[V2] tree-optimization/104288 - Register non-null side effects properly.

Message ID d1f8f96e-2f34-b2fe-b45b-76e2f1dd8ed9@redhat.com
State New
Headers
Series [V2] tree-optimization/104288 - Register non-null side effects properly. |

Commit Message

Andrew MacLeod Feb. 8, 2022, 8:58 p.m. UTC
  On 2/8/22 03:32, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 2:33 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> On 2/7/22 09:29, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>> I have a proposal for PR 104288.
>>>
>>> ALL patches (in sequence) bootstrap on their own and each cause no
>>> regressions.
>> I've been continuing to work with this towards the GCC13 solution for
>> statement side effects.  And There is another possibility we could
>> pursue which is less intrusive
>>
>> I adapted the portions of patch 2/4 which process nonnull, but changes
>> it from being in the nonnull class to being in the cache.
>>
>> THe main difference is it continues to use a single bit, just changing
>> all uses of it to *always* mean its non-null on exit to the block.
>>
>> Range-on-entry is changed to only check dominator blocks, and
>> range_of_expr doesn't check the bit at all.. in both ranger and the cache.
>>
>> When we are doing the block walk and process side effects, the on-entry
>> *cache* range for the block is adjusted to be non-null instead.   The
>> statements which precede this stmt have already been processed, and all
>> remaining statements in this block will now pick up this new non-value
>> from the on-entry cache.  This should be perfectly safe.
>>
>> The final tweak is when range_of_expr is looking the def block, it
>> normally does not have an on entry cache value.  (the def is in the
>> block, so there is no entry cache value).  It now checks to see if we
>> have set one, which can only happen when we have been doing the
>> statement walk and set the on-entry cache with  a non-null value.  This
>> allows us to pick up the non-null range in the def block too... (once we
>> have passed a statement which set nonnull of course).
>>
>> THis patch provides much less change to trunk, and is probably a better
>> approach as its closer to what is going to happen in GCC13.
>>
>> Im still working with it, so the patch isnt fully refined yet... but it
>> bootstraps and passes all test with no regressions.  And passes the new
>> tests too.   I figured I would mention this before you look to hard at
>> the other patchset.    the GCC11 patch doesn't change.
>>
>> Let me know if you prefer this.... I think I do :-)  less churn, and
>> closer to end state.
> Yes, I very much prefer this - some comments to the other patches
> still apply to this one.  Like using get_nonnull_args and probably
> adding a bail-out to computing ranges from stmts that can throw
> internally or have abnormal control flow (to not get into range-on-exit
> vs. normal vs. exceptional or abnormal edges).
>
> Richard.

with some minor performance tweaks, such as moving adjust_range() to the 
header so it can be inlined .

range-on-edge now applies the non-null from the src block if 
appropriate, not in range-on-exit.   That should resolve  the internal 
throwing statements I think.  and I have switched over to 
get_nonnull_args().

Bootstraps on build-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and passes all regressions.

OK for trunk, or did I miss something?

Andrew

PS. odd.. I haven't seen the git diff be wrong before, but it shows the 
ranger_cache::range_on_edge changes as being in 
gimple_cache::range_of_expr...  They are most definitely are not....   
and it applies/de-applies fine.. so its just an oddity I guess.
  

