gdb: add a new build_id_equal function
Checks
Commit Message
Add two versions of a new function build_id_equal which can be used to
compare build-ids, then make use of these functions in GDB. It seems
better to have a specific function for the task of comparing build-ids
rather than having a length check followed by a memcmp call.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
---
gdb/build-id.c | 3 +--
gdb/build-id.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/exec.c | 6 ++----
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
base-commit: 868883583e7520ff1bd99fcb224d2b33a990edff
Comments
Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> writes:
> Add two versions of a new function build_id_equal which can be used to
> compare build-ids, then make use of these functions in GDB. It seems
> better to have a specific function for the task of comparing build-ids
> rather than having a length check followed by a memcmp call.
>
> There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
The initial version of this patch conflicts with the filename styling
patch that I just pushed to master.
Here's an updated version of the build-id patch, no real changes, just
resolved the merge conflict.
Thanks,
Andrew
---
commit 52a37959dfc8633d47e5aa18458d3bbf3dd53fb9
Author: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Date: Mon May 6 19:54:27 2024 +0100
gdb: add a new build_id_equal function
Add two versions of a new function build_id_equal which can be used to
compare build-ids, then make use of these functions in GDB. It seems
better to have a specific function for the task of comparing build-ids
rather than having a length check followed by a memcmp call.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
diff --git a/gdb/build-id.c b/gdb/build-id.c
index 659801b0865..41667d5e5cf 100644
--- a/gdb/build-id.c
+++ b/gdb/build-id.c
@@ -63,8 +63,7 @@ build_id_verify (bfd *abfd, size_t check_len, const bfd_byte *check)
warning (_("File \"%ps\" has no build-id, file skipped"),
styled_string (file_name_style.style (),
bfd_get_filename (abfd)));
- else if (found->size != check_len
- || memcmp (found->data, check, found->size) != 0)
+ else if (!build_id_equal (found, check_len, check))
warning (_("File \"%ps\" has a different build-id, file skipped"),
styled_string (file_name_style.style (),
bfd_get_filename (abfd)));
diff --git a/gdb/build-id.h b/gdb/build-id.h
index 15bd8a964dc..c5f20f8782e 100644
--- a/gdb/build-id.h
+++ b/gdb/build-id.h
@@ -70,4 +70,30 @@ build_id_to_string (const bfd_build_id *build_id)
return bin2hex (build_id->data, build_id->size);
}
+/* Compare the content of two build-ids. One build-id (A) is passed as a
+ build-id pointer, while the second is passed using BUILD_ID_LEN and
+ BUILD_ID_DATA. Return true if the build-ids match, otherwise false. */
+
+static inline bool
+build_id_equal (const bfd_build_id *a, const bfd_size_type build_id_len,
+ const bfd_byte *build_id_data)
+{
+ gdb_assert (a != nullptr);
+ gdb_assert (build_id_data != nullptr);
+
+ return (a->size == build_id_len
+ && memcmp (a->data, build_id_data, a->size) == 0);
+}
+
+/* Like the above, but take two build-id pointers A and B. */
+
+static inline bool
+build_id_equal (const bfd_build_id *a, const bfd_build_id *b)
+{
+ gdb_assert (a != nullptr);
+ gdb_assert (b != nullptr);
+
+ return build_id_equal (a, b->size, b->data);
+}
+
#endif /* BUILD_ID_H */
diff --git a/gdb/exec.c b/gdb/exec.c
index 3d392b198a1..88915260d60 100644
--- a/gdb/exec.c
+++ b/gdb/exec.c
@@ -253,10 +253,8 @@ validate_exec_file (int from_tty)
if (target_exec_file_build_id != nullptr)
{
- if (exec_file_build_id->size == target_exec_file_build_id->size
- && memcmp (exec_file_build_id->data,
- target_exec_file_build_id->data,
- exec_file_build_id->size) == 0)
+ if (build_id_equal (exec_file_build_id,
+ target_exec_file_build_id))
{
/* Match. */
return;
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> writes:
Andrew> The initial version of this patch conflicts with the filename styling
Andrew> patch that I just pushed to master.
Happens all the time.
Andrew> Here's an updated version of the build-id patch, no real changes, just
Andrew> resolved the merge conflict.
Looks good.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Tom
Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> writes:
>>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Andrew> The initial version of this patch conflicts with the filename styling
> Andrew> patch that I just pushed to master.
>
> Happens all the time.
>
> Andrew> Here's an updated version of the build-id patch, no real changes, just
> Andrew> resolved the merge conflict.
>
> Looks good.
> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Pushed.
Thanks,
Andrew
@@ -62,8 +62,7 @@ build_id_verify (bfd *abfd, size_t check_len, const bfd_byte *check)
if (found == NULL)
warning (_("File \"%s\" has no build-id, file skipped"),
bfd_get_filename (abfd));
- else if (found->size != check_len
- || memcmp (found->data, check, found->size) != 0)
+ else if (!build_id_equal (found, check_len, check))
warning (_("File \"%s\" has a different build-id, file skipped"),
bfd_get_filename (abfd));
else
@@ -70,4 +70,30 @@ build_id_to_string (const bfd_build_id *build_id)
return bin2hex (build_id->data, build_id->size);
}
+/* Compare the content of two build-ids. One build-id (A) is passed as a
+ build-id pointer, while the second is passed using BUILD_ID_LEN and
+ BUILD_ID_DATA. Return true if the build-ids match, otherwise false. */
+
+static inline bool
+build_id_equal (const bfd_build_id *a, const bfd_size_type build_id_len,
+ const bfd_byte *build_id_data)
+{
+ gdb_assert (a != nullptr);
+ gdb_assert (build_id_data != nullptr);
+
+ return (a->size == build_id_len
+ && memcmp (a->data, build_id_data, a->size) == 0);
+}
+
+/* Like the above, but take two build-id pointers A and B. */
+
+static inline bool
+build_id_equal (const bfd_build_id *a, const bfd_build_id *b)
+{
+ gdb_assert (a != nullptr);
+ gdb_assert (b != nullptr);
+
+ return build_id_equal (a, b->size, b->data);
+}
+
#endif /* BUILD_ID_H */
@@ -253,10 +253,8 @@ validate_exec_file (int from_tty)
if (target_exec_file_build_id != nullptr)
{
- if (exec_file_build_id->size == target_exec_file_build_id->size
- && memcmp (exec_file_build_id->data,
- target_exec_file_build_id->data,
- exec_file_build_id->size) == 0)
+ if (build_id_equal (exec_file_build_id,
+ target_exec_file_build_id))
{
/* Match. */
return;