| Message ID | bf577133-ed7c-40ce-8450-b275662f816e@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers |
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-bounces~patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3B53858D1E for <patchwork@sourceware.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:46:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AC3B53858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=Ad8j3B3O X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mail-qt1-x842.google.com (mail-qt1-x842.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::842]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 233543857C67 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:43:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 233543857C67 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 233543857C67 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::842 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1757983416; cv=none; b=DOkI3WAARnBeAUy1Roy0d6HRWPCjMZMYnIdC8b093I7AF85QyQUvK3SqXVsm67QJE6eAy71xhdIDJIK943IOE3OxrJhSCVeBYejstFgk3g1cgdY/XJBPNhZrgf+hSnXxXvIak5W6vH9+9j9iLkZy98fswoyzwM2Ka16hCwWDeGA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1757983416; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kacKmPbslrPuvlQQQuVJBMVk4uMES1K9751GHrFePB8=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From:Subject; b=lMCl3X/Dyruxmy/pBr4NIl2ol7AqAUQ5weRlayf/ThXCDE3mOpm0Hyp2B8MU3BiCrBPp/+YNo5KWbNpaVynIybYduMiR40iGXf/n3+lqgn4yXz03CfphofHM+5zgWDVx3Lh0rgPomfJmiH/j7DOHicSlOr/ycpXBnFnvA85DgxU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 233543857C67 Received: by mail-qt1-x842.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4b79a332631so25161861cf.0 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:43:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1757983415; x=1758588215; darn=gcc.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:cc:to:content-language :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=EYxYIxTapD9m2zn6pcovIJ2dwvHtypcML4R9AsY7qTQ=; b=Ad8j3B3OyyjeWUll6lYNb/j2bmNWoKhLIV8oLivITcxWzcy0JlP7cWOH2gjS0BClxH +9D8CYYUuuZKnVV6nKdYK7HFXH0J+3utZVxJE1v0+l1XMii44q5o3nIbiKQsAugJkaw1 +OwJnJxegnf0rADX4d9TZjFZixFdmp0/eZzlv9hpPVvBiSkCn+M/In5ocJHJ1J7fKhHL QxyWC+7z02xEqQMGYkdKXcExpDTHh2jegitb1sUU0kNB8lBIieXIF/wzCf4UmJMFQB+g RoUZ95uMmXKILMevJd8EnOL9+Me/tBUzMTTrJFyeGDenw1K1HtYm66INK/s3kHnqa3iD EhEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757983415; x=1758588215; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:cc:to:content-language :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EYxYIxTapD9m2zn6pcovIJ2dwvHtypcML4R9AsY7qTQ=; b=VSqdDjZtU0zK3xmV6crvK0SzieLQEupRtJtTfUEjGD419wrd7wKmXmIi3aRvzQdQ0V NeE7Vsvn7mPk+tQyy1dRAYVDr/iMuOq9Z66ObYftTlK/Dp/y4yUuxClPRb6+x9v2O/z4 PKvFk3aq/tTcMFcR8h4PLkOOwhpjA0Cu0UX5oNrJ5uY61cNBnUeVoBvMfjeE9Smfmer0 9cEj0MOD6anBO1huSUpVLioe8eDq83yVI+/sJwTzHJmfmCEpYagzL7FdsrlvMf6uoYOh sLcekkNgVWCTtOQ2Cnm0RJ1Byj1LUyrXpc7F+bT69UbkqcFhdCVoNLcW1YOhIXTXO1PI iLJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxQw7KeB7qPMf6uDey9p+qo/5W4LxgdNJE3i9JRHzhh4mEKZOic xc9B6A0yxHfqmX/SN62DDHo17eDu6O8/BnyLtCnT2/rENDYo6IahunbTxicWMQG8BlY= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctpAMeUorYmQdiqmMXcPoBTQOiN1rCkg9XNgrog7Lige/E7YSHuNngT9lvnpth PaV9eS3Zsy8vpnIFsdlabMtErQJTiZwDVg02PwP7NsYK/qTZB0zTzb4wqKZybdbYPia2RC/ADLe LjaXxSd4+Wz1A/1wSHwaifbDTcWkijg9DZDtxQlDjzKkm2Rn1oH9XxNl2j4Oe3dedBJw6tgv79M bYVK0thxJrMLjKiYxEZBWIwuViOSLmcEIrwP7ZofcQOvN3oZVrDn01AZVkyQenWYXjplSW25W+Q 0jMPQz6roUvu7ud5KD7NNDEqPAiy3YyWf1WzIU3SQZI/+2Dx7w++SC9a/zHlAF41k/DkbAOiOx/ isdI7Or25af5+sUrsBHeqXDgYjlvHrsvLZ11x1KnQ0guqus5IyfuKyPi+Eyl0+0M1F+lYUHjbrX B30mtS X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHAhVeA6OSnGgjz0AL6me9KLnFnu5U1qzkR8X513Zp7m+vCoSDwSpp49fvsCKZrlTXL+K51ng== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:17cd:b0:4b7:89b8:d09c with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4b789b8d193mr152495801cf.74.1757983414723; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.134.55.74] (108-216-84-41.lightspeed.stlsmo.sbcglobal.net. [108.216.84.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-4b639dd12bbsm76367691cf.43.2025.09.15.17.43.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <bf577133-ed7c-40ce-8450-b275662f816e@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:43:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Betterbird (Linux) Content-Language: en-US To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: jason@redhat.com From: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix lambdas with variadic parameters and static specifier [PR119048] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces~patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org |
| Series |
c++: Fix lambdas with variadic parameters and static specifier [PR119048]
|
|
Commit Message
Eczbek
Sept. 16, 2025, 12:43 a.m. UTC
From d70ac2b0a7b524829d22b3bb6bacbe1ef381c7fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:37:20 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix lambdas with variadic parameters and static specifier [PR119048] PR c++/119048 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * lambda.cc (compare_lambda_sig): Only skip first parameter for object members. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C: New test. Signed-off-by: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> --- gcc/cp/lambda.cc | 12 ++++++++---- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C
Comments