Comments

Richard Biener Feb. 9, 2022, 8:45 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 9:58 PM Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/8/22 03:32, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 2:33 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
> > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >> On 2/7/22 09:29, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >>> I have a proposal for PR 104288.
> >>>
> >>> ALL patches (in sequence) bootstrap on their own and each cause no
> >>> regressions.
> >> I've been continuing to work with this towards the GCC13 solution for
> >> statement side effects.  And There is another possibility we could
> >> pursue which is less intrusive
> >>
> >> I adapted the portions of patch 2/4 which process nonnull, but changes
> >> it from being in the nonnull class to being in the cache.
> >>
> >> THe main difference is it continues to use a single bit, just changing
> >> all uses of it to *always* mean its non-null on exit to the block.
> >>
> >> Range-on-entry is changed to only check dominator blocks, and
> >> range_of_expr doesn't check the bit at all.. in both ranger and the cache.
> >>
> >> When we are doing the block walk and process side effects, the on-entry
> >> *cache* range for the block is adjusted to be non-null instead.   The
> >> statements which precede this stmt have already been processed, and all
> >> remaining statements in this block will now pick up this new non-value
> >> from the on-entry cache.  This should be perfectly safe.
> >>
> >> The final tweak is when range_of_expr is looking the def block, it
> >> normally does not have an on entry cache value.  (the def is in the
> >> block, so there is no entry cache value).  It now checks to see if we
> >> have set one, which can only happen when we have been doing the
> >> statement walk and set the on-entry cache with  a non-null value.  This
> >> allows us to pick up the non-null range in the def block too... (once we
> >> have passed a statement which set nonnull of course).
> >>
> >> THis patch provides much less change to trunk, and is probably a better
> >> approach as its closer to what is going to happen in GCC13.
> >>
> >> Im still working with it, so the patch isnt fully refined yet... but it
> >> bootstraps and passes all test with no regressions.  And passes the new
> >> tests too.   I figured I would mention this before you look to hard at
> >> the other patchset.    the GCC11 patch doesn't change.
> >>
> >> Let me know if you prefer this.... I think I do :-)  less churn, and
> >> closer to end state.
> > Yes, I very much prefer this - some comments to the other patches
> > still apply to this one.  Like using get_nonnull_args and probably
> > adding a bail-out to computing ranges from stmts that can throw
> > internally or have abnormal control flow (to not get into range-on-exit
> > vs. normal vs. exceptional or abnormal edges).
> >
> > Richard.
>
> with some minor performance tweaks, such as moving adjust_range() to the
> header so it can be inlined .
>
> range-on-edge now applies the non-null from the src block if
> appropriate, not in range-on-exit.   That should resolve  the internal
> throwing statements I think.  and I have switched over to
> get_nonnull_args().
>
> Bootstraps on build-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and passes all regressions.
>
> OK for trunk, or did I miss something?

OK.

I do think there's some confusion about -fnon-call-exceptions.  The
comment

+  // Non-call exceptions mean we could throw in the middle of the
+  // block, so just punt on those for now.

also applies to regular exceptions, non-call vs. call EH just
adds the possibility of non-call stmts to throw.  I do not think that
value-range propagation needs to care about stmts that throw
in the middle of a block (which automatically means no EH edges
and thus !stmt_can_throw_internal).  When there are EH edges
then restrictions apply to both calls and non-calls that throw.

So whatever made those cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions
necessary should have shown a more general issue with EH.

That's something to look at, but not in the scope of this fix.

Richard.

> Andrew
>
> PS. odd.. I haven't seen the git diff be wrong before, but it shows the
> ranger_cache::range_on_edge changes as being in
> gimple_cache::range_of_expr...  They are most definitely are not....
> and it applies/de-applies fine.. so its just an oddity I guess.
>
  
