[v2] fortran: Detect duplicate unlimited polymorphic types [PR103662]

From e53ecc979ec2a798626eb94c60d18b015d6f52e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mikael Morin <mikael@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:04:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2] fortran: Detect duplicate unlimited polymorphic types
 [PR103662]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

This fixes a type-based alias analysis issue with unlimited polymorphic
class descriptors (types behind class(*)) causing data initialisation to
be removed by optimization.

The fortran front-end may create multiple declarations for types, for
example if a type is redeclared in each program unit it is used in.
To avoid optimization seeing them as non-aliasing, a list of derived
types is created at resolution time, and used at translation to set
the same TYPE_CANONICAL type for each duplicate type declaration.

This mechanism didn’t work for unlimited polymorphic descriptors types,
as there is a short-circuit return skipping all the resolution handling
for them, including the type registration.

This change adds type registration at the short-circuit return, and
updates type comparison to handle specifically unlimited polymorphic
fake symbols, class descriptor types and virtual table types.

The test, which exhibited mismatching dynamic types had to be fixed as
well.

	PR fortran/103662

gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

	* interface.cc (gfc_compare_derived_types): Support comparing
	unlimited polymorphic fake symbols.  Recursively compare class
	descriptor types and virtual table types.
	* resolve.cc (resolve_fl_derived): Add type to the types list
	on unlimited polymorphic short-circuit return.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03 (foo): Separate
	bind(c) and sequence checks to...
	(foo_bc, foo_sq): ... two different procedures.
	(main, foo*): Change type declarations so that type name,
	component name, and either bind(c) or sequence attribute match
	between the main type declarations and the procedure type
	declarations.
	(toplevel): Add optimization dump checks.

Co-Authored-By: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
---
 gcc/fortran/interface.cc                      | 19 +++++--
 gcc/fortran/resolve.cc                        |  5 +-
 .../gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03   | 56 +++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/interface.cc b/gcc/fortran/interface.cc
index 000a530cba4..7ed6e13711f 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/interface.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/interface.cc
@@ -618,6 +618,14 @@  gfc_compare_derived_types (gfc_symbol *derived1, gfc_symbol *derived2)
   if (!derived1 || !derived2)
     gfc_internal_error ("gfc_compare_derived_types: invalid derived type");
 
+  if (derived1->attr.unlimited_polymorphic
+      && derived2->attr.unlimited_polymorphic)
+    return true;
+
+  if (derived1->attr.unlimited_polymorphic
+      != derived2->attr.unlimited_polymorphic)
+    return false;
+
   /* Compare UNION types specially.  */
   if (derived1->attr.flavor == FL_UNION || derived2->attr.flavor == FL_UNION)
     return compare_union_types (derived1, derived2);
@@ -630,10 +638,11 @@  gfc_compare_derived_types (gfc_symbol *derived1, gfc_symbol *derived2)
       && strcmp (derived1->module, derived2->module) == 0)
     return true;
 
-  /* Compare type via the rules of the standard.  Both types must have
-     the SEQUENCE or BIND(C) attribute to be equal. STRUCTUREs are special
-     because they can be anonymous; therefore two structures with different
-     names may be equal.  */
+  /* Compare type via the rules of the standard.  Both types must have the
+     SEQUENCE or BIND(C) attribute to be equal.  We also compare types
+     recursively if they are class descriptors types or virtual tables types.
+     STRUCTUREs are special because they can be anonymous; therefore two
+     structures with different names may be equal.  */
 
   /* Compare names, but not for anonymous types such as UNION or MAP.  */
   if (!is_anonymous_dt (derived1) && !is_anonymous_dt (derived2)
@@ -646,6 +655,8 @@  gfc_compare_derived_types (gfc_symbol *derived1, gfc_symbol *derived2)
 
   if (!(derived1->attr.sequence && derived2->attr.sequence)
       && !(derived1->attr.is_bind_c && derived2->attr.is_bind_c)
+      && !(derived1->attr.is_class && derived2->attr.is_class)
+      && !(derived1->attr.vtype && derived2->attr.vtype)
       && !(derived1->attr.pdt_type && derived2->attr.pdt_type))
     return false;
 
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc b/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc
index 21c8797c938..e7a4b79b40c 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.cc
@@ -15150,7 +15150,10 @@  resolve_fl_derived (gfc_symbol *sym)
 
       /* Nothing more to do for unlimited polymorphic entities.  */
       if (data->ts.u.derived->attr.unlimited_polymorphic)
-	return true;
+	{
+	  add_dt_to_dt_list (sym);
+	  return true;
+	}
       else if (vptr->ts.u.derived == NULL)
 	{
 	  gfc_symbol *vtab = gfc_find_derived_vtab (data->ts.u.derived);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03
index 075d6d727e2..780d68cdd87 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ 
 ! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-dse-details" }
 !
 ! Check that pointer assignments allowed by F2003:C717
 ! work and check null initialization of CLASS(*) pointers.
@@ -7,20 +8,31 @@ 
 !
 program main
   interface
-    subroutine foo(z)
+    subroutine foo_bc(z)
       class(*), pointer, intent(in) :: z
-    end subroutine foo
+    end subroutine foo_bc
+    subroutine foo_sq(z)
+      class(*), pointer, intent(in) :: z
+    end subroutine foo_sq
   end interface
+  type, bind(c) :: bc
+    integer :: i
+  end type bc
   type sq
     sequence
-    integer :: i
+    integer :: k
   end type sq
+  type(bc), target :: w
   type(sq), target :: x
   class(*), pointer :: y, z
-  x%i = 42
+  w%i = 23
+  y => w
+  z => y ! unlimited => unlimited allowed
+  call foo_bc(z)
+  x%k = 42
   y => x
   z => y ! unlimited => unlimited allowed
-  call foo (z)
+  call foo_sq(z)
   call bar
 contains
   subroutine bar
@@ -33,21 +45,31 @@  contains
 
 end program main
 
-
-subroutine foo(tgt)
+subroutine foo_bc(tgt)
   use iso_c_binding
   class(*), pointer, intent(in) :: tgt
-  type, bind(c) :: s
-    integer (c_int) :: k
-  end type s
-  type t
+  type, bind(c) :: bc
+    integer (c_int) :: i
+  end type bc
+  type(bc), pointer :: ptr1
+  ptr1 => tgt ! bind(c) => unlimited allowed
+  if (ptr1%i .ne. 23) STOP 2
+end subroutine foo_bc
+
+subroutine foo_sq(tgt)
+  class(*), pointer, intent(in) :: tgt
+  type sq
     sequence
     integer :: k
-  end type t
-  type(s), pointer :: ptr1
-  type(t), pointer :: ptr2
-  ptr1 => tgt ! bind(c) => unlimited allowed
-  if (ptr1%k .ne. 42) STOP 2
+  end type sq
+  type(sq), pointer :: ptr2
   ptr2 => tgt ! sequence type => unlimited allowed
   if (ptr2%k .ne. 42) STOP 3
-end subroutine foo
+end subroutine foo_sq
+
+! PR fortran/103662
+! We used to produce multiple independant types for the unlimited polymorphic
+! descriptors (types for class(*)) which caused stores to them to be seen as
+! useless.
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Deleted dead store: z._data = &w" "dse1" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Deleted dead store: z._data = &x" "dse1" } }
-- 
2.35.1