Properly parse invariant &MEM addresses in the GIMPLE FE
Commit Message
Currently the frontend rejects those addresses as not lvalues
because the C frontend doens't expect MEM_REF or TARGET_MEM_REF
to appear (but they would be valid lvalues there). The following
fixes that by amending lvalue_p.
The change also makes the dumping of the source of the testcase
valid for the GIMPLE FE by not eliding the '&' when dumping
string literals.
Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Joseph, is the C frontend change OK?
Thanks,
Richard.
2021-10-06 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
gcc/c/
* c-typeck.c (lvalue_p): Also allow MEM_REF and TARGET_MEM_REF.
gcc/
* tree-pretty-print.c (dump_generic_node): Do not elide
printing '&' when dumping with -gimple.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/gimplefe-47.c: New testcase.
---
gcc/c/c-typeck.c | 4 ++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gimplefe-47.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gcc/tree-pretty-print.c | 7 +++++--
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gimplefe-47.c
Comments
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Currently the frontend rejects those addresses as not lvalues
> because the C frontend doens't expect MEM_REF or TARGET_MEM_REF
> to appear (but they would be valid lvalues there). The following
> fixes that by amending lvalue_p.
>
> The change also makes the dumping of the source of the testcase
> valid for the GIMPLE FE by not eliding the '&' when dumping
> string literals.
>
> Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> Joseph, is the C frontend change OK?
Yes.
@@ -4968,6 +4968,10 @@ lvalue_p (const_tree ref)
case STRING_CST:
return true;
+ case MEM_REF:
+ case TARGET_MEM_REF:
+ /* MEM_REFs can appear from -fgimple parsing or folding, so allow them
+ here as well. */
case INDIRECT_REF:
case ARRAY_REF:
case VAR_DECL:
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-fgimple" } */
+
+char * begfield (int tab, char * ptr, char * lim, int sword, int schar);
+
+int __GIMPLE (ssa)
+main ()
+{
+ char * lim;
+ char * s;
+ char * _1;
+
+ __BB(2):
+ _1 = begfield (58, ":ab", &__MEM <char[4]> ((void *)&":ab" + _Literal
+(void *) 3), 1, 1);
+ if (_1 != _Literal (char *) &__MEM <char[4]> ((void *)&":ab" + _Literal (void *) 2))
+ goto __BB3;
+ else
+ goto __BB4;
+
+ __BB(3):
+ __builtin_abort ();
+
+ __BB(4):
+ __builtin_exit (0);
+}
+
@@ -2888,10 +2888,13 @@ dump_generic_node (pretty_printer *pp, tree node, int spc, dump_flags_t flags,
case PREDECREMENT_EXPR:
case PREINCREMENT_EXPR:
case INDIRECT_REF:
- if (TREE_CODE (node) == ADDR_EXPR
+ if (!(flags & TDF_GIMPLE)
+ && TREE_CODE (node) == ADDR_EXPR
&& (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 0)) == STRING_CST
|| TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 0)) == FUNCTION_DECL))
- ; /* Do not output '&' for strings and function pointers. */
+ /* Do not output '&' for strings and function pointers when not
+ dumping GIMPLE FE syntax. */
+ ;
else
pp_string (pp, op_symbol (node));