Andrew MacLeod Feb. 9, 2022, 2:01 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2/9/22 03:45, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 9:58 PM Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 2/8/22 03:32, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 2:33 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
>>> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>>> On 2/7/22 09:29, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>>>> I have a proposal for PR 104288.
>>>>>
>>>>> ALL patches (in sequence) bootstrap on their own and each cause no
>>>>> regressions.
>>>> I've been continuing to work with this towards the GCC13 solution for
>>>> statement side effects.  And There is another possibility we could
>>>> pursue which is less intrusive
>>>>
>>>> I adapted the portions of patch 2/4 which process nonnull, but changes
>>>> it from being in the nonnull class to being in the cache.
>>>>
>>>> THe main difference is it continues to use a single bit, just changing
>>>> all uses of it to *always* mean its non-null on exit to the block.
>>>>
>>>> Range-on-entry is changed to only check dominator blocks, and
>>>> range_of_expr doesn't check the bit at all.. in both ranger and the cache.
>>>>
>>>> When we are doing the block walk and process side effects, the on-entry
>>>> *cache* range for the block is adjusted to be non-null instead.   The
>>>> statements which precede this stmt have already been processed, and all
>>>> remaining statements in this block will now pick up this new non-value
>>>> from the on-entry cache.  This should be perfectly safe.
>>>>
>>>> The final tweak is when range_of_expr is looking the def block, it
>>>> normally does not have an on entry cache value.  (the def is in the
>>>> block, so there is no entry cache value).  It now checks to see if we
>>>> have set one, which can only happen when we have been doing the
>>>> statement walk and set the on-entry cache with  a non-null value.  This
>>>> allows us to pick up the non-null range in the def block too... (once we
>>>> have passed a statement which set nonnull of course).
>>>>
>>>> THis patch provides much less change to trunk, and is probably a better
>>>> approach as its closer to what is going to happen in GCC13.
>>>>
>>>> Im still working with it, so the patch isnt fully refined yet... but it
>>>> bootstraps and passes all test with no regressions.  And passes the new
>>>> tests too.   I figured I would mention this before you look to hard at
>>>> the other patchset.    the GCC11 patch doesn't change.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if you prefer this.... I think I do :-)  less churn, and
>>>> closer to end state.
>>> Yes, I very much prefer this - some comments to the other patches
>>> still apply to this one.  Like using get_nonnull_args and probably
>>> adding a bail-out to computing ranges from stmts that can throw
>>> internally or have abnormal control flow (to not get into range-on-exit
>>> vs. normal vs. exceptional or abnormal edges).
>>>
>>> Richard.
>> with some minor performance tweaks, such as moving adjust_range() to the
>> header so it can be inlined .
>>
>> range-on-edge now applies the non-null from the src block if
>> appropriate, not in range-on-exit.   That should resolve  the internal
>> throwing statements I think.  and I have switched over to
>> get_nonnull_args().
>>
>> Bootstraps on build-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and passes all regressions.
>>
>> OK for trunk, or did I miss something?
> OK.
>
> I do think there's some confusion about -fnon-call-exceptions.  The
> comment
>
> +  // Non-call exceptions mean we could throw in the middle of the
> +  // block, so just punt on those for now.
>
> also applies to regular exceptions, non-call vs. call EH just
> adds the possibility of non-call stmts to throw.  I do not think that
> value-range propagation needs to care about stmts that throw
> in the middle of a block (which automatically means no EH edges
> and thus !stmt_can_throw_internal).  When there are EH edges
> then restrictions apply to both calls and non-calls that throw.
>
> So whatever made those cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions
> necessary should have shown a more general issue with EH.

its probably paranoid carry over from a few years ago when getting off 
the ground, combined with the non-null bit originally applying to the 
entire block.

With these changes, and adjusting the outgoing values only on 
non-abnormal/EH edge, I suspect they are no longer needed.  I will look 
at pulling them all out for the next release.



>
> That's something to look at, but not in the scope of this fix.
>
> Richard.
>
>> Andrew
>>
>> PS. odd.. I haven't seen the git diff be wrong before, but it shows the
>> ranger_cache::range_on_edge changes as being in
>> gimple_cache::range_of_expr...  They are most definitely are not....
>> and it applies/de-applies fine.. so its just an oddity I guess.
>>
  

Patch

From 2f38b3de7958d83dab383c73029aedbd108d8930 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 15:52:16 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Register non-null side effects properly.

This patch adjusts uses of nonnull to accurately reflect "somewhere in block".
It also adds the ability to register statement side effects within a block
for ranger which will apply for the rest of the block.