On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Eczbek wrote: > From d70ac2b0a7b524829d22b3bb6bacbe1ef381c7fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:37:20 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix lambdas with variadic parameters and static > specifier [PR119048] > > PR c++/119048 > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * lambda.cc (compare_lambda_sig): Only skip first parameter for > object members. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C: New test. > > Signed-off-by: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> > --- > gcc/cp/lambda.cc | 12 ++++++++---- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc > index 711e3b7a18e..8950404ae1d 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc > @@ -1742,10 +1742,14 @@ compare_lambda_sig (tree fn_a, tree fn_b) > || fn_b == error_mark_node) > return false; > > - for (tree args_a = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_a))), > - args_b = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_b))); > - args_a || args_b; > - args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a), args_b = TREE_CHAIN (args_b)) > + tree args_a = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_a)); > + if (DECL_OBJECT_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (fn_a)) > + args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a); Thanks for the patch! This definitely seems like an improvement to the current buggy code, but I think we really only want to skip implicit object parameters since we should consider explicit object parameters part of the lambda signature and thus compare them. Does checking DECL_IOBJ_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P instead work? > + tree args_b = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_b)); > + if (DECL_OBJECT_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (fn_b)) > + args_b = TREE_CHAIN (args_b); > + for (; args_a || args_b; > + args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a), args_b = TREE_CHAIN (args_b)) > { > if (!args_a || !args_b) > return false; > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..46aa6b42ce8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +// PR c++/119048 > +// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } } > + > +int main() { > + [] {}, [](...) static {}; > +} > -- > 2.51.0 > >
On 9/18/25 9:57 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Eczbek wrote: > >> From d70ac2b0a7b524829d22b3bb6bacbe1ef381c7fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:37:20 -0400 >> Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix lambdas with variadic parameters and static >> specifier [PR119048] >> >> PR c++/119048 >> >> gcc/cp/ChangeLog: >> >> * lambda.cc (compare_lambda_sig): Only skip first parameter for >> object members. >> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >> >> * g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C: New test. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> >> --- >> gcc/cp/lambda.cc | 12 ++++++++---- >> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C | 6 ++++++ >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C >> >> diff --git a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc >> index 711e3b7a18e..8950404ae1d 100644 >> --- a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc >> +++ b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc >> @@ -1742,10 +1742,14 @@ compare_lambda_sig (tree fn_a, tree fn_b) >> || fn_b == error_mark_node) >> return false; >> >> - for (tree args_a = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_a))), >> - args_b = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_b))); >> - args_a || args_b; >> - args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a), args_b = TREE_CHAIN (args_b)) >> + tree args_a = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_a)); >> + if (DECL_OBJECT_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (fn_a)) >> + args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a); > > Thanks for the patch! > > This definitely seems like an improvement to the current buggy code, but > I think we really only want to skip implicit object parameters since we > should consider explicit object parameters part of the lambda signature > and thus compare them. Does checking DECL_IOBJ_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P > instead work? Or shorten to FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (fn_[ab]). Jason
On 9/19/25 8:51 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 9/18/25 9:57 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Eczbek wrote: >> >>> From d70ac2b0a7b524829d22b3bb6bacbe1ef381c7fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> >>> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:37:20 -0400 >>> Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix lambdas with variadic parameters and static >>> specifier [PR119048] >>> >>> PR c++/119048 >>> >>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog: >>> >>> * lambda.cc (compare_lambda_sig): Only skip first parameter for >>> object members. >>> >>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >>> >>> * g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C: New test. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> gcc/cp/lambda.cc | 12 ++++++++---- >>> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C | 6 ++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C >>> >>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc >>> index 711e3b7a18e..8950404ae1d 100644 >>> --- a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc >>> +++ b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc >>> @@ -1742,10 +1742,14 @@ compare_lambda_sig (tree fn_a, tree fn_b) >>> || fn_b == error_mark_node) >>> return false; >>> >>> - for (tree args_a = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_a))), >>> - args_b = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_b))); >>> - args_a || args_b; >>> - args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a), args_b = TREE_CHAIN (args_b)) >>> + tree args_a = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_a)); >>> + if (DECL_OBJECT_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (fn_a)) >>> + args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a); >> >> Thanks for the patch! >> >> This definitely seems like an improvement to the current buggy code, but >> I think we really only want to skip implicit object parameters since we >> should consider explicit object parameters part of the lambda signature >> and thus compare them. Does checking DECL_IOBJ_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P >> instead work? > > Or shorten to FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (fn_[ab]). > > Jason Thanks! -- >8 -- From d4613869df103ba461ca268c8a803ad529f479ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:58:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix lambdas with variadic parameters and static specifier [PR119048] PR c++/119048 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * lambda.cc (compare_lambda_sig): Only skip first parameter for object members. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C: New test. Signed-off-by: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> --- gcc/cp/lambda.cc | 4 ++-- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc index 711e3b7a18e..bb0aa7d0a02 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc @@ -1742,8 +1742,8 @@ compare_lambda_sig (tree fn_a, tree fn_b) || fn_b == error_mark_node) return false; - for (tree args_a = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_a))), - args_b = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_b))); + for (tree args_a = FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (fn_a), + args_b = FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (fn_b); args_a || args_b; args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a), args_b = TREE_CHAIN (args_b)) { diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..46aa6b42ce8 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +// PR c++/119048 +// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } } + +int main() { + [] {}, [](...) static {}; +}
On 9/20/25 2:25 PM, Eczbek wrote: >> Or shorten to FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (fn_[ab]). >> >> Jason > > Thanks! > > -- >8 -- > > From d4613869df103ba461ca268c8a803ad529f479ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:58:00 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix lambdas with variadic parameters and static > specifier [PR119048] > > PR c++/119048 > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * lambda.cc (compare_lambda_sig): Only skip first parameter for > object members. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C: New test. > > Signed-off-by: Eczbek <eczbek.void@gmail.com> Applied, thanks! I'm not familiar with this identity, so I can't accept the Signed-off-by, but the change is small enough to be insignificant for copyright so I pushed it on that basis. If you want to contribute larger patches under a pseudonym that isn't known in the GCC community, please file a copyright assignment with the FSF. https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal Thanks again, Jason > --- > gcc/cp/lambda.cc | 4 ++-- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc > index 711e3b7a18e..bb0aa7d0a02 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc > @@ -1742,8 +1742,8 @@ compare_lambda_sig (tree fn_a, tree fn_b) > || fn_b == error_mark_node) > return false; > > - for (tree args_a = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_a))), > - args_b = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_b))); > + for (tree args_a = FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (fn_a), > + args_b = FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (fn_b); > args_a || args_b; > args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a), args_b = TREE_CHAIN (args_b)) > { > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C b/gcc/ > testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..46aa6b42ce8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +// PR c++/119048 > +// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } } > + > +int main() { > + [] {}, [](...) static {}; > +}
diff --git a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc index 711e3b7a18e..8950404ae1d 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/lambda.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/lambda.cc @@ -1742,10 +1742,14 @@ compare_lambda_sig (tree fn_a, tree fn_b) || fn_b == error_mark_node) return false; - for (tree args_a = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_a))), - args_b = TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_b))); - args_a || args_b; - args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a), args_b = TREE_CHAIN (args_b)) + tree args_a = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_a)); + if (DECL_OBJECT_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (fn_a)) + args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a); + tree args_b = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fn_b)); + if (DECL_OBJECT_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (fn_b)) + args_b = TREE_CHAIN (args_b); + for (; args_a || args_b; + args_a = TREE_CHAIN (args_a), args_b = TREE_CHAIN (args_b)) { if (!args_a || !args_b) return false; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..46aa6b42ce8 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call8.C @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +// PR c++/119048 +// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } } + +int main() { + [] {}, [](...) static {}; +}