[3/3] Run dw2-var-zero-addr.exp with --readnow
Commit Message
This patch is to extend dw2-var-zero-add.exp to test the case that
partial symtabl is not used while full symtab is used, in order to
cover the changes in patch 2/3. This patch restarts GDB with
--readnow and does the same test again.
gdb/testsuite:
2014-08-20 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* gdb.dwarf2/dw2-var-zero-addr.exp: Move test into new proc test.
Invoke test. Restart GDB with --readnow and invoke test again.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-var-zero-addr.exp | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Comments
Yao Qi writes:
> This patch is to extend dw2-var-zero-add.exp to test the case that
> partial symtabl is not used while full symtab is used, in order to
> cover the changes in patch 2/3. This patch restarts GDB with
> --readnow and does the same test again.
>
> gdb/testsuite:
>
> 2014-08-20 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
>
> * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-var-zero-addr.exp: Move test into new proc test.
> Invoke test. Restart GDB with --readnow and invoke test again.
> ---
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-var-zero-addr.exp | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-var-zero-addr.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-var-zero-addr.exp
> index 462a5f8..5e1732b 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-var-zero-addr.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-var-zero-addr.exp
> @@ -26,6 +26,20 @@ if [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp ${testfile} \
> return -1
> }
>
> -# FAIL was: = (int *) 0x0
> -# Such DIE record can be produced using: gcc -fdata-sections -Wl,-gc-sections
> -gdb_test "print &var" {No symbol "var" in current context\.}
> +proc test { } {
> + # FAIL was: = (int *) 0x0
> + # Such DIE record can be produced using: gcc -fdata-sections -Wl,-gc-sections
> + gdb_test "print &var" {No symbol "var" in current context\.}
> +}
> +
> +test
> +
> +global GDBFLAGS
This global is unnecessary.
Otherwise the patch is fine by me.
[I kinda wonder whether the name "test" should be slightly more
descriptive, but I guess I'm ok with it as is.]
> +set saved_gdbflags $GDBFLAGS
> +set GDBFLAGS "$GDBFLAGS --readnow"
> +clean_restart ${binfile}
> +set GDBFLAGS $saved_gdbflags
> +
> +with_test_prefix "readnow" {
> + test
> +}
Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
> > +global GDBFLAGS
>
> This global is unnecessary.
> Otherwise the patch is fine by me.
It is removed from the updated patch. Pushed in.
@@ -26,6 +26,20 @@ if [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp ${testfile} \
return -1
}
-# FAIL was: = (int *) 0x0
-# Such DIE record can be produced using: gcc -fdata-sections -Wl,-gc-sections
-gdb_test "print &var" {No symbol "var" in current context\.}
+proc test { } {
+ # FAIL was: = (int *) 0x0
+ # Such DIE record can be produced using: gcc -fdata-sections -Wl,-gc-sections
+ gdb_test "print &var" {No symbol "var" in current context\.}
+}
+
+test
+
+global GDBFLAGS
+set saved_gdbflags $GDBFLAGS
+set GDBFLAGS "$GDBFLAGS --readnow"
+clean_restart ${binfile}
+set GDBFLAGS $saved_gdbflags
+
+with_test_prefix "readnow" {
+ test
+}