	PR tree-optimization/104288
	gcc/
	* gimple-range-cache.cc (non_null_ref::set_nonnull): New.
	(non_null_ref::adjust_range): Move to header.
	(ranger_cache::range_of_def): Don't check non-null.
	(ranger_cache::entry_range): Don't check non-null.
	(ranger_cache::range_on_edge): Check for nonnull on normal edges.
	(ranger_cache::update_to_nonnull): New.
        (non_null_loadstore): New.
        (ranger_cache::block_apply_nonnull): New.
	* ranger-cache.h (class non_null_ref): Update prototypes.
	(non_null_ref::adjust_range): Move to here and inline.
	(class ranger_cache): Update prototypes.
	* gimple-range-path.cc (path_range_query::range_defined_in_block): Do
	not search dominators.
	(path_range_query::adjust_for_non_null_uses): Ditto.
	* gimple-range.cc (gimple_ranger::range_of_expr): Check on-entry for
	def overrides.  Do not check nonnull.
	(gimple_ranger::range_on_entry): Check dominators for nonnull.
	(gimple_ranger::range_on_edge): Check for nonnull on normal edges..
	* gimple-range.cc (gimple_ranger::register_side_effects): New.
	* gimple-range.h (gimple_ranger::register_side_effects): New.
	* tree-vrp.cc (rvrp_folder::fold_stmt): Call register_side_effects.

	testsuite/gcc/
	* gcc.dg/pr104288.c: New.
---
 gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc       | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 gcc/gimple-range-cache.h        |  31 ++++++++
 gcc/gimple-range-path.cc        |   4 +-
 gcc/gimple-range.cc             |  27 ++++++-
 gcc/gimple-range.h              |   1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr104288.c |  23 ++++++
 gcc/tree-vrp.cc                 |   8 +-
 7 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr104288.c

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc b/gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc
index 16c881b13e1..613135266a4 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@  along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 #include "gimple-pretty-print.h"
 #include "gimple-range.h"
 #include "tree-cfg.h"
+#include "target.h"
+#include "attribs.h"
+#include "gimple-iterator.h"
+#include "gimple-walk.h"
 
 #define DEBUG_RANGE_CACHE (dump_file					\
 			   && (param_ranger_debug & RANGER_DEBUG_CACHE))
@@ -50,6 +54,21 @@  non_null_ref::~non_null_ref ()
   m_nn.release ();
 }
 
+// This routine will update NAME in BB to be nonnull if it is not already.
+// return TRUE if the update happens.
+
+bool
+non_null_ref::set_nonnull (basic_block bb, tree name)
+{
+  gcc_checking_assert (gimple_range_ssa_p (name)
+		       && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (name)));
+  // Only process when its not already set.
+  if (non_null_deref_p  (name, bb, false))
+    return false;
+  bitmap_set_bit (m_nn[SSA_NAME_VERSION (name)], bb->index);
+  return true;
+}
+
 // Return true if NAME has a non-null dereference in block bb.  If this is the
 // first query for NAME, calculate the summary first.
 // If SEARCH_DOM is true, the search the dominator tree as well.
@@ -87,35 +106,6 @@  non_null_ref::non_null_deref_p (tree name, basic_block bb, bool search_dom)
   return false;
 }
 
-// If NAME has a non-null dereference in block BB, adjust R with the
-// non-zero information from non_null_deref_p, and return TRUE.  If
-// SEARCH_DOM is true, non_null_deref_p should search the dominator tree.
-
-bool
-non_null_ref::adjust_range (irange &r, tree name, basic_block bb,
-			    bool search_dom)
-{
-  // Non-call exceptions mean we could throw in the middle of the
-  // block, so just punt on those for now.
-  if (cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions)
-    return false;
-
-  // We only care about the null / non-null property of pointers.
-  if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (name)))
-    return false;
-  if (r.undefined_p () || r.lower_bound () != 0 || r.upper_bound () == 0)
-    return false;
-  // Check if pointers have any non-null dereferences.
-  if (non_null_deref_p (name, bb, search_dom))
-    {
-      // Remove zero from the range.
-      unsigned prec = TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (name));
-      r.intersect (wi::one (prec), wi::max_value (prec, UNSIGNED));
-      return true;
-    }
-  return false;
-}
-
 // Allocate an populate the bitmap for NAME.  An ON bit for a block
 // index indicates there is a non-null reference in that block.  In
 // order to populate the bitmap, a quick run of all the immediate uses
@@ -1014,9 +1004,6 @@  ranger_cache::range_of_def (irange &r, tree name, basic_block bb)
       else
 	r = gimple_range_global (name);
     }
-
-  if (bb)
-    m_non_null.adjust_range (r, name, bb, false);
 }
 
