c++/modules: Fix propagating noexcept for templates [PR124785]
Checks
| Context |
Check |
Description |
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gcc_build--master-arm |
success
|
Build passed
|
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm |
success
|
Test passed
|
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Build passed
|
| linaro-tcwg-bot/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64 |
success
|
Test passed
|
Commit Message
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk/15?
-- >8 --
We triggered a checking assertion because when propagating deduced
noexcept, we were updating the type of the existing TEMPLATE_DECL but
not the type of its DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT, violating assumptions made
later on during modules streaming.
But actually there was nothing to propagate here anyway, these
declarations are identical, so this patch also fixes the condition for
checking whether we need to propagate anything. And so now I don't
think there is ever a case we should have a noexcept-spec to propagate
for a TEMPLATE_DECL, so add an assertion to validate this.
PR c++/124785
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* module.cc (trees_in::is_matching_decl): Narrow condition for
when noexcept propagation occurs; assert that we don't propagate
noexcept-specs for TEMPLATE_DECLs.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5.h: New test.
* g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_a.C: New test.
* g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_b.C: New test.
* g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_c.C: New test.
Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com>
---
gcc/cp/module.cc | 4 +++-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5.h | 4 ++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_a.C | 7 +++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_b.C | 7 +++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_c.C | 11 +++++++++++
5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5.h
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_a.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_b.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_c.C
Comments
On 4/5/26 10:56 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk/15?
OK.
> -- >8 --
>
> We triggered a checking assertion because when propagating deduced
> noexcept, we were updating the type of the existing TEMPLATE_DECL but
> not the type of its DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT, violating assumptions made
> later on during modules streaming.
>
> But actually there was nothing to propagate here anyway, these
> declarations are identical, so this patch also fixes the condition for
> checking whether we need to propagate anything. And so now I don't
> think there is ever a case we should have a noexcept-spec to propagate
> for a TEMPLATE_DECL, so add an assertion to validate this.
>
> PR c++/124785
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * module.cc (trees_in::is_matching_decl): Narrow condition for
> when noexcept propagation occurs; assert that we don't propagate
> noexcept-specs for TEMPLATE_DECLs.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5.h: New test.
> * g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_a.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_b.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_c.C: New test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com>
> ---
> gcc/cp/module.cc | 4 +++-
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5.h | 4 ++++
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_a.C | 7 +++++++
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_b.C | 7 +++++++
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_c.C | 11 +++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5.h
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_a.C
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_b.C
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_c.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> index a8517569a1b..8b820f97fee 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> @@ -12619,12 +12619,14 @@ trees_in::is_matching_decl (tree existing, tree decl, bool is_typedef)
> tree d_spec = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (d_type);
> if (DECL_MAYBE_DELETED (e_inner) || DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (e_spec))
> {
> - if (!DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (d_spec)
> + if (!(DECL_MAYBE_DELETED (d_inner)
> + || DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (d_spec))
> || (UNEVALUATED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (e_spec)
> && !UNEVALUATED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (d_spec)))
> {
> dump (dumper::MERGE)
> && dump ("Propagating instantiated noexcept to %N", existing);
> + gcc_checking_assert (existing == e_inner);
> TREE_TYPE (existing) = d_type;
>
> /* Propagate to existing clones. */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5.h b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..78d91322a1a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +// PR c++/124785
> +template <typename T> struct Iterator {
> + constexpr friend auto operator<=>(const Iterator&, const Iterator&) = default;
> +};
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_a.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_a.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..72085717e60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_a.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +// PR c++/124785
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
> +// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules" }
> +// { dg-module-cmi M:A }
> +
> +export module M:A;
> +#include "noexcept-5.h"
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_b.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_b.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..928980b6c1d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_b.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +// PR c++/124785
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
> +// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules" }
> +// { dg-module-cmi M:B }
> +
> +export module M:B;
> +#include "noexcept-5.h"
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_c.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_c.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..d9349147766
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/noexcept-5_c.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +// PR c++/124785
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
> +// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules -fdump-lang-module-alias" }
> +// { dg-module-cmi M }
> +
> +export module M;
> +export import :A;
> +export import :B;
> +
> +// The noexcept-specifiers are equivalent, no need to merge.
> +// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump-not {Propagating instantiated noexcept} module } }
@@ -12619,12 +12619,14 @@ trees_in::is_matching_decl (tree existing, tree decl, bool is_typedef)
tree d_spec = TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (d_type);
if (DECL_MAYBE_DELETED (e_inner) || DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (e_spec))
{
- if (!DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (d_spec)
+ if (!(DECL_MAYBE_DELETED (d_inner)
+ || DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (d_spec))
|| (UNEVALUATED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (e_spec)
&& !UNEVALUATED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (d_spec)))
{
dump (dumper::MERGE)
&& dump ("Propagating instantiated noexcept to %N", existing);
+ gcc_checking_assert (existing == e_inner);
TREE_TYPE (existing) = d_type;
/* Propagate to existing clones. */
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+// PR c++/124785
+template <typename T> struct Iterator {
+ constexpr friend auto operator<=>(const Iterator&, const Iterator&) = default;
+};
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// PR c++/124785
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules" }
+// { dg-module-cmi M:A }
+
+export module M:A;
+#include "noexcept-5.h"
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// PR c++/124785
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules" }
+// { dg-module-cmi M:B }
+
+export module M:B;
+#include "noexcept-5.h"
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/124785
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules -fdump-lang-module-alias" }
+// { dg-module-cmi M }
+
+export module M;
+export import :A;
+export import :B;
+
+// The noexcept-specifiers are equivalent, no need to merge.
+// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump-not {Propagating instantiated noexcept} module } }