From patchwork Mon Apr 8 09:23:05 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Kewen.Lin" X-Patchwork-Id: 88154 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119213864830 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:24:04 +0000 (GMT) X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76F2385841E for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:23:15 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C76F2385841E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org C76F2385841E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712568199; cv=none; b=sk3DfS2WvbFP/f9h6tpjFadZ7h66MvCq/emqK21VNLKqL/vDpAne4VfEmSxNk/h7pV3YWc0VRRTZ0gSRv4pJEoTK4lpJdFT4+5FzRusuDg1+tQQ3EZaufEN7KVFT27+qS1qjE4w6KnPByE4LG5ZFAcRqkDs4V0KorEaIbNFiZW4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712568199; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QGAojCdZleuQzB6+ICcBQs0LBSIOSU61Yh/Pq4FK7Xs=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From:Subject; b=KeeMaKXrg4PZHetiK1rR7OkgugkZ2qYJug4RIh2Qk4EsGXgSIchgxvnKYfad+EOF4wlNRh5LxB9R6RkvTpJqVBIFhYl3wAlF+GrAA9D8ntH0wWkV5npW3jDwWKdM1KmMiaDTHLElxWFPgrI6AxPPfrp5a3qRD0QRxC8a6R0S1VM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from pps.filterd (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 43897NjL014903; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:23:14 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : to : cc : from : subject : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=K15VTY8ZdbG3AIDFIuyKsCx3dGffqCkFSVukUQeiEPM=; b=BwB4BtIFcYy9JjGN3GsTcIYzz0uEpwx08ObfuZipy8utKs5zJDPKoGvlPZPs4sG1J0NV d7qm0a1YU9b8CSVNYKrGmRDPFCWSaj44SMvScBduLAorSHVWgi+7cRFuZmx2SNDBKl/5 IcoG2JvRUthtE90zukE+AMvhaeB7tux6UULrOJWPJmtlpawQkgAvvJE+QQnG07Qwc1eG XbPQvHKY8+6gww3TjTdN0XTk6YAMUd5T6WfyZdDvbjFw5/1AJphVtdonQ9rzxR/Ct4Dq K83vKuYbzUErYcK2X5rh863Y5C4BI3IxZ5eLZtyBrY39JjB3E6DQ4gPEZBDB5jj/HyKp Hw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3xcdnsr1a4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 08 Apr 2024 09:23:14 +0000 Received: from m0353726.ppops.net (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 4389NDsB011088; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:23:13 GMT Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3xcdnsr19s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 08 Apr 2024 09:23:13 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 4388gYmr029889; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:23:12 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.229]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3xbj7ky5jj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 08 Apr 2024 09:23:12 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 4389N8ms39190904 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:23:10 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6599320049; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:23:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876782004B; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:23:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.197.228.82] (unknown [9.197.228.82]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:23:06 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:23:05 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Content-Language: en-US To: GCC Patches Cc: Richard Biener , j@lambda.is, Peter Bergner , Segher Boessenkool From: "Kewen.Lin" Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Add profile_update_atomic check to gcov-20.c [PR114614] X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: iw6OwgSfZS0G6tTSd37WS9SOkqcuUdkD X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 6Q9uAYdcyFWSdpsHT9Tl7-IOOpJsVIEg X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-04-08_07,2024-04-05_02,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1011 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=937 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2404010000 definitions=main-2404080072 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org Hi, As PR114614 shows, the newly added test case gcov-20.c by commit r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 failed on targets which do not support atomic profile update, there would be a message like: warning: target does not support atomic profile update, single mode is selected Since the test case adopts -fprofile-update=atomic, it requires effective target check profile_update_atomic, this patch is to add the check accordingly. Tested well on x86_64-redhat-linux, powerpc64-linux-gnu P8/P9 and powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9/P10. Is it ok for trunk? BR, Kewen ----- PR testsuite/114614 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c: Add effective target check profile_update_atomic. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) -- 2.43.0 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c index 215faffc980..ca8c12aad2b 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ /* { dg-options "-fcondition-coverage -ftest-coverage -fprofile-update=atomic" } */ /* { dg-do run { target native } } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target profile_update_atomic } */ /* Some side effect to stop branches from being pruned */ int x = 0;