 // Get the range of NAME as it occurs on entry to block BB.
@@ -1034,8 +1021,6 @@  ranger_cache::entry_range (irange &r, tree name, basic_block bb)
   // Otherwise pick up the best available global value.
   if (!m_on_entry.get_bb_range (r, name, bb))
     range_of_def (r, name);
-
-  m_non_null.adjust_range (r, name, bb, false);
 }
 
 // Get the range of NAME as it occurs on exit from block BB.
@@ -1089,6 +1074,9 @@  ranger_cache::range_of_expr (irange &r, tree name, gimple *stmt)
    if (gimple_range_ssa_p (expr))
     {
       exit_range (r, expr, e->src);
+      // If this is not an abnormal edge, check for a non-null exit.
+      if ((e->flags & (EDGE_EH | EDGE_ABNORMAL)) == 0)
+	m_non_null.adjust_range (r, expr, e->src, false);
       int_range_max edge_range;
       if (m_gori.outgoing_edge_range_p (edge_range, e, expr, *this))
 	r.intersect (edge_range);
@@ -1467,3 +1455,82 @@  ranger_cache::range_from_dom (irange &r, tree name, basic_block bb)
     }
   return true;
 }
+
+// This routine will update NAME in block BB to the nonnull state.
+// It will then update the on-entry cache for this block to be non-null
+// if it isn't already.
+
+void
+ranger_cache::update_to_nonnull (basic_block bb, tree name)
+{
+  tree type = TREE_TYPE (name);
+  if (gimple_range_ssa_p (name) && POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
+    {
+      m_non_null.set_nonnull (bb, name);
+      // Update the on-entry cache for BB to be non-zero.  Note this can set
+      // the on entry value in the DEF block, which can override the def.
+      int_range_max r;
+      exit_range (r, name, bb);
+      if (r.varying_p ())
+	{
+	  r.set_nonzero (type);
+	  m_on_entry.set_bb_range (name, bb, r);
+	}
+    }
+}
+
+// Adapted from infer_nonnull_range_by_dereference and check_loadstore
+// to process nonnull ssa_name OP in S.  DATA contains the ranger_cache.
+
+static bool
+non_null_loadstore (gimple *s, tree op, tree, void *data)
+{
+  if (TREE_CODE (op) == MEM_REF || TREE_CODE (op) == TARGET_MEM_REF)
+    {
+      /* Some address spaces may legitimately dereference zero.  */
+      addr_space_t as = TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE (op));
+      if (!targetm.addr_space.zero_address_valid (as))
+	{
+	  tree ssa = TREE_OPERAND (op, 0);
+	  basic_block bb = gimple_bb (s);
+	  ((ranger_cache *)data)->update_to_nonnull (bb, ssa);
+	}
+    }
+  return false;
+}
+
+// This routine is used during a block walk to move the state of non-null for
+// any operands on stmt S to nonnull.
+
+void
+ranger_cache::block_apply_nonnull (gimple *s)
+{
+  if (!flag_delete_null_pointer_checks)
+    return;
+  if (is_a<gphi *> (s))
+    return;
+  if (gimple_code (s) == GIMPLE_ASM || gimple_clobber_p (s))
+    return;
+  if (is_a<gcall *> (s))
+    {
+      tree fntype = gimple_call_fntype (s);
+      bitmap nonnullargs = get_nonnull_args (fntype);
+      // Process any non-null arguments
+      if (nonnullargs)
+	{
+	  basic_block bb = gimple_bb (s);
+	  for (unsigned i = 0; i < gimple_call_num_args (s); i++)
+	    {
+	      if (bitmap_empty_p (nonnullargs) || bitmap_bit_p (nonnullargs, i))
+		{
+		  tree op = gimple_call_arg (s, i);
+		  update_to_nonnull (bb, op);
+		}
+	    }
+	  BITMAP_FREE (nonnullargs);
+	}
+      // Fallthru and walk load/store ops now.
+    }
+  walk_stmt_load_store_ops (s, (void *)this, non_null_loadstore,
+			    non_null_loadstore);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range-cache.h b/gcc/gimple-range-cache.h
index b54b6882aa8..589b649da26 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-range-cache.h
+++ b/gcc/gimple-range-cache.h
@@ -36,12 +36,41 @@  public:
   bool non_null_deref_p (tree name, basic_block bb, bool search_dom = true);
   bool adjust_range (irange &r, tree name, basic_block bb,
 		     bool search_dom = true);
+  bool set_nonnull (basic_block bb, tree name);
 private:
   vec <bitmap> m_nn;
   void process_name (tree name);
   bitmap_obstack m_bitmaps;
 };
 
