      /* Use DMGL_RET_DROP for C++ template functions to suppress their return
-	 type.  It is easier for GDB users to search for such functions as
-	 `name(params)' than `long name(params)'.  In such case the minimal
-	 symbol names do not match the full symbol names but for template
-	 functions there is never a need to look up their definition from their
-	 declaration so the only disadvantage remains the minimal symbol
-	 variant `long name(params)' does not have the proper inferior type.
-	 */
 
       if (cu->language == language_go)
 	{
@@ -11158,6 +11150,14 @@  dwarf2_physname (const char *name, struct die_info *die, struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
 	}
       else
 	{
+	  /* Use DMGL_RET_DROP for C++ template functions to suppress
+	     their return type.  It is easier for GDB users to search
+	     for such functions as `name(params)' than `long name(params)'.
+	     In such case the minimal symbol names do not match the full
+	     symbol names but for template functions there is never a need
+	     to look up their definition from their declaration so
+	     the only disadvantage remains the minimal symbol variant
+	     `long name(params)' does not have the proper inferior type.  */
 	  demangled.reset (gdb_demangle (mangled,
 					 (DMGL_PARAMS | DMGL_ANSI
 					  | DMGL_RET_DROP)));