From patchwork Wed May 18 11:19:05 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Prathamesh Kulkarni X-Patchwork-Id: 54159 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Delivered-To: patchwork@sourceware.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6D53857377 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 11:26:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2E6D53857377 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1652873166; bh=7Ff0qDPidNZfwp8kgPMLuOhIUkBoedfPIJR4y7u1wIk=; h=Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:From; b=U1EPur6NvkAMbPHBgWyn2kqyao7OjQAuhfuLmJR2lbf1Mmg05Ces12THQ1HdxPIxz aoEEdMannL62podzueU/oj9ax4o2iH6r5bEyW56LShAhrmJN9D0Ow/bztMdCDL6sVS xZfCpm156iMJ4SmmCfbgRV2zwOZfx1iKXU4GGyQY= X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E63F3857805 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 11:19:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6E63F3857805 Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id h11so1394148eda.8 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 04:19:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7Ff0qDPidNZfwp8kgPMLuOhIUkBoedfPIJR4y7u1wIk=; b=TRb+1jpGeo9yED35quCeHxZif01Jzugno/PUnLwPy91iVupa48gsH1eyY/NSVfSPuI w3cpkOcpV+3C5d1nOZxxOKkfJQGZd8Oq7PjzjSN/01jzMS84p9mmm2Rg4RRiuXq5uVmb MKASzLhqXG7N4NGs5KHyyj5mkhz7KK0lQ9WHAqb4/oTy1MpjF3AoAB8L54+BVJ9hCdx2 kxP/2nk/GZUkbAH124GCYbgSGx7l/DEOqCbBadAoh3uiOZ2IdGuZgNVKwAt2jLPgRJKa AUYkxLuwxrT6aEAjR86x3jqfmIGeWyMo737rG3gfcC0Ouxsc8KrYg/3SmLi3kdkydfjU pVuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QkmdPll3JJ0vxXJ0H//bbLrvC9fkPodkPd0CfwIFf3BcoKijq oSjYYrdW6Yon/BjrtE/pPFJFugI5yE195eoC7tEhN4p3kHnP0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHVKNU8c7R48pjcv8ULAGbKEKEeN463knWzwpdbjOVBhhQnCmhRkyg/bqy72m2jR5MUP0oa5gaLI5jpPHtZOA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:176b:b0:42a:a828:5d79 with SMTP id da11-20020a056402176b00b0042aa8285d79mr19513175edb.272.1652872782159; Wed, 18 May 2022 04:19:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 16:49:05 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: [8/9] s390 changes to adjust vec_perm_const hook To: gcc Patches X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches From: Prathamesh Kulkarni Reply-To: Prathamesh Kulkarni Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+patchwork=sourceware.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" Hi, The attached patch adjusts vec_perm_const hook to accommodate the new parameter. For rationale, please see: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/595128.html Unfortunately, I am not sure how to cross test this patch. make all-gcc stage-1 seems to build fine. Is it OK to commit the patch ? Thanks, Prathamesh diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc b/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc index 45bbb6c3d70..e46566c526c 100644 --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.cc @@ -17175,9 +17175,12 @@ vectorize_vec_perm_const_1 (const struct expand_vec_perm_d &d) hook is supposed to emit the required INSNs. */ bool -s390_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1, - const vec_perm_indices &sel) +s390_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, machine_mode op_mode, rtx target, + rtx op0, rtx op1, const vec_perm_indices &sel) { + if (vmode != op_mode) + return false; + struct expand_vec_perm_d d; unsigned int i, nelt;