+// If NAME has a non-null dereference in block BB, adjust R with the
+// non-zero information from non_null_deref_p, and return TRUE.  If
+// SEARCH_DOM is true, non_null_deref_p should search the dominator tree.
+
+inline bool
+non_null_ref::adjust_range (irange &r, tree name, basic_block bb,
+			    bool search_dom)
+{
+  // Non-call exceptions mean we could throw in the middle of the
+  // block, so just punt on those for now.
+  if (cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions)
+    return false;
+  // We only care about the null / non-null property of pointers.
+  if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (name)))
+    return false;
+  if (r.undefined_p () || r.lower_bound () != 0 || r.upper_bound () == 0)
+    return false;
+  // Check if pointers have any non-null dereferences.
+  if (non_null_deref_p (name, bb, search_dom))
+    {
+      // Remove zero from the range.
+      unsigned prec = TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (name));
+      r.intersect (wi::one (prec), wi::max_value (prec, UNSIGNED));
+      return true;
+    }
+  return false;
+}
+
 // This class manages a vector of pointers to ssa_block ranges.  It
 // provides the basis for the "range on entry" cache for all
 // SSA names.
@@ -106,6 +135,8 @@  public:
 
   void propagate_updated_value (tree name, basic_block bb);
 
+  void block_apply_nonnull (gimple *s);
+  void update_to_nonnull (basic_block bb, tree name);
   non_null_ref m_non_null;
   gori_compute m_gori;
 
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc b/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc
index 3bf9bd1e981..483bcd2e582 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@  path_range_query::range_defined_in_block (irange &r, tree name, basic_block bb)
     }
 
   if (bb)
-    m_non_null.adjust_range (r, name, bb);
+    m_non_null.adjust_range (r, name, bb, false);
 
   if (DEBUG_SOLVER && (bb || !r.varying_p ()))
     {
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@  path_range_query::adjust_for_non_null_uses (basic_block bb)
       else
 	r.set_varying (TREE_TYPE (name));
 
-      if (m_non_null.adjust_range (r, name, bb))
+      if (m_non_null.adjust_range (r, name, bb, false))
 	set_cache (r, name);
     }
 }
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range.cc b/gcc/gimple-range.cc
index 73398ddef99..04075a98a80 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-range.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-range.cc
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@  along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 #include "tree-scalar-evolution.h"
 #include "gimple-range.h"
 #include "gimple-fold.h"
+#include "gimple-walk.h"
 
