Fix typo in gimple_fold_partial_load_store_mem_ref

Message ID f1d78b22-e5e9-5104-a3aa-750d8bb6cba2@linux.ibm.com
State Committed
Commit 928bc5b863f126189753e45ef45a40265ae028c5
Headers
Series Fix typo in gimple_fold_partial_load_store_mem_ref |

Commit Message

Kewen.Lin Nov. 16, 2022, 7:29 a.m. UTC
  Hi,

As Robin spotted, my recent commit r13-3716 caused an ICE
on s390 if vector access with length is enabled there (his
patch for the enablement hasn't been committed yet).  The
failure is caused by one stupid typo, the bias on s390 is
-1, so the assertion should use tree_fits_shwi_p rather
than tree_fits_uhwi_p.  Thanks for Robin's catching.

I just reproduced the ICE and verified the fix worked fine
with a cross build, the optimized dump against the test case
gcc.target/powerpc/pr107412.c looked expected.

Is it ok for trunk?

BR,
Kewen
-----
gcc/ChangeLog:

	* gimple-fold.cc (gimple_fold_partial_load_store_mem_ref): Use
	tree_fits_shwi_p rather than tree_fits_uhwi_p as bias is signed.
---
 gcc/gimple-fold.cc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
2.25.1
  

Comments

Richard Biener Nov. 16, 2022, 3:36 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 8:29 AM Kewen.Lin <linkw@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As Robin spotted, my recent commit r13-3716 caused an ICE
> on s390 if vector access with length is enabled there (his
> patch for the enablement hasn't been committed yet).  The
> failure is caused by one stupid typo, the bias on s390 is
> -1, so the assertion should use tree_fits_shwi_p rather
> than tree_fits_uhwi_p.  Thanks for Robin's catching.
>
> I just reproduced the ICE and verified the fix worked fine
> with a cross build, the optimized dump against the test case
> gcc.target/powerpc/pr107412.c looked expected.
>
> Is it ok for trunk?

OK.

> BR,
> Kewen
> -----
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * gimple-fold.cc (gimple_fold_partial_load_store_mem_ref): Use
>         tree_fits_shwi_p rather than tree_fits_uhwi_p as bias is signed.
> ---
>  gcc/gimple-fold.cc | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
> index 0a212e6d0d4..f8a1875ea3e 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
> +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
> @@ -5392,7 +5392,7 @@ gimple_fold_partial_load_store_mem_ref (gcall *call, tree vectype, bool mask_p)
>         return NULL_TREE;
>        unsigned int nargs = gimple_call_num_args (call);
>        tree bias = gimple_call_arg (call, nargs - 1);
> -      gcc_assert (tree_fits_uhwi_p (bias));
> +      gcc_assert (tree_fits_shwi_p (bias));
>        tree biased_len = int_const_binop (MINUS_EXPR, basic_len, bias);
>        unsigned int len = tree_to_uhwi (biased_len);
>        unsigned int vect_len
> --
> 2.25.1
  

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
index 0a212e6d0d4..f8a1875ea3e 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
@@ -5392,7 +5392,7 @@  gimple_fold_partial_load_store_mem_ref (gcall *call, tree vectype, bool mask_p)
 	return NULL_TREE;
       unsigned int nargs = gimple_call_num_args (call);
       tree bias = gimple_call_arg (call, nargs - 1);
-      gcc_assert (tree_fits_uhwi_p (bias));
+      gcc_assert (tree_fits_shwi_p (bias));
       tree biased_len = int_const_binop (MINUS_EXPR, basic_len, bias);
       unsigned int len = tree_to_uhwi (biased_len);
       unsigned int vect_len