 gimple_ranger::gimple_ranger () :
 	non_executable_edge_flag (cfun),
@@ -117,8 +118,10 @@  gimple_ranger::range_of_expr (irange &r, tree expr, gimple *stmt)
       // If name is defined in this block, try to get an range from S.
       if (def_stmt && gimple_bb (def_stmt) == bb)
 	{
-	  range_of_stmt (r, def_stmt, expr);
-	  m_cache.m_non_null.adjust_range (r, expr, bb, true);
+	  // Check for a definition override from a block walk.
+	  if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (expr))
+	      || !m_cache.block_range (r, bb, expr, false))
+	    range_of_stmt (r, def_stmt, expr);
 	}
       // Otherwise OP comes from outside this block, use range on entry.
       else
@@ -151,7 +154,12 @@  gimple_ranger::range_on_entry (irange &r, basic_block bb, tree name)
   if (m_cache.block_range (entry_range, bb, name))
     r.intersect (entry_range);
 
-  m_cache.m_non_null.adjust_range (r, name, bb, true);
+  if (dom_info_available_p (CDI_DOMINATORS))
+    {
+      basic_block dom_bb = get_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb);
+      if (dom_bb)
+	m_cache.m_non_null.adjust_range (r, name, dom_bb, true);
+    }
 
   if (idx)
     tracer.trailer (idx, "range_on_entry", true, name, r);
@@ -227,6 +235,9 @@  gimple_ranger::range_on_edge (irange &r, edge e, tree name)
   else
     {
       range_on_exit (r, e->src, name);
+      // If this is not an abnormal edge, check for a non-null exit .
+      if ((e->flags & (EDGE_EH | EDGE_ABNORMAL)) == 0)
+	m_cache.m_non_null.adjust_range (r, name, e->src, false);
       gcc_checking_assert  (r.undefined_p ()
 			    || range_compatible_p (r.type(), TREE_TYPE (name)));
 
@@ -436,6 +447,16 @@  gimple_ranger::fold_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree (*valueize) (tree))
   return ret;
 }
 
+// Called during dominator walks to register any side effects that take effect
+// from this point forward.  Current release is only for tracking non-null
+// within a block.
+
+void
+gimple_ranger::register_side_effects (gimple *s)
+{
+  m_cache.block_apply_nonnull (s);
+}
+
 // This routine will export whatever global ranges are known to GCC
 // SSA_RANGE_NAME_INFO and SSA_NAME_PTR_INFO fields.
 
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range.h b/gcc/gimple-range.h
index ec568153a8d..0733a534853 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-range.h
+++ b/gcc/gimple-range.h
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@  public:
   void dump_bb (FILE *f, basic_block bb);
   auto_edge_flag non_executable_edge_flag;
   bool fold_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree (*) (tree));
+  void register_side_effects (gimple *s);
 protected:
   bool fold_range_internal (irange &r, gimple *s, tree name);
   void prefill_name (irange &r, tree name);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr104288.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr104288.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..95eb196f9e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr104288.c
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ 
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-evrp -fdelete-null-pointer-checks" } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { keeps_null_pointer_checks } } */
+
+void keep(int result) __attribute__((noipa));
+void keep(int result)
+{
+    if (result)
+        __builtin_exit(0);
+}
+
+void foo (void *p) __attribute__((nonnull(1)));
+
+void bar (void *p)
+{
+  keep (p == 0);
+  foo (p);
+  if (!p)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "abort" "evrp" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times  "== 0B;" 1 "evrp" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vrp.cc b/gcc/tree-vrp.cc
index 62946450b13..e9f19d0c8b9 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vrp.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vrp.cc
@@ -4309,9 +4309,11 @@  public:
 
   bool fold_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi) OVERRIDE
   {
-    if (m_simplifier.simplify (gsi))
-      return true;
-    return m_ranger->fold_stmt (gsi, follow_single_use_edges);
+    bool ret = m_simplifier.simplify (gsi);
+    if (!ret)
+      ret = m_ranger->fold_stmt (gsi, follow_single_use_edges);
+    m_ranger->register_side_effects (gsi_stmt (*gsi));
+    return ret;
   }
 
 private:
-- 
2.17.2